Springe zum Inhalt

Publikation

In-office imaging capabilities among procedure-based specialty practices

Beschreibung

"Stark law's in-office ancillary services exception permits physicians to furnish designated health services in the office, including advanced imaging.<br> Objectives: To determine whether arrangements tailored to fit this loophole spur utilization.<br> Research design: Cross-sectional.<br> Subjects: Procedure-based specialty clinics participating in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.<br> Measures: Using restricted data files (2006-2008), we identified specialty practices with on-site advanced imaging capabilities (ie, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or positron emission tomography). We then characterized these practices and the physicians who worked in them over a variety of factors. Finally, we performed multivariable regression to evaluate the association between imaging use and the availability of in-office imaging.<br> Results: Fourteen percent of practices performed advanced imaging on site. While this proportion remained stable over the study period for most specialties, it rose significantly among orthopedic surgery clinics from 13.6% to 31.3% (P = .023 for the temporal trend). The availability of advanced imaging varied by practice organization and size. For instance, 32.6% of large single-specialty groups provided in-office imaging as compared to only 10.1% of solo/partnership practices. While less than a quarter of specialty visits were made to practices that offered advanced imaging, these locations generated a third of all advanced imaging studies. In fact, 1 in 11 visits (9.0%; 95% confidence interval = 6.8% to 11.6%; P = .030) to them resulted in advanced imaging.<br> Conclusions: The availability of in-office advanced imaging is associated with increased imaging use." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitationshinweis

Hollingsworth, John M., Joseph Sakshaug, Yun Zhang & Brent K. Hollenbeck (2014): In-office imaging capabilities among procedure-based specialty practices. In: Surgical innovation, Jg. 21, H. 4, S. 403-408. DOI:10.1177/1553350613505715