Springe zum Inhalt

Veranstaltungsreihe: IAB-Colloquium

Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler die Ergebnisse ihrer Forschungsarbeit vor und diskutieren diese mit Expertinnen und Experten aus dem IAB. Auch Interessierte aus Arbeitsverwaltung, Politik und Praxis sind willkommen.

The California Policy Lab (CPL) is part of a growing number of research centers in the United States that do applied economic research in partnership with local or state government agencies. The goals of such long-term research partnerships is to work on problems that are directly policy relevant, help implement relevant findings, and integrate administrative data that otherwise would be difficult to access. The presentation reviews CPL’s approach to government partnerships and reviews examples of joint research projects, including nudge experiments, predictive work on homelessness, COVID-19 related projects, with particular focus on studies of unemployment insurance benefits

This paper studies the adoption of local preferences and norms by refugees over time. Exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in the allocation of refugees across German regions between 2013 and 2018, we examine the path of their convergence towards local culture in the short-run. We assemble a novel data set on values, habits, and preferences for 8,000 refugees, and combine it with information on more than 34,000 locals. We find strong evidence that refugees converge to local culture, closing the gap by 5% every year. This effect is stronger for regions whose culture is more distinct from the national one and more internally homogeneous. We also provide evidence that refugees' cultural convergence is faster where support for anti-immigrant parties is stronger, where there are more hate-crimes against refugees, and where locals are less open to diversity - patterns consistent with what we label the ``threat hypothesis''. Despite the positive effect of a threatening environment on the pace of refugees' cultural convergence, we document that the former slows down their economic integration.

Nachhaltigkeit ist ein gesellschaftliches Ziel, dem sich immer Organisationen explizit verschreiben. Wichtige Treiber sind hierfür gleichermaßen das äußere Umfeld wie auch die Impulse der eigenen Mitarbeitenden. Doch was ist Nachhaltigkeit und wie lässt sich dieses Ziel mit einer organisationsspezifischen Strategie befördern? Der Vortrag greift diese Frage auf und behandelt ausgewählte Aspekte und Instrumente bei der Erarbeitung einer Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Neben Fragen der Stakeholder-Identifikation und Einbindung geht es auch um die Analyse wesentlicher Handlungsfelder sowie möglicher Methoden zur Organisation und Kommunikation von Nachhaltigkeit. Der Vortrag lädt bewusst zur Interaktion ein und möchte Impulse für die weitere Diskussion am IAB geben.

Employment and Social Developments in Europe (ESDE) 2020: “Leaving no one behind and striving for more: fairness and solidarity in the European social market economy”

The review provides evidence-based analysis on how to achieve greater fairness across the EU in the face of crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and of long-term challenges arising from structural change due to demographic ageing, climate change and digitalisation.

The COVID-19 pandemic is having profound health, economic, employment and social effects, hitting society’s most vulnerable disproportionately hard and threatening much of the progress that the EU had achieved previously in labour markets and social outcomes. Against this background, this year’s ESDE analyses the state of play of and challenges to social fairness and inclusivity of growth in the EU. It also explores specific policies and tools that can improve the prospects of greater social fairness and enhanced solidarity in the future. ESDE provides evidence-based groundwork for the reflection on how policy can help achieve recovery and further normalisation while meeting Europeans’ expectations regarding fairness and solidarity.

We analyze workers' risk preferences and training investments. Our conceptual framework differentiates between the investment risk and insurance mechanisms underpinning training decisions. Investment risk leads risk-averse workers to train less; they undertake more training if it insures them against future losses. We use the German Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP) to demonstrate that risk-affinity is associated with more training, implying that, on average, investment risks dominate the insurance benefits of training. Crucially, this relationship is evident only for general training; there is no relationship between risk attitudes and specific training. Thus, as expected, risk preferences matter more when skills are transferable - and workers have a vested interest in training outcomes - than when they are not. Finally, we provide evidence that the insurance benefits of training are concentrated among workers with uncertain employment relationships or limited access to public insurance schemes.

The wage gap between newly arriving immigrants and comparable natives in the United States has widened substantially over the last few decades while the subsequent speed of convergence has declined. These patterns have led to a pessimistic view regarding wage assimilation prospects of immigrants. This paper unravels an unexplored mechanism that can explain an important part of these regularities: labor market competition. Because immigrants and natives are imperfect substitutes in production, increasing immigrant inflows exert stronger labor market competition on previous cohorts of immigrants than on natives, contributing to a widening wage gap. We quantify the importance of this mechanism using a model that accounts for the main features of the literatures on the wage impact of immigration and immigrant wage assimilation. Our results suggest that, if competition and composition effects are netted out, immigrant cohorts are more positively selected in recent decades, with these differences disappearing after 10 years, implying a lower relative wage growth for recent cohorts.

In this paper, we investigate wage losses from displacement in the manufacturing sector. We start by documenting that manufacturing firms traditionally employed low- and high-wage workers (measured as an AKM worker fixed effect) in similar proportions and paid substantial wage premiums (measured as an AKM firm fixed effect) to both types of workers. Over time, manufacturing jobs disproportionally disappeared over time, particularly so for low wage workers. We find that even though low and high wage workers suffer similar wage losses upon displacement on average, low wage workers experience substantially larger losses in their firm wage premiums, in part because they are more likely to move out of manufacturing and into low knowledge service sectors where firm wage premiums are low. Wage losses and losses in firm wage premiums upon displacement have increased over time especially for low wage workers, in part because low wage workers are increasingly re-employed in low knowledge service jobs.

This paper presents first evidence for the opposing effects of imports and exports at the extensive and intensive employment margins. While soaring imports from China are associated with a higher probability of plant closure, exports have the opposite effect. Imports work through the extensive margin of plant closure only, whereas exports have an effect on employment through both margins. Plant closures occur at a lower probability in labor market segments with heightened export opportunities and these plants tend to expand employment. Moreover, we analyze potential interaction effects. Our analysis shows that i) lower domestic competition reduces the impact of both imports and exports on the probability of plant closure, ii) plants with higher productivity are less likely to react to the import shock and iii) a higher routine-task intensity favors the selection of plants due to import competition.

We study whether women and men cope with job loss differently. We use 2006-2017 Dutch administrative monthly microdata and a quasi-experimental design involving job displacement because of firm bankruptcy. We find that displaced women are more likely than displaced men to take up a flexible job with limited working hours and short commutes. However, displaced women experience longer unemployment durations and comparable hourly wage losses. Displaced expectant mothers experience relatively high losses in employment and working hours. Our findings suggest that the costs of job flexibility for displaced female workers come through longer unemployment instead of higher losses in wages.

With rapid advancements in automation technology and artificial intelligence (AI), the question of how technological changes affect work has regained attention in recent decades. Similar to fears in earlier times, policy makers, the public and scientists alike are concerned about technology-driven job losses. While there is little evidence suggesting that predictions of disappearing work will materialize anytime soon, it is also clear that the nature of work is changing rapidly, demanding high degrees of adaptability of workers. We use administrative, individual-level panel data for West Germany from 1990 to 2005 to examine how workers have navigated the labor market in recent decades. To frame our empirical analysis, we construct a simple model of workers' decisions regarding the tasks they perform and occupational mobility in the face of changing task content of production. We find that workers alter the tasks they perform at the workplace and also use occupational mobility to adjust to those changing demands. The results also suggest that resilient workers forgo wage increases but, instead, experience higher future employment stability.