Springe zum Inhalt

We analyse who falls victim of crime, the immediate and long term consequences of victimization for victims and their families and the heterogeneity in these effects using rare administrative data on the population of reported victims in Denmark. Victims are more likely to grow up in disadvantaged environments and to be of lower SES. Moreover, victimization has long-lasting negative effects on the labor market outcomes of victims, and these effects are larger and more persistent for female than for male victims. 

This talk will summarize two studies, which respectively study the role of caseworkers and public employment services for the labor market outcomes of unemployment benefit recipients. A first study asks whether and how much caseworkers matter for the outcomes of unemployed individuals. It exploits exogenous variation in unplanned absences among Swiss unemployment insurance caseworkers. A second study evaluates a large-scale policy change in which the public employment service of one Swiss canton changed its strategy by removing restrictions on job search and granting increased autonomy to job seekers.

Ein Teil der hier dargestellten Tabellen wurde als ergänzende Information zu dem folgenden, im IAB-Forum erschienenen Beitrag erstellt: 

(Beste, Jonas; Trappmann, Mark (2021): Die materielle Versorgung von Hartz-IV-Haushalten hat sich in den letzten Jahren etwas verbessert, deren relative Einkommenssituation nicht, In: IAB-Forum vom 17. Februar 2021). 

Dort finden Sie weiterführende Hinweise zu den verwendeten Daten und Methoden. Bitte beachten Sie, dass die Werte mit statistischer Unsicherheit behaftet sind. Aus diesem Grund wurden zusätzlich Konfidenzintervalle ausgewiesen, die über das Ausmaß der Unsicherheit Auskunft geben.

Is corona the great leveller? Rich or poor, everyone can get sick from the virus. The measures to deal with the pandemic affect everyone equally: We all wear masks and the lockdown banishes us all to our homes. Or is corona an amplifier of existing and a cause for new inequalities? Important social and economic resources for coping with burdens, economic risks and availability of support by the welfare state are unequally distributed.

At the same time, new and old social divides are breaking open: Parents, especially working parents, face a particular burden in view of the closures of schools and childcare facilities and must often take over the schooling and care of children themselves. Also, people in large cities might be more affected by the crisis than people outside metropolitan areas. But the crisis also contributes to inequalities directly in the labor market: Many of the workers affected by the closures are found in the food service and personal services industries. But those particularly affected also include already disadvantaged groups such as temporary and marginal workers, who are more often in danger of losing their jobs and have less access to social protection. Low-income earners and people living in poverty may suffer particularly from the restrictions, as they have significantly fewer resources to cope with stress or deal with new challenges like home schooling. They may even be hit more often directly by the virus if they have to economize on personal protective measures. Similarly, self-employed face also specific challenges as they have often limited funding and assistance programs were not tailored to this group. At the same time, international comparisons reveal differences – not only are countries affected by the pandemic to varying degrees, but the economic and social consequences are also uneven. This raises the question of the role of social security systems and the labor market and economic policy responses.

Shortly after the pandemic, many researchers turned their attention to such and similar questions, and initial results were available in a short time. After a year of research, however, it is also clear that the observed effects of the crisis are not always uniform, but can differ significantly by the dimensions of inequality under study, by country, and also among different groups of people. In addition, aspects of data collection or measurement and the resulting possibilities for analysis are also likely to play a role. Against this background, this seminar series aims to bring together empirically rigorous contributions from the fields of sociology, economics and related fields on issues of social policy, social ad economic inequality following the Corona Crisis.

We estimate heterogeneous returns to a STEM education in Switzerland based on individual-level data, exploiting the regional distribution of relative distances to technical and cantonal universities as a cost factor driving college major choice.

Overall, individuals strongly gain in terms of earnings by graduating from a STEM major, with equally large effects for men and women. Ascending Marginal Treatment Effect curves suggest heterogeneous returns while inverse selection on gains implies that individuals with a higher resistance for a STEM education gain the most, where the latter emerges stronger for men. Eventually, we utilize the recent formation of the University of Lucerne, changing relative distances, to estimate the policy-relevant treatment effect for a counterfactual scenario that this university had been established as a technical one: people shifted into a STEM education significantly gain in terms of earnings, with stronger effects for men.

Junge Unternehmen sind besonders verletzlich, denn sie benötigen einige Zeit, um sich zu etablieren und Rücklagen für schlechte Zeiten bilden zu können. Gerade in einer Rezession sind sie besonders wichtig, denn sie schaffen neue Arbeitsplätze und befördern den wirtschaftsstrukturellen Wandel. Ergebnisse einer Sonderbefragung des IAB/ZEW-Gründungspanel vom April 2020 zeigen ein differenziertes Bild. Gründungen reagieren stärker auf die Krise als etablierte Unternehmen – das gilt im Guten wie im Schlechten. Im Online-Workshop werden die Auswirkungen der Covid-19-Pandemie auf das Gründungsgeschehen diskutiert.