Veränderungen der Arbeitswelt durch Künstliche Intelligenz
Anwendungsmöglichkeiten und Auswirkungen des Einsatzes künstlicher Intelligenz auf den Arbeitsmarkt werden breit diskutiert. Welche Folgen für Beschäftigung, Löhne und Qualifikationsanforderungen sind zu erwarten? Birgt die Nutzung automatisierter Entscheidungssysteme (z.B. für die Personalauswahl) ein Diskriminierungsrisiko? Wie wirkt sich der Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz auf die Arbeitsqualität aus?
Dieses Themendossier stellt Literatur zum Stand der Forschung zusammen.
Im Filter „Autorenschaft“ können Sie auf IAB-(Mit-)Autorenschaft eingrenzen.
-
Literaturhinweis
Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence (2025)
Zitatform
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Bharat Chandar & Ruyu Chen (2025): Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence. (Working Papers / Stanford Digital Economy Lab), Stanford, 57 S.
Abstract
"This paper examines changes in the labor market for occupations exposed to generative artificial intelligence using high-frequency administrative data from the largest payroll software provider in the United States. We present six facts that characterize these shifts. We find that since the widespread adoption of generative AI, early-career workers (ages 22-25) in the most AI-exposed occupations have experienced a 13 percent relative decline in employment even after controlling for firm-level shocks. In contrast, employment for workers in less exposed fields and more experienced workers in the same occupations has remained stable or continued to grow. We also find that adjustments occur primarily through employment rather than compensation. Furthermore, employment declines are concentrated in occupations where AI is more likely to automate, rather than augment, human labor. Our results are robust to alternative explanations, such as excluding technology-related firms and excluding occupations amenable to remote work. These six facts provide early, large-scale evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the AI revolution is beginning to have a significant and disproportionate impact on entry-level workers in the American labor market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
KI-Jobs in Deutschland: Stagnation statt Boom: Eine Analyse von Online-Stellenanzeigen (2025)
Büchel, Jan; Engler, Jan Felix; Mertens, Armin;Zitatform
Büchel, Jan, Jan Felix Engler & Armin Mertens (2025): KI-Jobs in Deutschland: Stagnation statt Boom. Eine Analyse von Online-Stellenanzeigen. 22 S. DOI:10.11586/2025025
Abstract
"Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) ist eine zentrale Zukunftstechnologie, die mehr Effizienz und Produktivität in Unternehmen ermöglichen kann. Vor dem Hintergrund der angespannten wirtschaftlichen Lage Deutschlands und dem vorliegenden demografiebedingten Fachkräftemangel sollten Unternehmen das Potenzial von KI nutzen, um ihre Wettbewerbsfähigkeit zu stärken. Positiv ist, dass im Jahr 2024 etwa jedes fünfte Unternehmen in Deutschland angibt, KI bereits zu nutzen. Der KI-Einsatz benötigt dabei neue Kompetenzen, beispielsweise wenn Unternehmen KI-Lösungen selbst entwickeln möchten. Auch wenn zugekaufte KI-Lösungen im Unternehmen angewendet werden, entstehen Kompetenzbedarfe. Um die Bedarfe der Unternehmen zu erfassen, hat das Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft im Auftrag der Bertelsmann Stiftung Online-Stellenanzeigen mit Bezug zu KI aus den Jahren 2019 bis 2024 analysiert." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
Weiterführende Informationen
Zusammenfassung der Studie -
Literaturhinweis
AI and the global productivity divide: Fuel for the fast or a lift for the laggards? (2025)
Zitatform
Chaar, Tania, Francesco Filippucci, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio & Giuseppe Nicoletti (2025): AI and the global productivity divide. Fuel for the fast or a lift for the laggards? (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers 51), Paris, 42 S. DOI:10.1787/c315ea90-en
Abstract
"Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to be an important driver of productivity growth over the next decade, even if with significant cross-country heterogeneity. This paper examines the potential of AI to foster productivity growth in Low-Income Countries (LICs) and Lower-Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). LICs and LMICs risk benefiting less from AI due to low incidence of knowledge-intensive services, where gains from AI mostly occur. Additionally, barriers to AI adoption include inadequate digital infrastructure, low levels of education and skills in the workforce, limited access to financing for high AI adoption costs, and underdeveloped regulatory frameworks. At the same time, LICs and LMICs may benefit from factors such as a young workforce and international spillovers through knowledge transfers. Overall, structural weaknesses in LICs and LMICs risk outweighing these potential advantages. This underscores the need for policies that enhance capabilities for AI adoption in LICs and LMICs and help seizing long-run opportunities from the global AI economy." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Iceberg Index: Measuring Workforce Exposure Across the AI Economy (2025)
Chopra, Ayush; Bhattacharya, Santanu; Schwarze, Alice C.; Ahmad, Feroz; Balaprakash, Prasanna; Garg, Aditi; Salvador, DeAndrea; Wright, Teddy; Raskar, Ramesh; Paul, Ayan;Zitatform
Chopra, Ayush, Santanu Bhattacharya, DeAndrea Salvador, Ayan Paul, Teddy Wright, Aditi Garg, Feroz Ahmad, Alice C. Schwarze, Ramesh Raskar & Prasanna Balaprakash (2025): The Iceberg Index: Measuring Workforce Exposure Across the AI Economy. (arXiv papers), 21 S. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2510.25137
Abstract
"Artificial Intelligence is reshaping America’s over $9.4 trillion labor market, with cascading effects that extend far beyond visible technology sectors. When AI automates quality control in automotive plants, consequences spread through logistics networks, supply chains, and local service economies. Yet traditional workforce metrics cannot capture these ripple effects: they measure employment outcomes after disruption occurs, not where AI capabilities overlap with human skills before adoption crystallizes. Project Iceberg addresses this gap using Large Population Models to simulate the human–AI labor market, representing 151 million workers as autonomous agents executing over 32,000 skills across 3,000 counties and interacting with thousands of AI tools. It introduces the Iceberg Index, a skills-centered metric that measures the wage value of skills AI systems can perform within each occupation. The Index captures technical exposure, where AI can perform occupational tasks, not displacement outcomes or adoption timelines. Analysis shows that visible AI adoption concentrated in computing and technology (2.2% of wage value, approximately $211 billion) represents only the tip of the iceberg. Technical capability extends far below the surface through cognitive automation spanning administrative, financial, and professional services (11.7%, approximately $1.2 trillion). This exposure is fivefold larger and geographically distributed across all states rather than confined to coastal hubs. Traditional indicators such as GDP, income, and unemployment explain less than 5% of this skills-based variation, underscoring why new indices are needed to capture exposure in the AI economy. By simulating how capabilities may spread under alternative scenarios, Project Iceberg enables policymakers and business leaders to identify exposure hotspots, prioritize training and infrastructure investments, and test interventions before committing billions to implementation. Iceberg is built with the AgentTorch framework." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
How do structural trends affect labour market shortages and mismatch? (2025)
Zitatform
Dorville, Yann, Francesco Filippucci & Luca Marcolin (2025): How do structural trends affect labour market shortages and mismatch? (OECD productivity working papers 38), Paris, 63 S. DOI:10.1787/acfb5c31-en
Abstract
"This paper examines how AI and digital technology diffusion, the green transition, globalisation and population ageing jointly affect labour market tightness across 26 OECD countries and 34 sectors. It finds that digitalisation and decarbonisation increase tightness, while ageing does so only over time. Import competition and labour-substituting AI diffusion, conversely, reduce shortages." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach (2025)
Zitatform
Drago, Carlo, Alberto Costantiello, Marco Savorgnan & Angelo Leogrande (2025): Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach. In: Economies, Jg. 13, H. 8. DOI:10.3390/economies13080226
Abstract
"This article investigates the macroeconomic and labor market conditions that shape the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies among large firms in Europe. Based on panel data econometrics and supervised machine learning techniques, we estimate how public health spending, access to credit, export activity, gross capital formation, inflation, openness to trade, and labor market structure influence the share of firms that adopt at least one AI technology. The research covers all 28 EU members between 2018 and 2023. We employ a set of robustness checks using a combination of fixed-effects, random-effects, and dynamic panel data specifications supported by Clustering and supervised learning techniques. We find that AI adoption is linked to higher GDP per capita, healthcare spending, inflation, and openness to trade but lower levels of credit, exports, and capital formation. Labor markets with higher proportions of salaried work, service occupations, and self-employment are linked to AI diffusion, while unemployment and vulnerable work are detractors. Cluster analysis identifies groups of EU members with similar adoption patterns that are usually underpinned by stronger economic and institutional fundamentals. The results collectively suggest that AI diffusion is shaped not only by technological preparedness and capabilities to invest but by inclusive macroeconomic conditions and equitable labor institutions. Targeted policy measures can accelerate the equitable adoption of AI technologies within the European industrial economy." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Artificial intelligence and labor market outcomes: AI has created new jobs to meet digital and automation needs, and those equipped with AI capital enjoy increased employment and wages (2025)
Zitatform
Drydakis, Nick (2025): Artificial intelligence and labor market outcomes. AI has created new jobs to meet digital and automation needs, and those equipped with AI capital enjoy increased employment and wages. (IZA world of labor 514), Bonn, o. S. DOI:10.15185/izawol.514
Abstract
"AI is reshaping the labor market by creating new jobs and increasing competition for high-skilled roles, benefiting those with AI capital. While AI may boost productivity in certain jobs, it also widens the gap between high- and low-skilled employees. Less-educated employees face higher risks of displacement and reduced income. Additionally, AI introduces challenges related to workforce adaptability, trust, ethics, and transparency, which negatively impact employees' job realities. Policymakers should navigate these changes to maximize the benefits of AI while mitigating its adverse effects." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Cross-country skills-technology policy debates through large language models (2025)
Zitatform
Einhoff, Jan, Isabella López Trejos & Caroline Paunov (2025): Cross-country skills-technology policy debates through large language models. (OECD science, technology and industry working papers 2025,20), Paris, 43 S. DOI:10.1787/d5f669be-en
Abstract
"Language models, this paper conducts a cross-country comparative innovation policy analysis of skills-technology policy debates across seven OECD member countries (Austria, Canada, Finland, Germany, Korea, Sweden, and the United Kingdom). Results highlight the dominance of STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) and digital skills in these policy debates, the relative neglect of green skills, and the emphasis on soft skills across all technology fields. The analysis also identifies common policy instruments, which include collaborative platforms and direct financial support. Overall, the paper shows how large language models can help policy analysts identify patterns and gaps in extensive policy texts that nonetheless critically demands expert oversight and careful interpretation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Artificial intelligence, hiring and employment: job postings evidence from Sweden (2025)
Engberg, Erik; Hellsten, Mark; Sabolová, Radka; Lodefalk, Magnus ; Javed, Farrukh; Schroeder, Sarah ; Tang, Aili;Zitatform
Engberg, Erik, Mark Hellsten, Farrukh Javed, Magnus Lodefalk, Radka Sabolová, Sarah Schroeder & Aili Tang (2025): Artificial intelligence, hiring and employment: job postings evidence from Sweden. In: Applied Economics Letters, S. 1-6. DOI:10.1080/13504851.2025.2497431
Abstract
"This paper investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on hiring and employment, using the universe of job postings published by the Swedish Public Employment Service from 2014 to 2022 and full-population administrative data for Sweden. We exploit a detailed measure of AI exposure according to occupational content and find that establishments exposed to AI are more likely to hire AI workers. Survey data further indicate that AI exposure aligns with greater use of AI services. Importantly, rather than displacing non-AI workers, AI exposure is positively associated with increased hiring for both AI and non-AI roles. In the absence of substantial productivity gains that might account for this increase, we interpret the positive link between AI exposure and non-AI hiring as evidence that establishments are using AI to augment existing roles and expand task capabilities, rather than to replace non-AI workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Predictive AI and productivity growth dynamics: Evidence from French firms (2025)
Zitatform
Fontanelli, Luca, Mattia Guerini, Raffaele Miniaci & Angelo Secchi (2025): Predictive AI and productivity growth dynamics: Evidence from French firms. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jg. 240. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107336
Abstract
"While artificial intelligence (AI) adoption holds the potential to enhance business operations through improved forecasting and automation, its relation with average productivity growth remain highly heterogeneous across firms. This paper shifts the focus and investigates the impact of predictive AI on the volatility of firms’ productivity growth rates. Using firm-level data from the 2019 French ICT survey, we provide robust evidence that AI use is associated with increased volatility. This relationship persists across multiple robustness checks, including analyses balancing AI users and other firms based on key observables. To propose a possible mechanisms underlying this relation, we compare firms that purchase AI from external providers (“AI buyers”) and those that develop AI in-house (“AI developers”). Our results show that heightened volatility is concentrated among AI buyers, whereas firms that develop AI internally experience no such association. Finally, we find that the AI-volatility link among “AI buyers” is mitigated in firms with a higher share of ICT engineers and technicians, suggesting that AI’s successful integration requires complementary human capital." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Exploring Gender Disparities in the Era of AI (2025)
Fornasari, Tommaso; Bannò, Mariasole;Zitatform
Fornasari, Tommaso & Mariasole Bannò (2025): Exploring Gender Disparities in the Era of AI. In: M. Agostini, V. Beretta, M. C. Demartini, A. Ghio & S. Trucco (Hrsg.) (2025): Diversity and Equity in Accounting. Emerging Issues, Challenges and Opportunities, S. 203-214. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-78247-3_14
Abstract
"This chapter investigates the gender disparities in the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) within the accounting profession, focusing on both the potential risks and benefits that AI presents. Automation technologies, including AI, have rapidly advanced, significantly altering the landscape of work across various industries. The integration of AI into the workforce raises concerns about widespread job displacement, particularly affecting both low-skill and high-skill positions. Our research aims to address the underexplored area of how AI impacts gender disparities in the workplace, specifically within the accounting field. Through qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews with diverse stakeholders, we analyze the risks and opportunities AI presents for women compared to men. The study seeks to uncover workforce inequalities and understand the gender-specific implications of AI, highlighting the need for equitable access to training and resources to ensure both men and women can thrive in an AI-driven work environment. The findings reveal that AI implementation can result in both positive and negative outcomes, influencing employment patterns and job satisfaction. While AI can enhance efficiency and productivity, it also poses risks such as job displacement and increased stress due to work insecurity. The gender disparity in STEM education exacerbates these issues, as women are underrepresented in fields that are crucial for AI-related job opportunities. The chapter emphasizes the importance of proactive measures, including targeted educational programs and inclusive policies, to mitigate the adverse impacts of AI and promote gender equality in the evolving job market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
How AI-Augmented Training Improves Worker Productivity (2025)
Fouarge, Didier ; Stops, Michael ; Janssen, Simon; Fregin, Marie-Christine ; Özgül, Pelin; Rounding, Nicholas; Montizaan, Raymond ; Levels, Mark ;Zitatform
Fouarge, Didier, Marie-Christine Fregin, Simon Janssen, Mark Levels, Raymond Montizaan, Pelin Özgül, Nicholas Rounding & Michael Stops (2025): How AI-Augmented Training Improves Worker Productivity. (IZA discussion paper / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 18224), Bonn, 29 S., App.
Abstract
"We analyze the impact of AI-augmented training on worker productivity in a financial services company. The company introduced an AI tool that provides performance feedback on call center agents to guide their training. To estimate causal effects, we exploit the staggered roll out of the AI-tool. The AI-augmented training reduces call handling time by 10 percent. We find larger effects for short-tenured workers because they spend less time putting clients on hold. But the AI-augmented training also improves communication style with relatively stronger effects for long-tenured agents, and we find slightly positive effects on customer satisfaction." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Die Arbeit: Wie wir sie mit KI neu erfinden … und was für uns übrig bleibt (2025)
Zitatform
Gerpott, Fabiola H. & Stephan A. Jansen (2025): Die Arbeit. Wie wir sie mit KI neu erfinden … und was für uns übrig bleibt. Hamburg: brand eins books, 124 S.
Abstract
"Wie wird sich die Arbeitswelt im Zeitalter der künstlichen Intis zwischen dem Menschen und seinen neuen Maschinen – für andere Arbeit, andere Arbeitsteilungen, andere Führung und andere Bildung. Neben Studien aus der Wissenschaft bietet das Buch konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen für ein neues «Human Machine Resource Management», das nicht nur das Personalmanagement, sondern jeden von uns zu einer anregenderen und sinnstiftenderen Arbeit nutzen kann. Und es lädt dazu ein, an der Zukunft der Arbeit aktiv mitzuarbeiten. Zentrale Themen sind unter anderem die ethischen Implikationen, wenn Entscheidungen an Maschinen delegiert werden, die Auswirkungen auf die Diversität und Leistungsfähigkeit der Belegschaft sowie die Neugestaltung von Arbeitsräumen und HR-Prozessen." (Verlagsangaben, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Artificial intelligence and autonomy at work: empirical insights from Germany (2025)
Zitatform
Giering, Oliver & Stefan Kirchner (2025): Artificial intelligence and autonomy at work: empirical insights from Germany. In: Journal for labour market research, Jg. 59. DOI:10.1186/s12651-025-00401-5
Abstract
"Artificial intelligence (AI) is a prominent topic regarding the digitalisation of work and its diffusion is expected to radically change job quality. Overall, there exists a large discrepancy between discursive expectations and quantitative empirical evidence. In this article, we use a novel module from the German Socio-Economic Panel to examine the overall prevalence of AI at work, the determinants that increase the likelihood of AI use, and its association with autonomy. The results show that 38% of German workers use AI, and AI use is associated with the use of specific digital technologies. Workers in high-level, non-routine occupations are more likely to use AI, particularly in comparison to manual workers. Moreover, the association between AI and autonomy is merely superficial and cannot be properly evaluated without considering workplace preconditions." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers (2025)
Zitatform
Giuntella, Osea, Johannes Konig & Luca Stella (2025): Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers. In: Scientific Reports, Jg. 15, H. 1. DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98241-3
Abstract
"This study explores the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and workers’ well-being and healthusing longitudinal survey data from Germany (2000–2020). Using a measure of occupational exposure to AI, we explore an event study design and a difference-in-differences approach to compare AI-exposed and non-exposed workers. Before AI became widely available, there is no evidence of differential pretrends in workers’ well-being and health. We findno evidence of a sizeable negative impact of AI on workers’ well-being and mental health. If anything, there is evidence of an improvement in health status and health satisfaction, which may be explained by the decline in job physical intensity. Overall, our results are consistent with the lack of negative effects of AI on the labor markets." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
A technological construction of society: Comparing GPT-4 and human respondents for occupational evaluation in the UK (2025)
Zitatform
Gmyrek, Pawel, Christoph Lutz & Gemma Newlands (2025): A technological construction of society: Comparing GPT-4 and human respondents for occupational evaluation in the UK. In: BJIR, Jg. 63, H. 1, S. 180-208. DOI:10.1111/bjir.12840
Abstract
"Despite initial research about the biases and perceptions of large language models (LLMs), we lack evidence on how LLMs evaluate occupations, especially in comparison to human evaluators. In this paper, we present a systematic comparison of occupational evaluations by GPT-4 with those from an in-depth, high-quality and recent human respondents survey in the UK. Covering the full ISCO-08 occupational landscape, with 580 occupations and two distinct metrics (prestige and social value), our findings indicate that GPT-4 and human scores are highly correlated across all ISCO-08 major groups. At the same time, GPT-4 substantially under- or overestimates the occupational prestige and social value of many occupations, particularly for emerging digital and stigmatized or illicit occupations. Our analyses show both the potential and risk of using LLM-generated data for sociological and occupational research. We also discuss the policy implications of our findings for the integration of LLM tools into the world of work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Generative AI and jobs: a refined global index of occupational exposure (2025)
Gmyrek, Pawel ; Troszyński, Marek; Berg, Janine ; Kamiński, Karol; Nafradi, Balint ; Konopczyński, Filip; Rosłaniec, Konrad; Ładna, Agnieszka;Zitatform
Gmyrek, Pawel, Janine Berg, Karol Kamiński, Filip Konopczyński, Agnieszka Ładna, Balint Nafradi, Konrad Rosłaniec & Marek Troszyński (2025): Generative AI and jobs. A refined global index of occupational exposure. (ILO working paper / International Labour Organization 140), Geneva, 72 S. DOI:10.54394/hetp0387
Abstract
"This study updates the ILO’s 2023 Global Index of Occupational Exposure to Generative AI (GenAI), incorporating recent advances in the technology and increasing user familiarity with GenAI tools. Using a representative sample from the 29,753 tasks in the Polish occupational classification system and a survey of 1,640 people employed in each 1-digit ISCO-08 groups, we collect 52,558 data points regarding perceive potential of automation for 2,861 tasks. We then compare this input with a survey and several rounds of Delphi-style discussions among a smaller group of international experts. Based on this process, we create a repository of knowledge about task automation that goes beyond national specificities and use it to develop an AI assistant able to predict scores for tasks in the technical documentation of ISCO-08. Our 2025 scores are presented in a revised framework of four progressively increasing exposure gradients, with a new set of global estimates of employment shares exposed to GenAI. Clerical occupations continue to have the highest exposure levels. Additionally, some strongly digitized occupations have increased exposure, highlighting the expanding abilities of GenAI regarding specialized tasks in professional and technical roles. Globally, one in four workers are in an occupation with some GenAI exposure. 3.3% of global employment falls into the highest exposure category, albeit with significant differences between female (4.7%) and male employment (2.4%). These differences increase with countries’ income (9.6% female vs 3.5% male in Gradient 4in HICs), and so does the overall exposure (11% of total employment in LICs vs 34% in HICs). As most occupations consist of tasks that require human input, transformation of jobs is the most likely impact of GenAI. Linking our refined index with national micro data enables precise projections of such transformations, offering a foundation for social dialogue and targeted policy responses to manage the transition." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
AI and the labour market: opening the black box (2025)
Zitatform
Greenan, Nathalie, Dario Guarascio & Jelena Reljic (2025): AI and the labour market: opening the black box. In: Eurasian business review, Jg. 15, H. 4, S. 925-951. DOI:10.1007/s40821-025-00324-8
Abstract
"This work aims at discussing some of the main (open) questions about the labour impact of AI technologies. First, we provide an in-depth literature review focusing on concepts and measurement approaches and distinguishing between up (invention and knowledge creation), mid (technological innovation and development) and downstream (adoption and diffusion) components of the AI value chain. Second, we summarise the six articles included in the Special Issue ‘AI and labor markets: opening the black box’, distinguishing between contributions focusing on AI exposure, occupations and skill demand; the relationship between AI and automation technologies and their impact on income distribution; and, finally, the effect on organisational structures, management practices, and power dynamics within workplaces. Our analysis emphasises that AI’s employment effects are neither predetermined nor uniform, but shaped by implementation contexts, organisational choices, and institutional frameworks. We find that heterogeneity matters at multiple levels—across countries, sectors, firms, and demographic groups—challenging deterministic narratives and highlighting the need for adaptive policy responses that recognise these asymmetries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Diverging paths: AI exposure and employment across European regions (2025)
Zitatform
Guarascio, Dario, Jelena Reljic & Roman Stöllinger (2025): Diverging paths: AI exposure and employment across European regions. In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Jg. 73, S. 11-24. DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.12.010
Abstract
"This study explores exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and employment patterns in Europe. First, we provide a thorough mapping of European regions focusing on the structural factors—such as sectoral specialisation, R&D capacity, productivity and workforce skills—that may shape diffusion as well as economic and employment effects of AI. To capture these differences, we conduct a cluster analysis which group EU regions in four distinct clusters: high-tech service and capital centres, advanced manufacturing core, southern and eastern periphery. We then discuss potential employment implications of AI in these regions, arguing that while regions with strong innovation systems may experience employment gains as AI complements existing capabilities and production systems, others are likely to face structural barriers that could eventually exacerbate regional disparities in the EU, with peripheral areas losing further ground." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
AI and employment in Europe (2025)
Zitatform
Guarascio, Dario & Jelena Reljic (2025): AI and employment in Europe. In: Economics Letters, Jg. 247. DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112183
Abstract
"This paper contributes to the growing research on AI's labor market impact by presenting novel evidence on the heterogeneous employment effects of AI across EU countries from 2012 to 2022. While concerns persist about AI's disruptive potential, our findings show that occupations more exposed to AI technologies experience stronger employment growth, all else being equal. However, these effects are not uniform across the EU. Positive employment outcomes are concentrated in Innovation Leaders (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden) and Strong Innovators (Austria, Cyprus, France, Germany, Ireland and Luxembourg), emphasizing the context-dependent nature of AI's impact. These findings reflect the uneven distribution of innovation capabilities, with a country's innovation system and ‘absorptive capacity’ playing a crucial role in fully harnessing AI's potential for employment (and economic) growth. Ultimately, this research challenges the notion of AI as universally beneficial or harmful, highlighting its asymmetric effects across countries and occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.) ((en))