Zitatform

Giering, Oliver & Stefan Kirchner (2025): Artificial intelligence and autonomy at work: empirical insights from Germany. In: Journal for labour market research, Jg. 59, H. 1. DOI:10.1186/s12651-025-00401-5

Abstract

"Artificial intelligence (AI) is a prominent topic regarding the digitalisation of work and its diffusion is expected to radically change job quality. Overall, there exists a large discrepancy between discursive expectations and quantitative empirical evidence. In this article, we use a novel module from the German Socio-Economic Panel to examine the overall prevalence of AI at work, the determinants that increase the likelihood of AI use, and its association with autonomy. The results show that 38% of German workers use AI, and AI use is associated with the use of specific digital technologies. Workers in high-level, non-routine occupations are more likely to use AI, particularly in comparison to manual workers. Moreover, the association between AI and autonomy is merely superficial and cannot be properly evaluated without considering workplace preconditions." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Giuntella, Osea, Johannes Konig & Luca Stella (2025): Artificial intelligence and the wellbeing of workers. In: Scientific Reports, Jg. 15, H. 1. DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-98241-3

Abstract

"This study explores the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and workers’ well-being and healthusing longitudinal survey data from Germany (2000–2020). Using a measure of occupational exposure to AI, we explore an event study design and a difference-in-differences approach to compare AI-exposed and non-exposed workers. Before AI became widely available, there is no evidence of differential pre­trends in workers’ well-being and health. We findno evidence of a sizeable negative impact of AI on workers’ well-being and mental health. If anything, there is evidence of an improvement in health status and health satisfaction, which may be explained by the decline in job physical intensity. Overall, our results are consistent with the lack of negative effects of AI on the labor markets." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Gmyrek, Pawel, Janine Berg, Karol Kamiński, Filip Konopczyński, Agnieszka Ładna, Balint Nafradi, Konrad Rosłaniec & Marek Troszyński (2025): Generative AI and jobs. A refined global index of occupational exposure. (ILO working paper / International Labour Organization 140), Geneva, 72 S. DOI:10.54394/hetp0387

Abstract

"This study updates the ILO’s 2023 Global Index of Occupational Exposure to Generative AI (GenAI), incorporating recent advances in the technology and increasing user familiarity with GenAI tools. Using a representative sample from the 29,753 tasks in the Polish occupational classification system and a survey of 1,640 people employed in each 1-digit ISCO-08 groups, we collect 52,558 data points regarding perceive potential of automation for 2,861 tasks. We then compare this input with a survey and several rounds of Delphi-style discussions among a smaller group of international experts. Based on this process, we create a repository of knowledge about task automation that goes beyond national specificities and use it to develop an AI assistant able to predict scores for tasks in the technical documentation of ISCO-08. Our 2025 scores are presented in a revised framework of four progressively increasing exposure gradients, with a new set of global estimates of employment shares exposed to GenAI. Clerical occupations continue to have the highest exposure levels. Additionally, some strongly digitized occupations have increased exposure, highlighting the expanding abilities of GenAI regarding specialized tasks in professional and technical roles. Globally, one in four workers are in an occupation with some GenAI exposure. 3.3% of global employment falls into the highest exposure category, albeit with significant differences between female (4.7%) and male employment (2.4%). These differences increase with countries’ income (9.6% female vs 3.5% male in Gradient 4in HICs), and so does the overall exposure (11% of total employment in LICs vs 34% in HICs). As most occupations consist of tasks that require human input, transformation of jobs is the most likely impact of GenAI. Linking our refined index with national micro data enables precise projections of such transformations, offering a foundation for social dialogue and targeted policy responses to manage the transition." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Guarascio, Dario, Jelena Reljic & Roman Stöllinger (2025): Diverging paths: AI exposure and employment across European regions. In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Jg. 73, S. 11-24. DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.12.010

Abstract

"This study explores exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and employment patterns in Europe. First, we provide a thorough mapping of European regions focusing on the structural factors—such as sectoral specialisation, R&D capacity, productivity and workforce skills—that may shape diffusion as well as economic and employment effects of AI. To capture these differences, we conduct a cluster analysis which group EU regions in four distinct clusters: high-tech service and capital centres, advanced manufacturing core, southern and eastern periphery. We then discuss potential employment implications of AI in these regions, arguing that while regions with strong innovation systems may experience employment gains as AI complements existing capabilities and production systems, others are likely to face structural barriers that could eventually exacerbate regional disparities in the EU, with peripheral areas losing further ground." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))

Zitatform

Guarascio, Dario & Jelena Reljic (2025): AI and employment in Europe. In: Economics Letters, Jg. 247. DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112183

Abstract

"This paper contributes to the growing research on AI's labor market impact by presenting novel evidence on the heterogeneous employment effects of AI across EU countries from 2012 to 2022. While concerns persist about AI's disruptive potential, our findings show that occupations more exposed to AI technologies experience stronger employment growth, all else being equal. However, these effects are not uniform across the EU. Positive employment outcomes are concentrated in Innovation Leaders (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands and Sweden) and Strong Innovators (Austria, Cyprus, France, Germany, Ireland and Luxembourg), emphasizing the context-dependent nature of AI's impact. These findings reflect the uneven distribution of innovation capabilities, with a country's innovation system and ‘absorptive capacity’ playing a crucial role in fully harnessing AI's potential for employment (and economic) growth. Ultimately, this research challenges the notion of AI as universally beneficial or harmful, highlighting its asymmetric effects across countries and occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.) ((en))

Zitatform

Hammermann, Andrea & Louisa Kürten (2025): Generative KI: Schritt halten durch gezielte Kompetenzentwicklung. (IW-Kurzberichte / Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft Köln 2025,24), Köln, 3 S.

Abstract

"Der Einsatz von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) transformiert die Arbeitswelt in einem rasanten Tempo. Eine wichtige Säule zur Ausschöpfung der möglichen KI-Potenziale sind das Wissen und die Anwendungskompetenz von Beschäftigten. Weiterbildung und das Lernen am Arbeitsplatz gewinnen vor diesem Hintergrund an Bedeutung." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Hampole, Menaka, Dimitris Papanikolaou, Lawrence D. W. Schmidt & Bryan Seegmiller (2025): Artificial Intelligence and the Labor Market. (NBER working paper / National Bureau of Economic Research 33509), Cambridge, Mass, 58 S.

Abstract

"We leverage recent advances in NLP to construct measures of workers' task exposure to AI and machine learning technologies over the 2010 to 2023 period that vary across firms and time. Using a theoretical framework that allows for a labor-saving technology to affect worker productivity both directly and indirectly, we show that the impact on wage earnings and employment can be summarized by two statistics. First, labor demand decreases in the average exposure of workers' tasks to AI technologies; second, holding the average exposure constant, labor demand increases in the dispersion of task exposures to AI, as workers shift effort to tasks that are not displaced by AI. Exploiting exogenous variation in our measures based on pre-existing hiring practices across firms, we find empirical support for these predictions, together with a lower demand for skills affected by AI. Overall, we find muted effects of AI on employment due to offsetting effects: highly-exposed occupations experience relatively lower demand compared to less exposed occupations, but the resulting increase in firm productivity increases overall employment across all occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Hausman, Naomi, Oren Rigbi & Sarit Weisburd (2025): Generative AI's Impact on Student Achievement and Implications for Worker Productivity. (CESifo working paper 11843), München, 39 S.

Abstract

"Student use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education is reshaping learning and redefining the skills of future workers. Using student-course data from a top Israeli university, we examine the impact of generative AI tools on academic performance. Comparisons across more and less AI-compatible courses before and after ChatGPT's introduction show that AI availability raises grades, especially for lower-performing students, and compresses the grade distribution, eroding the signal value of grades for employers. Evidence suggests gains in AI-specific human capital but possible losses in traditional human capital, highlighting benefits and costs AI may impose on future workforce productivity." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Humlum, Anders & Emilie Vestergaard (2025): Large Language Models, Small Labor Market Effects. (BFI Working Papers / University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics 2025,56), Chicago, 64 S. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.5219933

Abstract

"We examine the labor market effects of AI chatbots using two large-scale adoption surveys (late 2023 and 2024) covering 11 exposed occupations (25,000 workers, 7,000 workplaces), linked to matched employer-employee data in Denmark. AI chatbots are now widespread —most employers encourage their use, many deploy in-house models, andtraining initiatives are common. These firm-led investments boost adoption, narrow demographic gaps in take-up, enhance workplace utility, and create new job tasks. Yet, despite substantial investments, economic impacts remain minimal. Using difference-in-differences and employer policies as quasi-experimental variation, we estimate precise zeros: AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation, with confidence intervals ruling out effects larger than 1%. Modest productivity gains (average time savings of 3%), combined with weak wage pass-through, help explain these limited labor market effects. Our findings challenge narratives of imminent labor market transformation due to Generative AI." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Jaccoud, Florencia (2025): Robots & AI exposure and wage inequality: a within occupation approach. In: Eurasian business review. DOI:10.1007/s40821-025-00306-w

Abstract

"This paper examines the linkages between occupational exposure to recent automation technologies and inequality across 19 European countries. Using data from the European Union Structure of Earnings Survey (EU-SES), a fixed-effects model is employed to assess the association between occupational exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and to industrial robots–two distinct forms of automation–and within-occupation wage inequality. The analysis reveals that occupations with higher exposure to robots tend to have lower wage inequality, particularly among workers in the lower half of the wage distribution. In contrast, occupations more exposed to AI exhibit greater wage dispersion, especially at the top of the wage distribution. We argue that this disparity arises from differences in how each technology complements individual worker abilities: robot-related tasks often complement routine physical activities, while AI-related tasks tend to amplify the productivity of high-skilled, cognitively intensive work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Janssen, Simon, Christina Langer, Markus Nagler, Nicholas Rounding, Michael Stops & Simon Wiederhold (2025): Wie lässt sich die Nachfrage nach KI- und anderen Kompetenzen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt besser messen? (ROA external reports / Researchcentrum voor Onderwijs en Arbeidsmarkt (Maastricht) 10 ai:conomics policybrief), Maastricht, 6 S.

Abstract

"Eine umfangreiche Forschungsliteratur zeigt, dass der technologische Wandel erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Arbeitsmärkte hat, da moderne digitale Technologien die Nachfrage nach bestimmten Kompetenzen verändern. Zum einen können neue Technologien einige menschliche Tätigkeiten ersetzen. Zum anderen Seite können sie neue Tätigkeiten schaffen oder ergänzen (Acemoglu et al., 2015; Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018, 2019, 2020). Mit der starken Verbreitung Künstlicher Intelligenz in den letzten Jahren gewinnen bestimmte Fragen in der öffentlichen Diskussion und der Forschung zunehmend an Bedeutung: Wächst die Arbeitsnachfrage nach KI-Kompetenzen auch auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt? Führt die steigende Nachfrage nach KI-Kompetenzen dazu, dass andere Kompetenzen – bei niedrig-, mittel- und hochqualifizierten Arbeitskräften – weniger gefragt sind? Ziel dieses Forschungsprojekts ist es, eine belastbare Datengrundlage zu schaffen, um solche Fragen in Zukunft fundierter beantworten zu können. Die Entwicklungen bei generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz, insbesondere von Tools wie ChatGPT, hat die Diskussion über die Auswirkungen von KI auf den Arbeitsmarkt sowohl in der Wissenschaft als auch in der öffentlichen Debatte und in der Politik deutlich verstärkt. Während Computer und Software die Arbeitswelt durch die präzisere und effizientere Ausführung routinemäßiger Aufgaben verändert haben, können moderne KI-Systeme nun komplexe, nichtroutinemäßige Aufgaben übernehmen, ohne auf detaillierte Anweisungen oder wiederholende Regeln angewiesen zu sein (Brynjolfsson et al., 2025). Infolgedessen sehen viele das produktive Potenzial dieser neuen Technologie optimistisch. Andere hingegen befürchten, dass KI die Arbeitsmärkte disruptiv verändern könnte." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Janssen, Simon, Christina Langer, Markus Nagler, Nicholas Rounding, Michael Stops & Simon Wiederhold (2025): How can we better measure the demand for AI and other skills on the labour market? (ROA external reports / Researchcentrum voor Onderwijs en Arbeidsmarkt (Maastricht) 10 ai:conomics policybrief), Maastricht, 5 S.

Abstract

"A large body of research literature shows that technological change has a significant impact on labour markets, as modern digital technologies are changing the demand for certain skills. On the one hand, new technologies can replace some human activities. On the other hand, they can create or complement new activities (Acemoglu et al., 2015; Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018, 2019, 2020). With the proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years, certain questions are becoming increasingly important in public debate and research: Is the demand for AI skills also growing on the German labour market? Does the increasing demand for AI skills mean that other skills - among low, medium and highly qualified workers - are less in demand? The aim of this research project is to create a reliable data basis in order to be able to answer such questions in a more informed way in the future. Developments in generative AI, particularly tools such as ChatGPT, have significantly intensified the discussion about the impact of AI on the labour market, both in academia and in public debate and policy. While computers and software have transformed the world of work by performing routine tasks more precisely and efficiently, modern AI systems can now take on complex, non-routine tasks without relying on detailed instructions or repetitive rules (Brynjolfsson et al., 2025). As a result, many are optimistic about the productive potential of this new technology. Others, however, fear that AI could disrupt labour markets. In the course of the intensive scientific and public debate on AI, there is a growing body of literature that deals with the effects of AI on labour markets. These initially focus on specific occupations such as call centre workers (Brynjolfsson et al., 2025, Dijksman et al., 2024), consultants (Dell’ et al., 2023), writers or developers (Peng et al., 2023). However, a major challenge is to measure how the demand for and supply of skills has changed in the wake of the emergence of AI." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Janssen, Simon, Michael Stops, Sanne Steens, Pelin Özgül, Nicholas Rounding, Sander Dijksman, Raymond Montizaan, Mark Levels, Didier Fourage, Danique Eijkenboom, Evie Graus & Marie-Christine Fregin (2025): Artificial intelligence in the workplace: insights into the transformation of customer services. In: IAB-Forum H. 22.04.2025, 2025-04-22. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FOO.20250422.01

Abstract

"How does the use of artificial intelligence in training affect employee productivity? These and other questions were investigated as part of the long-term research project “ai:conomics” using company data from various large European companies. Initial results suggest that AI can have a positive impact on employee productivity, especially for new employees." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Klonek, Florian & Sharon Parker (2025): Does AI at Work Increase Stress? Text Mining Social Media About Human–AI Team Processes and AI Control. In: Journal of organizational behavior, S. 1-15. DOI:10.1002/job.70000

Abstract

"With rising use of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizations, alongside increasing mental health issues, we seek to understand how AI use affects human stress. Drawing on the automation–augmentation perspective, we propose that AI control over decision-making thwarts human autonomy and thus contributes to stress. Drawing on models of teamwork and augmentation, we expect that human–AI team processes (i.e., transition, action, and interpersonal processes) help people meet their goals and reduce stress. Finally, we argue that human–AI team processes provide an important social resource, which buffers the stress-enhancing role of AI control. To test our hypotheses, we analyzed over 2700 tweets. Using a trained large language model, validated against human ratings, we indexed key measures. Results confirm that high AI control was associated with increased stress, whereas human–AI team processes were associated with decreased stress. In support of the moderation hypothesis, two human–AI team processes (action and interpersonal) helped further reduce the stress-enhancing effect of AI control. We discuss implications for work design theory and the importance of regulating levels of AI control to protect workers' mental health." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Koch, Christian & Michael Stops (2025): KI Navigator #10: Wie KI dem Arbeitsmarkt hilft. In: Heise online, 2025-03-14.

Abstract

"Stellenanzeigen können viel über den Wandel des Arbeitsmarkts verraten. Künstliche Intelligenz hilft dabei, diese Daten zu interpretieren."

Zitatform

Kowalik, Zuzanna, Piotr Lewandowski, Tomasz Geodecki & Maciej Grodzicki (2025): Automation in shared service centres: Implications for skills and autonomy. In: The Economic and Labour Relations Review, S. 1-19. DOI:10.1017/elr.2025.10026

Abstract

"The offshoring-fueled growth of the Central and Eastern European business services sector gave rise to shared service centers (SSCs) – quasi-autonomous entities providing routine-intensive tasks for the central organization. The advent of technologies such as intelligent process automation, robotic process automation, and artificial intelligence jeopardises SSCs’ employment model, necessitating workers’ skills adaptation. The study challenges the deskilling hypothesis and reveals that automation in the Polish SSCs is conducive to upskilling and worker autonomy. Drawing on 31 in-depth interviews, we highlight the negotiated nature of automation processes shaped by interactions between headquarters, SSCs, and their workers. Workers actively participated in automation processes, eliminating the most mundane tasks. This resulted in upskilling, higher job satisfaction, and empowerment. Yet, this phenomenon heavily depends upon the fact that automation is triggered by labor shortages, which limit the expansion of SSCs. This situation encourages companies to leverage the specific expertise entrenched in their existing workforce. The study underscores the importance of fostering employee-driven automation and upskilling initiatives for overall job satisfaction and quality." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Kuhn, Sarah & Holger Seibert (2025): Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt: Durch künstliche Intelligenz sind inzwischen auch viele Expertentätigkeiten ersetzbar. (IAB-Regional. Berichte und Analysen aus dem Regionalen Forschungsnetz. IAB Berlin-Brandenburg 01/2025), 34 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.REBB.2501

Abstract

"Durch neue digitale Technologien verändert sich der deutsche Arbeitsmarkt. Dies gilt besonders für das Ausmaß, in dem Berufe aktuell potenziell durch den Einsatz von Computern oder computergesteuerten Maschinen ersetzbar sind, dem so genannten Substituierbarkeitspotenzial. Es beschreibt, welcher Anteil an Tätigkeiten in einem Beruf schon heute durch den Einsatz moderner Technologien ersetzt werden könnte. Nach wie vor ist zwar das Substituierbarkeitspotenzial bei den Helfer*innen- und Fachkraftberufen am höchsten. Am stärksten gestiegen ist das Potenzial jedoch bei den Expert*innenberufen (u. a. durch generative Künstliche Intelligenz). Besonders bei den IT- und naturwissenschaftlichen Dienstleistungsberufen sind hohe Zuwachsraten zwischen 2019 und 2022 zu verzeichnen. Der vorliegende Beitrag fokussiert sich auf den Arbeitsmarkt in Brandenburg und Berlin. Wichtig zu betonen ist, dass es hier um Potenziale technischer Ersetzbarkeit geht. Ob und inwiefern die technischen Möglichkeiten auch tatsächlich umgesetzt werden, steht nicht fest. Es kann Gründe geben, die gegen eine tatsächliche Substituierung sprechen, beispielsweise weil eine Umstellung zu komplex wäre oder ethische Bedenken dem entgegenstehen. Unstrittig ist jedoch, dass auf der einen Seite einige Tätigkeiten durch die Digitalisierung wegfallen bzw. automatisiert werden, andererseits aber auch neue Tätigkeiten und Berufe entstehen. Daher kann ein hohes Substituierungspotenzial als Indikator für einen Wandel der Arbeitswelt gesehen werden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Kunze, Florian, Carolina Opitz & Ann Sophie Lauterbach (2025): Konstanzer KI-Studie 2025: Die Nutzung von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Arbeitswelt steigt, Ungleichheiten in der Wahrnehmung bleiben weiterhin bestehen. Ergebnisbericht Juli 2025. Konstanz: KOPS Universität Konstanz, 8 S.

Abstract

"Die Nutzung von KI in der Arbeitswelt hat innerhalb eines Jahres deutlich zugenommen – gleichzeitig bleiben erhebliche Unterschiede zwischen Berufsgruppen, Bildungsniveaus und Unternehmen bestehen. In der zweiten Welle der Konstanzer KI-Studie berichten 35?% der Befragten von KI-Nutzung im Arbeitsalltag, ein Anstieg um 11 Prozentpunkte gegenüber dem Vorjahr. Trotz dieses Wachstums bleibt die Unsicherheit hoch: Ein Drittel der Beschäftigten kann weiterhin nicht einschätzen, welche Folgen KI für die eigene Arbeit haben wird. Zugleich wird der gesellschaftliche Einfluss von Automatisierung deutlich bedrohlicher wahrgenommen als die persönliche Betroffenheit. Besonders stark ist der Nutzungszuwachs in wissensintensiven Berufen, während produktionsnahe Tätigkeiten kaum aufholen. Auch die Kluft zwischen Bildungsgruppen bleibt bestehen: Beschäftigte mit hohem Bildungsabschluss nutzen KI mehr als dreimal so häufig wie jene mit niedrigem Abschluss. Zwar steigt die Bereitschaft zur Weiterbildung in allen Gruppen, strukturelle Hürden scheinen jedoch eine Angleichung zu verhindern. Auf Ebene der Organisationen verlaufen die Entwicklungen deutlich langsamer als auf individueller Ebene. Vor allem große Unternehmen investieren zunehmend in Weiterbildung und Führungskommunikation, während kleinere Organisationen kaum Veränderungen zeigen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen deutlich, dass KI ihr Potenzial nicht gleichmäßig entfaltet, sondern bestehende strukturelle Ungleichheiten eher verstärkt. Nach wie vor besteht die reale Gefahr, dass sich bestimmte Beschäftigtengruppen zunehmend vom technologischen Fortschritt abkoppeln, weil ihnen der Zugang zu KI-Nutzung, Weiterbildungsangeboten und betrieblicher Unterstützung fehlt. Daraus ergibt sich ein klarer Handlungsauftrag an Wirtschaft, Politik und Bildungseinrichtungen, um Teilhabechancen gezielt zu fördern und einer wachsenden sozialen Spaltung frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken." (Textauszug, IAB-Doku)

Abstract

"This report examines the potential for generative AI – tools that generate text, images, video or audio, such as ChatGPT, Copilot and Midjourney – to help SMEs address labour and skill needs. It presents evidence from a representative 2024 OECD survey of over 5 000 SMEs in Austria, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Korea and the United Kingdom, on how SMEs use generative AI, how its use may be helping to address labour and skill needs, and how SMEs are preparing employees to use generative AI. The survey shows that generative AI is in use in 31% of SMEs. SMEs report that generative AI improves performance, helps compensate for skill gaps and labour shortages, and increases the need for highly-skilled workers. SMEs have concerns about copyright, legal and regulatory issues, though negative attitudes towards generative AI are rare. The findings highlight the promise of generative AI but also the need for structured policy support to close digital and skills gaps between SMEs and larger firms and to ensure that any gains from generative AI are broadly shared across the economy and the workforce." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Lühr, Thomas & Tobias Kämpf (2025): Bots im Büro. Künstliche Intelligenz und der Wandel von Angestelltenarbeit in der digitalen Transformation. (Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Study 494), Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, 98 S.

Abstract

"Mit der digitalen Transformation kommt es zu einem Schub in der Automatisierung von Arbeit. Die Einführung von Künstlicher Intelligenz führt zur grundlegenden Restrukturierung der Arbeitsinhalte und -prozesse im Büro. Damit gehen nicht nur Risiken von Funktionsverlusten bis hin zum Verlust des Arbeitsplatzes einher, sondern auch neue Machtpotenziale. Diese prägen das Bewusstsein der Angestellten wesentlich. Künstliche Intelligenz funktioniert nicht ohne Mitbestimmung - mit Mitbestimmung ergeben sich neue Ansatzpunkte für eine arbeitspolitische Vorwärtsstrategie. Die vorliegende Studie nimmt eine empirisch gestützte Analyse der Potenziale vor, die der Automatisierungsschub für die Beschäftigten und ihre Interessenvertretungen tatsächlich bietet." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)