Bedingungsloses und solidarisches Grundeinkommen – Konzepte in der Diskussion
Trotz günstiger Beschäftigungslage laufen Langzeitarbeitslose immer noch Gefahr, den Anschluss an den ersten Arbeitsmarkt zu verlieren. Zudem gibt es die Sorge, dass sich diese Entwicklung durch den technologischen Wandel noch verstärken wird. Wäre ein bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen die richtige Antwort? Kann ein solidarisches Grundeinkommen das Bürgergeld nach SGB II weiterentwickeln oder sogar ablösen? Dieses Themendossier stellt wissenschaftliche Literatur zum Thema zusammen und wirft einen Blick auf die aktuelle Diskussion.
Im Filter „Autorenschaft“ können Sie auf IAB-(Mit-)Autorenschaft eingrenzen.
-
Literaturhinweis
Who wants what, and why? Attitude polarization and political viability of UBI (2025)
Zitatform
Becker, Bastian & Hanna Schwander (2025): Who wants what, and why? Attitude polarization and political viability of UBI. In: Journal of European Social Policy, S. 1-23. DOI:10.1177/09589287251400044
Abstract
"This study examines attitude polarization as a key determinant of the political viability of policy reforms, using Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a case in point. While public support for UBI is often high in aggregate, little is known about the extent and nature of underlying divisions. Drawing on a stratified online survey (n = 3076) conducted ahead of a local UBI campaign in Germany, we study who supports what type of basic income, and why . Methodologically, we extend conventional conjoint analysis to directly capture polarization over policy design, and complement it with open-ended responses to elicit respondents’ reasoning. Our findings show that polarization centers on the defining features of UBI – its generosity, unconditionality, and financing – yet also reveal areas of common ground for broader political coalitions. By combining a novel methodological approach with a focus on polarization, our study offers new insights into how public attitudes shape the political feasibility of policy reforms." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Basic Income and Labor Supply: Evidence from an RCT in Germany (2025)
Bernhard, Sarah ; Fiedler, Susann; Bohmann, Sandra; Kasy, Maximilian ; Schwerter, Frederik; Schupp, Jürgen ;Zitatform
Bernhard, Sarah, Sandra Bohmann, Susann Fiedler, Maximilian Kasy, Jürgen Schupp & Frederik Schwerter (2025): Basic Income and Labor Supply. Evidence from an RCT in Germany. (DIW-Diskussionspapiere 2123), Berlin, 45 S.
Abstract
"How does basic income (a regular, unconditional, guaranteed cash transfer) impact labor supply? We show that in search models of the labor market with income effects, this impact is theoretically ambiguous: Employment and job durations might increase or decrease, match surplus might be shifted to workers or employers, and worker surplus might be reallocated between wages and job amenities. We thus turn to empirical evidence to study this impact. We conducted a pre-registered RCT in Germany, starting 2021, where recipients received 1200 Euro/month for three years. We draw on both administrative and survey data, and find no extensive margin (employment) response, and no impact on on job transitions from either non-employment or employment. We do find a small statistically insignificant intensive margin shift to parttime employment, which implies an excess burden (reduction of government revenues) of ca 7.5% of the transfer. We furthermore observe a small increase of enrollment in training or education." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Basic Income and Labor Supply: Evidence from an RCT in Germany (2025)
Bernhard, Sarah ; Schupp, Jürgen ; Bohmann, Sandra; Kasy, Maximilian ; Schwerter, Frederik; Fiedler, Susann;Zitatform
Bernhard, Sarah, Sandra Bohmann, Susann Fiedler, Maximilian Kasy, Jürgen Schupp & Frederik Schwerter (2025): Basic Income and Labor Supply. Evidence from an RCT in Germany. (CESifo working paper 11940), München, 45 S.
Abstract
"How does basic income (a regular, unconditional, guaranteed cash transfer) impact labor supply? We show that in search models of the labor market with income effects, this impact is theoretically ambiguous: Employment and job durations might increase or decrease, match surplus might be shifted to workers or employers, and worker surplus might be reallocated between wages and job amenities. We thus turn to empirical evidence to study this impact. We conducted a pre-registered RCT in Germany, starting 2021, where recipients received 1200 Euro/month for three years. We draw on both administrative and survey data, and find no extensive margin (employment) response, and no impact on on job transitions from either non-employment or employment. We do find a small statistically insignificant intensive margin shift to parttime employment, which implies an excess burden (reduction of government revenues) of ca 7.5% of the transfer. We furthermore observe a small increase of enrollment in training or education." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Ähnliche Treffer
auch erschienen als: DIW-Diskussionspapiere, 2123 -
Literaturhinweis
Basic Income and Labor Supply: Evidence from an RCT in Germany (2025)
Bernhard, Sarah ; Fiedler, Susann; Schwerter, Frederik; Schupp, Jürgen ; Bohmann, Sandra; Kasy, Maximilian ;Zitatform
Bernhard, Sarah, Sandra Bohmann, Susann Fiedler, Maximilian Kasy, Jürgen Schupp & Frederik Schwerter (2025): Basic Income and Labor Supply. Evidence from an RCT in Germany. (SocArXiv papers 109 2123), Berlin, 45 S.
Abstract
"How does basic income (a regular, unconditional, guaranteed cash transfer) impact labor supply? We show that in search models of the labor market with income effects, this impact is theoretically ambiguous: Employment and job durations might increase or decrease, match surplus might be shifted to workers or employers, and worker surplus might be reallocated between wages and job amenities. We thus turn to empirical evidence to study this impact. We conducted a pre-registered RCT in Germany, starting 2021, where recipients received 1200 Euro/month for three years. We draw on both administrative and survey data, and find no extensive margin (employment) response, and no impact on job transitions from either non-employment or employment. We do find a small statistically insignificant intensive margin shift to part-time employment, which implies an excess burden (reduction of government revenues) of ca 7.5% of the transfer. We furthermore observe a small increase of enrollment in training or education." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Ähnliche Treffer
auch erschienen als: DIW-Diskussionspapiere, 2123 -
Literaturhinweis
Fewer obligations for welfare recipients, more social and economic activities? Results from an experiment with less conditional welfare regimes (2025)
Zitatform
Betkó, János, Niels Spierings, Maurice Gesthuizen & Peer Scheepers (2025): Fewer obligations for welfare recipients, more social and economic activities? Results from an experiment with less conditional welfare regimes. In: Journal of Social Policy, Jg. 54, H. 2, S. 374-391. DOI:10.1017/S0047279423000545
Abstract
"This article presents results of a Dutch randomized experiment, challenging the ‘workfare’ paradigm, which is dominant in many countries. We study whether social assistance (SA) schemes with fewer conditions and more autonomy for recipients stimulate valuable but often overlooked unpaid socio-economic activities (USEA), which are not classified as work. In the qualitative part of the mixed method study, we generated new hypotheses stating that particularly recipients who are older, higher educated, have a migration background, have relatively poor health, or have young children, will spend more time on USEA in less conditional and more autonomous regimes. The quantitative part of the study, where two experimental conditions are compared with the usual treatment of SA recipients, does not show convincing average treatment effects, but does reveal that a less conditional and more autonomy-oriented SA scheme translates into more USEA for older people, people with a migration background and people with relatively poor mental health." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Pilotprojekt Grundeinkommen: kein Rückzug vom Arbeitsmarkt, aber bessere mentale Gesundheit (2025)
Zitatform
Bohmann, Sandra, Susann Fiedler, Max Kasy, Jürgen Schupp & Frederik Schwerter (2025): Pilotprojekt Grundeinkommen: kein Rückzug vom Arbeitsmarkt, aber bessere mentale Gesundheit. In: DIW-Wochenbericht, Jg. 92, H. 15, S. 221-229. DOI:10.18723/diw_wb:2025-15-1
Abstract
"Im Juni 2021 startete in Deutschland ein groß angelegtes Feldexperiment zum bedingungslosen Grundeinkommen. Zwei in diesem Wochenbericht zusammengefasste Studien untersuchen, wie sich bedingungslose Geldtransfers in Höhe von monatlich 1200 Euro über einen Zeitraum von drei Jahren auf das Ausgaben- und Arbeitsmarktverhalten sowie auf verschiedene Indikatoren der mentalen Gesundheit und des subjektiven Wohlbefindens auswirkten. Die 107 Teilnehmenden sparten rund ein Drittel der Geldzahlungen und damit mehr als doppelt so viel wie die aus 1580 Personen bestehende Vergleichsgruppe. Knapp acht Prozent der Geldzahlungen gaben sie für wohltätige Zwecke oder zur Unterstützung von Familien- und Freundes-Netzwerken aus. Die Teilnehmenden zogen sich weder aus dem Arbeitsmarkt zurück noch reduzierten sie signifikant ihre geleisteten Arbeitsstunden. Die Zahlungen führten jedoch zu einer signifikanten Verbesserung der mentalen Gesundheit und einem Anstieg der allgemeinen Lebenszufriedenheit sowie weiterer Indikatoren des Wohlbefindens. Die Ergebnisse liefern einen evidenzbasierten Baustein zur Versachlichung der sozialpolitisch relevanten Debatte von bedingungslosen Geldzahlungen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Cash Transfers, Mental Health and Agency: Evidence from an RCT in Germany (2025)
Zitatform
Bohmann, Sandra, Susann Fiedler, Maximilian Kasy, Jürgen Schupp & Frederik Schwerter (2025): Cash Transfers, Mental Health and Agency: Evidence from an RCT in Germany. (CESifo working paper 11989), München, 37 S.
Abstract
"Mental health and wellbeing are unequally distributed in high-income countries, disadvantaging low-income individuals. Unconditional, regular, and guaranteed cash transfers may help address this inequality by promoting financial security and agency. We conducted a preregistered RCT in Germany, where treated participants received monthly payments of EUR 1,200 for three years. Cash transfers improve mental health and wellbeing. These effects are substantively large and robust. Cash transfers also improve perceived autonomy, savings, prosocial giving, time with friends, and sleep. Our findings suggest that cash transfers improve mental health and wellbeing if they empower agency and meaningful life changes." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Basic income in crisis? (Hard) lessons from the pandemic (2025)
Zitatform
De Wispelaere, Jurgen, Joe Chrisp & Leticia Morales (2025): Basic income in crisis? (Hard) lessons from the pandemic. In: Global Policy, Jg. 16, H. 1, S. 167-174. DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.13461
Abstract
"This short paper reflects on the key lessons we can learn from the political debate around and policy experimentation with (emergency) basic income schemes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic crisis initially seems to have opened up a policy window for introducing a basic income as a crisis instrument, theoretical arguments and empirical observations strongly suggest the reliance of some basic income advocates on crisis events, such as the pandemic, to push forward their policy ideas involves wishful thinking rather than political reality. A feasible roadmap towards introducing basic income requires the hard work of raising public awareness, constructing broad constituencies, and building robust political coalitions rather than waiting for the next crisis to come around the corner." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Ein Bürgergeld für alle?: Geschichte und Zukunft eines liberalen Vorschlags (2025)
Gerhardt, Klaus-Uwe;Zitatform
Gerhardt, Klaus-Uwe (2025): Ein Bürgergeld für alle? Geschichte und Zukunft eines liberalen Vorschlags. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 372 S.
Abstract
"Vor mehr als zwei Jahrhunderten wurden in England Lohnzuschüsse für Geringverdienende und Arbeitslose eingeführt. Das als Speenhamland bekannte System wurde gelobt, kritisiert und persifliert. Nach dem Stand der Forschung trugen nicht nur niedrige Energie- und Transportkosten, sondern auch relativ hohe Löhne und Lohnsubventionen zum Vorsprung der britischen Wirtschaft bei, da sie die Massenkaufkraft steigerten. Diese Studie analysiert das Speenhamland-System, seine Funktionsweise und Auswirkungen, und untersucht, warum es trotz positiver Effekte nach 40 Jahren abgeschafft wurde. Die Analyse bietet ein differenziertes Verständnis des Potenzials von Grundeinkommenspolitiken zur Bewältigung sozialer Ungleichheit und der Klimakrise." (Verlagsangaben, IAB-Doku)
Weiterführende Informationen
Inhaltsverzeichnis -
Literaturhinweis
Partial basic income has positive and no heterogenous effects on mental health – An analysis of the Finnish basic income randomized experiment among people in unemployment (2025)
Zitatform
Hiilamo, Aapo & Moritz Oberndorfer (2025): Partial basic income has positive and no heterogenous effects on mental health – An analysis of the Finnish basic income randomized experiment among people in unemployment. (MPIDR working paper / Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research 2025-035), Rostock, 30 S. DOI:10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2025-035
Abstract
"A randomized trial of a partial basic income scheme for the population in unemployment in Finland was conducted in 2017–2018. No studies to date that we are aware of have investigated to what extent the effects of the trial on self-reported mental health were heterogeneous. This is an important question for understanding the implications of basic income schemes for the distribution of mental health in a population. We studied effect heterogeneity using data from a survey conducted at the end of the two-year experiment with a response rate of 20% (intervention n=569, control n=1028). Mental health was measured by the MHI-5 five-item instrument. We considered effect heterogeneity across potential indicators of labor market disadvantages, including age, gender, education, prior employment status, household size, and family type. Participants in the intervention group had moderately better mental health compared with those in the control group (adjusted risk difference for poor mental health -0.08 [95%CI: -0.12; -0.03]). Multilevel modelling and causal forest showed no evidence for heterogenous effects on mental health. Our results suggest that basic incomes schemes have no harmful effects on mental health across multiple potential axes of labor market disadvantage, and are unlikely to increase mental health inequalities among people in unemployment." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Health effects of cash transfers: Evidence from the Finnish basic income experiment (2025)
Zitatform
Hämäläinen, Kari, Miska Simanainen & Jouko Verho (2025): Health effects of cash transfers: Evidence from the Finnish basic income experiment. In: Journal of Public Economics, Jg. 250. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105480
Abstract
"This study provides causal evidence that cash transfer programs have the potential to alleviate the income–health trap in advanced countries. We analyze the Finnish basic income experiment, which replaced the minimum unemployment benefits with a guaranteed income for 2,000 randomly selected unemployed persons during the years 2017–2018. The guaranteed income removed all job–search requirements, but participants could still choose to claim unemployment benefits and comply with related obligations. The experiment also increased average income by 9 %–11 %, for two reasons: basic income payments overlapped with benefits due from the pre-experiment period, and basic income was not tapered against labor earnings. Using register data on all prescription medications and secondary care visits, we find that the experiment reduced psychotropic drug use by 8 %–11 %. Our results also suggest a decline in outpatient mental health visits for secondary care. No effects were detected for other health outcomes. Since most participants opted out of the unconditionality aspect of the experiment and continued to claim unemployment benefits, we attribute the observed health effects primarily to the increased income." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Welfare versus Work Paradox (2025)
Zitatform
Iacono, Roberto (2025): The Welfare versus Work Paradox. In: PLoS ONE, Jg. 20. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321564
Abstract
"How can countries balance work incentives and access to welfare without violating the principle that work shall always be strictly preferred to welfare? In a context in which wages stagnate or drop, and benefit levels are reduced due to austerity measures, the welfare versus work paradox arises. This research shows analytically that when both wages and benefits approach the subsistence level, welfare becomes preferable to work, violating the work incentive principle. The policy implication of this result is that, to maintain the validity of the work incentive principle, minimum wages must be kept above the subsistence threshold." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
How basic income influences daily occupations: A scoping review (2025)
Zitatform
Johansson, Marie, Anita Björklund Carlstedt & Inger Jansson (2025): How basic income influences daily occupations: A scoping review. In: Journal of occupational science, Jg. 32, H. 4, S. 718-738. DOI:10.1080/14427591.2025.2501946
Abstract
"The International Labor Organization forecasts an increase in unemployment and precarious work. These conditions entail occupational injustices through restricting engagement in daily occupations that are crucial for health and well-being. Basic income has been suggested as a possible solution for the forecast scenario. This scoping review explored how basic income influences daily occupations. Literature was searched through databases PRIMO, Social Science Database, Scopus ABI/INFORM, CINAHL, and AMED. Nine books, articles, and reports were identified, and included in a qualitative content analysis. Inductive content analysis revealed four main categories: Daily survival ensured, Another standard of living, Taking care and taking part, and Outlook for the future. The findings revealed the impact of unconditional basic income on both structural and contextual factors influencing daily occupations in terms of securing daily survival, improved performance of daily occupations, increased care and social engagement, and raised hope through opportunities to choose and plan for the future. Basic income may thus have the potential to promote occupational justice. This review contributes to occupational science with knowledge about how unconditional basic income can enhance opportunities to both choose meaningful occupations and reject deleterious and precarious occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
What role do young people believe Universal Basic Income can play in supporting their mental health? (2025)
Johnson, Elliott A.; Webster, Hannah; Pickett, Kate E. ; Morrison, James; Johnson, Matthew T.; Nettle, Daniel ; Mathers, Alice; Thorold, Riley;Zitatform
Johnson, Elliott A., Hannah Webster, James Morrison, Riley Thorold, Alice Mathers, Daniel Nettle, Kate E. Pickett & Matthew T. Johnson (2025): What role do young people believe Universal Basic Income can play in supporting their mental health? In: Journal of Youth Studies, Jg. 28, H. 1, S. 175-194. DOI:10.1080/13676261.2023.2256236
Abstract
"The proportion of 16- to 24-year-olds in England reporting a longstanding mental health condition increased almost 10-fold between 1995 and 2014. Studies demonstrate an association between income and anxiety and depression, with bi-directional effects. There is also emerging evidence that cash transfers may mitigate, prevent or delay those conditions. This article presents qualitative data exploring the relationship between income and anxiety and depression and the prospective impact of Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a public health measure. Data was gathered from citizen engagement workshops with 28 young people aged 14–22 from Bradford, England. We present four findings: (i) participants believe that the current work and welfare system has a detrimental impact on their mental health; (ii) most participants believe that UBI would have positive impacts on their mental health by virtue of reducing financial strain; (iii) most participants appear to favor a UBI scheme with larger payments than have traditionally been proposed; (iv) participants believe that there are non-financial benefits of UBI, such as reduction in stigma." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Universal Basic Income as a Response to Automation? Attitudes of Human Translators Facing Neural Machine Translation (2025)
Zitatform
Kılıç, Azer (2025): Universal Basic Income as a Response to Automation? Attitudes of Human Translators Facing Neural Machine Translation. In: Critical Sociology, Jg. 51, H. 6, S. 1225-1240. DOI:10.1177/08969205241279262
Abstract
"How do professionals who may be at risk of job loss due to AI-driven automation view a universal basic income (UBI) as a policy response to technological unemployment? This article examines the attitudes of translators from Turkey, a country with the highest perceived technological risks across the OECD. Based on interviews, the article reveals varying views on UBI, the framings of which reflect participants’ political views and understandings of capitalist societies. While some participants depict a perspective of economic individualism, emphasizing individual responsibility and a work ethic in opposing UBI, others advocate an anti-capitalist outlook, promoting collective action yet appearing skeptical of UBI. However, a majority supports UBI as a social right. Furthermore, those concerned about job or wage loss are primarily found among those who favor UBI and those who specialize as freelancers in areas perceived as more susceptible to automation, suggesting that job insecurity shapes views of UBI." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Basic Income and Human Needs Satisfaction: Evidence from the HudsonUP Experiment (2025)
Zitatform
Langridge, Nicholas, Leah Hamilton & Alex Dobill (2025): Basic Income and Human Needs Satisfaction: Evidence from the HudsonUP Experiment. In: Social indicators research, Jg. 180, H. 2, S. 1019-1039. DOI:10.1007/s11205-025-03708-5
Abstract
"This article analyses qualitative data from the HudsonUP unconditional basic income (UBI) experiment to examine changes to participants’ human needs satisfaction. Human needs theories offer a holistic perspective on wellbeing and are widely employed in the sustainable welfare and post-growth literatures. However, they are under utilised in empirical UBI research. Through an inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis of interviews conducted at the baseline and three-year mark, the article examines changes in participants’ abilityto satisfy their needs of subsistence, protection, freedom, participation, affection, leisure, understanding, creativity, and identity over the course of the experiment. In doing so, it demonstrates the viability of applying needs-based approaches to UBI research. Findings indicate that the participants’ ability to satisfy their material and non-material needs did increase over the course of the experiment. However, they continued to face barriers to full needs satisfaction. The findings suggest that cash alone is insufficient and proposals for an eco-social UBI –one which contributes to satisfying human needs within ecological limits – must also be accompanied by appropriate of supply-side reforms. The article contributes to bridging the gap between theory and practice when it comes to the potential role of UBI in promoting socially just and sustainable welfare in line with post-growth perspectives." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Challenging the Justice of a Basic Income Policy When Focusing on the Homeless Population: A Case Study on Germany (2025)
Löffler, Verena;Zitatform
Löffler, Verena (2025): Challenging the Justice of a Basic Income Policy When Focusing on the Homeless Population: A Case Study on Germany. In: Basic Income Studies, Jg. 20, H. 2, S. 167-217. DOI:10.1515/bis-2024-0004
Abstract
"In a given society, those who are least advantaged would allegedly benefit the most from receiving a basic income. However, the merits of such a policy are generally debated according to the effects on society as a whole, not specifically on the most marginalized; thus, the potential benefits of a basic income for marginalized groups is unclear. To address this gap, I identify homeless people in Germany as the least advantaged and assess how this group would be impacted by a basic income based on real libertarian, liberal egalitarian, and republican theories of justice. Specifically, I show how introducing a basic income would affect the homeless population in Germany in terms of income, self-respect, and power. While a basic income could increase most of the homeless population ’s income and improve communal relations, the stigma attached to homelessness will only decrease insofar as the basic income policy helps people exit homelessness. Moreover, a basic income would decrease power imbalances between the homeless population and state agencies, but the policy’s effects on relations between homeless persons and fellow citizens, particularly landlords, are ambiguous. This article contributes to the theoretical discussion on a basic income, providing a new concern about whether such a policy is fair to the homeless population. Moreover, this article is relevant in practice, as the discussed effects may prompt avenues for designing future social policies that address the homeless population as the most vulnerable group in modern welfare states." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
(How) Would You Continue Working? A Comparison of Responses to the Lottery Question and a Basic Income Question (2025)
Zitatform
Posch, Melina, Joachim Hüffmeier, Ali Cevik, Juliane John & Hannes Zacher (2025): (How) Would You Continue Working? A Comparison of Responses to the Lottery Question and a Basic Income Question. In: Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Jg. 69, H. 1, S. 1-14. DOI:10.1026/0932-4089/a000434
Abstract
"The introduction of a basic income (BI) is a controversial topic. A key psychological question is whether most employees would stop or, as suggested by lottery question research, continue working. We addressed this question through two surveys with 268 and 640 employees, examining their plans regarding working if they won the lottery (lottery question) or received a monthly BI (BI question) as well as their reasons for continuing to work. More than 90 % (Study 1) and more than 80 % (Study 2) of respondents planned to continue working in both scenarios. In response to the BI question, more participants indicated they would continue working as before and fewer planned to pursue a different kind of work or to stop working. Financial reasons to continue working were reported more frequently in response to the BI question. Our findings suggest that the generalizability of lottery question research to the BI is limited, which necessitates specific research on the BI." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Anreizkompatibilität eines Grundeinkommens (2025)
Zitatform
Prinz, Aloys L. (2025): Anreizkompatibilität eines Grundeinkommens. In: Ordo : Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Jg. 74, H. 1, S. 68-101. DOI:10.1515/ordo-2025-2006
Abstract
"Die Diskussion um eine bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen hat wieder an Fahrt gewonnen. Neben theoretischen Analysen der Arbeitsanreizeffekte stehen neuerdings Simulationen und Experimente als Methoden zur Erweiterung der Kenntnisse über die Wirkungen eines bedingungslosen Grundeinkommens zur Verfügung. In diesem Beitrag wird die Analyse der Anreizeffekte über diejenigen auf das Arbeitsangebot hinaus auf die Zeitallokation ausgedehnt. Insbesondere wird auf die Bedeutung der Befähigung (Capabilities) der Personen und Haushalte hinsichtlich der Zeitverwendung hingewiesen, die für eine effektive und effiziente Zeitallokation erforderlich ist. Darüber hinaus werden die Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Simulationsstudie und des finnischen Grundeinkommensexperimentes hinsichtlich der Anreizeffekte von Grundeinkommensvarianten diskutiert." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku, © De Gruyter)
-
Literaturhinweis
Macroeconomic Observations on Paying for and Funding Universal Basic Income (2025)
Zitatform
Sawyer, Malcolm (2025): Macroeconomic Observations on Paying for and Funding Universal Basic Income. In: Basic Income Studies, Jg. 19, H. 2, S. 227-252. DOI:10.1515/bis-2023-0032
Abstract
"The paper undertakes macroeconomic analysis of Universal Basic Income (UBI). It focuses on issues of paying for and the funding of universal basic income. A number of proposals are examined and the limitations of borrowing and money creation for the funding of UBI are indicated. It is generally argued that funding of UBI should be examined in terms of funding through taxation. The effects of UBI on employment and national output and the macroeconomic limits on the scale on UBI in terms of work force participation and tax rates are investigated." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))