Springe zum Inhalt

Publikation

Evaluating welfare reform in an era of transition

Beschreibung

"With the passing of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996, the United States embarked on a major social experiment with its social welfare and safety net programs for the poor. The most far-reaching reform of the cash welfare system for single mothers since 1935, PRWORA replaced the federal entitlement program for low-income families and children (Aid to Families with Dependent Children, AFDC) with a stateadministered block grant program, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). Determining the consequences of this experiment is of great importance. Has welfare reform 'worked?' What were the effects of the reforms on families and individuals? What reforms worked for whom and why? In looking toward the development of new policies to aid low-income families, which elements of the new welfare system need to be changed and which left as is? For these fundamental questions to be answered adequately, two issues need to be addressed. First, how should one go about answering these questions what methods should be used and what types of studies should be conducted in order to determine the effects of welfare reform? Second, what types of data are needed to measure the effects of welfare reform? Are federal and state data sources currently available sufficient to carry out needed evaluations, and, if not, what investments in that infrastructure are needed? These two issues are the subject of this report." (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitationshinweis

Moffitt, Robert A. & Michele ver Ploeg (Hrsg.) (2001): Evaluating welfare reform in an era of transition. Panel on data and methods for measuring the effects of changes in social welfare programs. Washington: National Academy Press, 253 S.