Veränderungen der Arbeitswelt durch Künstliche Intelligenz
Anwendungsmöglichkeiten und Auswirkungen des Einsatzes künstlicher Intelligenz auf den Arbeitsmarkt werden breit diskutiert. Welche Folgen für Beschäftigung, Löhne und Qualifikationsanforderungen sind zu erwarten? Birgt die Nutzung automatisierter Entscheidungssysteme (z.B. für die Personalauswahl) ein Diskriminierungsrisiko? Wie wirkt sich der Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz auf die Arbeitsqualität aus?
Dieses Themendossier stellt Literatur zum Stand der Forschung zusammen.
Im Filter „Autorenschaft“ können Sie auf IAB-(Mit-)Autorenschaft eingrenzen.
-
Literaturhinweis
Künstliche Intelligenz und Gender - eine Frage diskursiver (Gegen-)Macht? (2024)
Zitatform
Carstensen, Tanja & Kathrin Ganz (2024): Künstliche Intelligenz und Gender - eine Frage diskursiver (Gegen-)Macht? In: WSI-Mitteilungen, Jg. 77, H. 1, S. 26-33. DOI:10.5771/0342-300X-2024-1-26
Abstract
"Mit der Digitalisierung von Arbeit ist häufig die Frage verbunden, ob sich Geschlechterungleichheiten verändern. Aktuell wird dies vor allem mit Blick auf Künstliche Intelligenz (KI ) kontrovers diskutiert. Im betrieblichen Alltag gewinnt KI zunehmend an Relevanz ; in politischen, medialen und wissenschaftlichen Diskursen wird bereits seit einigen Jahren thematisiert, inwiefern KI aus Geschlechterperspektiven relevant ist. Dieser Beitrag untersucht diese Diskurse und widmet sich der Frage, inwiefern sich durch die Anwendung von KI -Technologien geschlechtliche Machtungleichheiten in der Arbeitswelt verändern und ob sich mit KI Ansatzpunkte für die Entwicklung von Gegenmacht erkennen lassen." (Textauszug, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Wie kollegial ist Künstliche Intelligenz?: Risikowahrnehmungen und Gestaltungsanforderungen aus Sicht von Beschäftigten (2024)
Gerlmaier, Anja; Bendel, Alexander;Zitatform
Gerlmaier, Anja & Alexander Bendel (2024): Wie kollegial ist Künstliche Intelligenz? Risikowahrnehmungen und Gestaltungsanforderungen aus Sicht von Beschäftigten. (IAQ-Report 2024-01), Duisburg ; Essen, 15 S. DOI:10.17185/duepublico/81427
Abstract
Zukünftig werden immer mehr Beschäftigte nicht nur in ihrem privaten Umfeld, sondern auch am Arbeitsplatz mit Systemen zusammenarbeiten, die auf Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) basieren. Das IAQ untersuchte im Rahmen des "HUMAINE"-Projektes, wie Beschäftigte die Kooperation mit solchen KI-Systemen bewerten und welche Gestaltungsanforderungen sie an diese neue Form der hybriden Mensch-KI-Zusammenarbeit haben. Es zeigte sich, dass KI-Systeme je nach Interaktionsform unterschiedliche Potenziale und Risiken aufweisen. Um die KI-basierten Risiken zu verringern, sollten Nutzer*innen frühzeitig an der Konzeption und Implementierung beteiligt und dabei arbeitswissenschaftliche Gestaltungskriterien berücksichtigt werden. (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Folgen des technologischen Wandels für den Arbeitsmarkt: Vor allem Hochqualifizierte bekommen die Digitalisierung verstärkt zu spüren (2024)
Grienberger, Katharina; Matthes, Britta; Paulus, Wiebke;Zitatform
Grienberger, Katharina, Britta Matthes & Wiebke Paulus (2024): Folgen des technologischen Wandels für den Arbeitsmarkt: Vor allem Hochqualifizierte bekommen die Digitalisierung verstärkt zu spüren. (IAB-Kurzbericht 05/2024), Nürnberg, 8 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.KB.2405
Abstract
"Die Potenziale, dass berufliche Tätigkeiten durch Computer oder computergesteuerte Maschinen vollautomatisch erledigt werden könnten, ändern sich, wenn neue Technologien auf dem Markt verfügbar werden. Bei der Neuberechnung solcher Substituierbarkeitspotenziale wird neben dieser Entwicklung auch berücksichtigt, dass sich die Tätigkeitsprofile in den Berufen verändern, neue Berufe und Tätigkeiten entstehen und Beschäftigte ihren Beruf wechseln. Die Autorinnen zeigen für die technologischen Möglichkeiten im Jahr 2022, wie hoch das Substituierbarkeitspotenzial derzeit ist und wie es sich seit 2013 verändert hat." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
Weiterführende Informationen
-
Literaturhinweis
No Thanks, Dear AI! Understanding the Effects of Disclosure and Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Public Sector Recruitment (2024)
Keppeler, Florian;Zitatform
Keppeler, Florian (2024): No Thanks, Dear AI! Understanding the Effects of Disclosure and Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Public Sector Recruitment. In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Jg. 34, H. 1, S. 39-52. DOI:10.1093/jopart/muad009
Abstract
"Applications based on artificial intelligence (AI) play an increasing role in the public sector and invoke political discussions. Research gaps exist regarding the disclosure effects—reactions to disclosure of the use of AI applications—and the deploymenteffect—efficiency gains in data savvy tasks. This study analyzes disclosure effects and explores the deployment of an AI application in a preregistered field experiment (n = 2,000) co-designed with a public organization in the context of employer-driven recruitment. The linear regression results show that disclosing the use of the AI application leads to significantly less interest in an offer among job candidates. The explorative analysis of the deployment of the AI application indicates that the person–job fit determined by the leaders can be predicted by the AIapplication. Based on the literature on algorithm aversion and digital discretion, this study provides a theoretical and empirical disentanglement of the disclosure effect and the deployment effect to inform future evaluations of AI applications in the public sector. It contributes to the understanding of how AI applications can shape public policy and management decisions, and discusses the potential benefits and downsides of disclosing and deploying AI applications in the public sector and in employer-driven recruitment." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
KI im Unternehmen – Herausforderungen an die betriebliche Gestaltung moderner Arbeit (2024)
Zitatform
Pfeiffer, Sabine (2024): KI im Unternehmen – Herausforderungen an die betriebliche Gestaltung moderner Arbeit. In: Faktor Arbeitsschutz H. 11, S. 34-39.
Abstract
"Eine Befragung von Beschäftigten zu ihrer Einstellung gegenüber der Nutzung von KI bei der Arbeit ergab – entgegen immer wieder behaupteter Angstzuschreibung – ein abgewogenes „Es kommt darauf an“. Wichtig ist es, Beschäftigte von Anfang an bei der Installation von KI im Betrieb zu beteiligen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity and Employment – How Can We Assess It and What Can We Observe? (2024)
Saam, Marianne;Zitatform
Saam, Marianne (2024): The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Productivity and Employment – How Can We Assess It and What Can We Observe? In: Intereconomics, Jg. 59, H. 1, S. 22-27. DOI:10.2478/ie-2024-0006
Abstract
"Technological optimists have been predicting the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution since the beginning of the past decade. This expectation contrasts with low productivity growth in many countries. The commercial release of ChatGPT in late 2022 has lead to rising expectations about a dramatic shift at least equivalent to the one associated with the commercial introduction of the Internet. But what is AI from an economic point of view? How can we observe the diffusion of AI in the economy and assess its effects in order to the draw conclusions for economic policy?" (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The rise of artificial intelligence, the fall of human wellbeing? (2024)
Zitatform
Zhao, Yong, Da Yin, Lili Wang & Yihua Yu (2024): The rise of artificial intelligence, the fall of human wellbeing? In: International Journal of Social Welfare, Jg. 33, H. 1, S. 75-105. DOI:10.1111/ijsw.12586
Abstract
"Concerns exist regarding the impact on our lives of the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). Using a large dataset of 137 countries over the period 2005–2018 from multiple sources, we estimate the causal effect of AI on individual-level subjective wellbeing. Our identification strategy is inferred from the gravity framework and uses merely the variation in exogenous drivers of a country's AI development. We find a significant negative effect of AI on an individual's wellbeing, in terms of current levels or expectations of future wellbeing. The results are robust to alternative measures of AI, identification strategies, and sampling. Moreover, we find evidence of significant heterogeneity in the impact of AI on individual wellbeing. Further, this dampening effect on individual wellbeing resulting from the use of AI is more prominent among young people, men, high-income groups, high-skilled groups, and manufacturing workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Rebalancing AI (2023)
Acemoglu, Daron; Johnson, Simon;Zitatform
Acemoglu, Daron & Simon Johnson (2023): Rebalancing AI. In: Finance and development, S. 26-29.
Abstract
"Optimistic forecasts regarding the growth implications of AI abound. AI adoption could boost productivity growth by 1.5 percentage points per year over a 10-year period and raise global GDP by 7 percent ($7 trillion in additional output), according to Goldman Sachs. Industry insiders offer even more excited estimates, including a supposed 10 percent chance of an “explosive growth” scenario, with global output rising more than 30 percent a year. All this techno-optimism draws on the “productivity bandwagon”: a deep-rooted belief that technological change— including automation—drives higher productivity, which raises net wages and generates shared prosperity. Such optimism is at odds with the historical record and seems particularly inappropriate for the current path of “just let AI happen,” which focuses primarily on automation (replacing people). We must recognize that there is no singular, inevitable path of development for new technology. And, assuming that the goal is to sustainably improve economic outcomes for more people, what policies would put AI development on the right path, with greater focus on enhancing what all workers can do?" (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Metaverse revolution and the digital transformation: intersectional analysis of Industry 5.0 (2023)
Agarwal, Ayushi; Alathur, Sreejith;Zitatform
Agarwal, Ayushi & Sreejith Alathur (2023): Metaverse revolution and the digital transformation: intersectional analysis of Industry 5.0. In: Transforming Government : People, Process and Policy, Jg. 17, H. 4, S. 688-707. DOI:10.1108/TG-03-2023-0036
Abstract
"Purpose: This study aims to investigate metaverse elements affecting digital transformation and examine how the metaverses ’ enabled digital transformation affects Industry 5.0. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts intersectional research methodologies to understand how metaverse technologies facilitate digital transformation and contribute to Industry 5.0. The Metaverse literature is bibliometrically analyzed to identify the intersection of digital transformation and components of Industry 5.0. Findings The conceptualization of the metaverse, its ecosystem and its enabling technologies are consistent with the human-centric, resilient and sustainable vision of the industrial revolution. The findings show that scientific research into digital transformation contributes to refining potential conflicts and tensions that may arise at the intersection of the metaverse and Industry 5.0. Research limitations/implications Study have significant implications for digital transformation research, as transformation studies help to fine-tune emerging technologies such as the metaverse for the industrial revolution. Based on the findings, the authors have provided a threat model for the Sustainable Metaverse Revolution. Social implications The utility of metaverse technologies in industrial revolutions necessitates the formulation of business model policies that promote the metaverse-enabled digital transformation. Policy recommendations for integrated development approaches are also provided in this paper. Originality/value The metaverse-enabled digital transformation and its implications for the industrial revolution are less reported. The current study addresses the importance of such intersectional studies." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
New Technologies and Jobs in Europe (2023)
Albanesi, Stefania; Jimeno, Juan F.; Lamo, Ana; Wabitsch, Alena; Dias da Silva, Antonio;Zitatform
Albanesi, Stefania, Antonio Dias da Silva, Juan F. Jimeno, Ana Lamo & Alena Wabitsch (2023): New Technologies and Jobs in Europe. (IZA discussion paper / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 16227), Bonn, 58 S.
Abstract
"We examine the link between labour market developments and new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and software in 16 European countries over the period 2011- 2019. Using data for occupations at the 3-digit level in Europe, we find that on average employment shares have increased in occupations more exposed to AI. This is particularly the case for occupations with a relatively higher proportion of younger and skilled workers. This evidence is in line with the Skill Biased Technological Change theory. While there exists heterogeneity across countries, only very few countries show a decline in employment shares of occupations more exposed to AI-enabled automation. Country heterogeneity for this result seems to be linked to the pace of technology diffusion and education, but also to the level of product market regulation (competition) and employment protection laws. In contrast to the findings for employment, we find little evidence for a relationship between wages and potential exposures to new technologies." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech (2023)
Avery, Mallory; Vecci, Joseph; Leibbrandt, Andreas;Zitatform
Avery, Mallory, Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci (2023): Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech. (Discussion paper / Monash University, Department of Economics 2023-09), Clayton, 69 S.
Abstract
"The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recruitment is rapidly increasing and drastically changing how people apply to jobs and how applications are reviewed. In this paper, we use two field experiments to study how AI in recruitment impacts gender diversity in the male-dominated technology sector, both overall and separately for labor supply and demand. We find that the use of AI in recruitment changes the gender distribution of potential hires, in some cases more than doubling the fraction of top applicants that are women. This change is generated by better outcomes for women in both supply and demand. On the supply side, we observe that the use of AI reduces the gender gap in application completion rates. Complementary survey evidence suggests that this is driven by female jobseekers believing that there is less bias in recruitment when assessed by AI instead of human evaluators. On the demand side, we find that providing evaluators with applicants' AI scores closes the gender gap in assessments that otherwise disadvantage female applicants. Finally, we show that the AI tool would have to be substantially biased against women to result in a lower level of gender diversity than found without AI." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Industrie 5.0 (2023)
Becker, Marco; Daube, Carl Heinz; Reinking, Ernst;Zitatform
Becker, Marco, Carl Heinz Daube & Ernst Reinking (2023): Industrie 5.0. (EconStor Preprints 270296), Kiel, 12 S.
Abstract
"Spätestens seit der Etablierung von ChatGPT als eine für die breite Masse sowohl der Unternehmen als auch der Bevölkerung gleichermaßen interessante Anwendung der Künstlichen Intelligenz im November 2022 neigt sich die Epoche der Industrie 4.0 dem Ende entgegen. In diesem Working Paper werden die Grenzen der Industrie 4.0 aufgezeigt und die Potenziale der Industrie 5.0 analysiert." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Risks to job quality from digital technologies: Are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge? (2023)
Zitatform
Berg, Janine, Francis Green, Laura Nurski & David A. Spencer (2023): Risks to job quality from digital technologies: Are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge? In: European journal of industrial relations, Jg. 29, H. 4, S. 347-365. DOI:10.1177/09596801231178904
Abstract
"We examine job quality effects of new digital technologies, using the European frame of seven job quality domains: Pay, Working Time Quality, Prospects, Skills and Discretion, Work Intensity, Social Environment, and Physical Environment. Theoretical effects are ambivalent across all domains. The analysis of these effects confirms that digital technologies can both improve and harm job quality depending on how they are used. In light of this analysis and to think through the challenge of regulating digital technologies, we review emerging regulations across several European countries. Drawing on the principles of human-centred design, we argue that worker participation is important for securing good job quality outcomes, at both the innovation and adoption stages. We also consider the application of data protection legislation to the regulation of job quality. Overall, the paper extends debate about the future of work beyond employment and pay, on to a consideration of job quality more broadly." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Jetzt bloß nicht den Anschluss verlieren! – Status quo, Potenziale und Herausforderungen von Künstlicher Intelligenz (2023)
Zitatform
Bertschek, Irene (2023): Jetzt bloß nicht den Anschluss verlieren! – Status quo, Potenziale und Herausforderungen von Künstlicher Intelligenz. In: Wirtschaftsdienst, Jg. 103, H. 8, S. 518-520. DOI:10.2478/wd-2023-0149
Abstract
"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is likely to be the next general purpose technology. The U.S. and China are important players in the development of AI. Germany has a vibrant AI startup scene and is among the first third of EU countries in applying AI technologies. In order not to lose touch with international developments, Germany should work toward creating research- and innovation-friendly framework conditions. Appropriate measures include improving data availability, building AI expertise and enabling flexible regulation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from US Commuting Zones (2023)
Bonfiglioli, Alessandra; Gancia, Gino; Papadakis, Ioannis; Crinò, Rosario;Zitatform
Bonfiglioli, Alessandra, Rosario Crinò, Gino Gancia & Ioannis Papadakis (2023): Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from US Commuting Zones. (CESifo working paper 10685), München, 41 S.
Abstract
"We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across commuting zones and time. We find that AI's impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECD AI surveys of employers and workers (2023)
Broecke, Stijn; Williams, Morgan; Lane, Marguerita;Zitatform
Broecke, Stijn, Marguerita Lane & Morgan Williams (2023): The impact of AI on the workplace: Main findings from the OECD AI surveys of employers and workers. (OECD social, employment and migration working papers 288), Paris, 156 S. DOI:10.1787/ea0a0fe1-en
Abstract
"New OECD surveys of employers and workers in the manufacturing and finance sectors of seven countries shed new light on the impact that Artificial Intelligence has on the workplace —an under-researched area to date due to lack of data. The findings suggest that both workers and their employers are generally very positive about the impact of AI on performance and working conditions. However, there are also concerns, including about job loss—an issue that should be closely monitored. The surveys also indicate that, while many workers trust their employers when it comes to the implementation of AI in the workplace, more can be done to improve trust. In particular, the surveys show that both training and worker consultation are associated with better outcomes for workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The macroeconomics of artificial intelligence (2023)
Brynjolfsson, Erik; Unger, Gabriel;Zitatform
Brynjolfsson, Erik & Gabriel Unger (2023): The macroeconomics of artificial intelligence. In: Finance and development, S. 20-25.
Abstract
"Economists have a poor track record of predicting the future. And Silicon Valley repeatedly cycles through hope and disappointment over the next big technology. So a healthy skepticism toward any pronouncements about how artificial intelligence will change the economy is justified. Nonetheless, there are good reasons to take seriously the growing potential of AI—systems that exhibit intelligent behavior, such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving —to transform the economy, especially given the astonishing technica ladvances of the past year. AI may affect society in a number of areas besides the economy—including national security, politics, and culture. But in this article, we focus on the implications of AI on three broad areas of macroeconomic interest: productivity growth, the labor market, and industrial concentration. AI does not have a predetermined future. It can develop in very different directions. The particular future that emerges will be a consequence of many things, including technological and policy decisions made today. For each area, we present a fork in the road: two paths that lead to very different futures for AI and the economy. In each case, the bad future is the path of least resistance. Getting to the better future will require good policy—including • Creative policy experiments • A set of positive goals for what society wants from AI, not just negative outcomes to be avoided • Understanding that the technological possibilities of AI are deeply uncertain and rapidly evolving and that society must be flexible in evolving with them." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Generative AI at Work (2023)
Brynjolfsson, Erik; Raymond, Lindsey R.; Li, Danielle;Zitatform
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Danielle Li & Lindsey R. Raymond (2023): Generative AI at Work. (NBER working paper / National Bureau of Economic Research 31161), Cambridge, Mass, 56 S.
Abstract
"We study the staggered introduction of a generative AI-based conversational assistant using data from 5,179 customer support agents. Access to the tool increases productivity, as measured by issues resolved per hour, by 14 percent on average, with the greatest impact on novice and low-skilled workers, and minimal impact on experienced and highly skilled workers. We provide suggestive evidence that the AI model disseminates the potentially tacit knowledge of more able workers and helps newer workers move down the experience curve. In addition, we show that AI assistance improves customer sentiment, reduces requests for managerial intervention, and improves employee retention." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Künstliche Intelligenz – wo stehen wir in Deutschland? (2023)
Zitatform
Brühl, Volker (2023): Künstliche Intelligenz – wo stehen wir in Deutschland? In: Wirtschaftsdienst, Jg. 103, H. 8, S. 521-524. DOI:10.2478/wd-2023-0150
Abstract
"Artificial Intelligence (AI) is widely regarded as a technology which will impact the future competitiveness of the German economy. Looking at the research productivity of German scientists and universities in AI, we find that Germany definitively belongs to the top performers in AI research globally, although the United States and China are somewhat ahead. This is not surprising taking into account the sheer size of their talent pools. Furthermore, the majority of promising AI startups are based in the United States, while Germany is clearly underrepresented in the group of excellent AI startups given Germany’s excellence in AI research. Hence, it is obviously more challenging for Germany to translate research excellence into successful entrepreneurship." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Ökonomische Effekte von ChatGPT (2023)
Buxmann, Peter; Zöll, Anne;Zitatform
Buxmann, Peter & Anne Zöll (2023): Ökonomische Effekte von ChatGPT. In: Controlling & Management Review, Jg. 67, H. 5, S. 16-21. DOI:10.1007/s12176-023-1066-4
Abstract
Der Beitrag beleuchtet aus ökonomischer Perspektive die Auswirkungen des auf verschiedenen Algorithmen des maschinellen Lernens beruhenden Chatbots ChatGPT sowie die Potenziale einer Zusammenarbeit zwischen Menschen und Künstlicher Intelligenz. Die bei einer ökonomischen Bewertung der Nutzung digitaler Technologien unterschiedenen substitutiven Effekte (Kosten- sowie Zeiteinsparungen) und komplementären Effekte (Verbesserung der Qualität) lassen sich auch bei der Anwendung von ChatGPT und anderen Sprachmodellen feststellen. Referiert werden hierzu u.a. die Ergebnisse einer Studie des 'Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), die die verschiedenen Anwendungsgebiete aufzeigt und die ökonomischen Vorteile quantifiziert. Entgegen der in der Öffentlichkeit geäußerten Befürchtung einer massiven Vernichtung von Arbeitsplätzen oder Horror-Szenarien durch unkontrollierbare Verselbständigungen der KI heben die Autoren eine andere Perspektive hervor: Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Menschen und KI (Stichwort 'hybride Intelligenz') kann die Entscheidungsfindung (etwa Strategie- und Kaufentscheidungen) beschleunigen und durch den gegenseitigen Austausch und das gegenseitige Lernen voneinander verbessern. Noch ist nicht das ganze Potenzial dieser 'Basistechnologie des 21. Jahrhunderts' zu ermessen, beispielhaft können aber schon heute die Anwendungsbereiche medizinische Diagnostik, Texterstellung und Softwareentwicklung genannt werden. (IAB)