Street-level judgements about welfare deservingness
Beschreibung
"This article examines how jobcentre advisors judge the individual deservingness of their clients and investigates what role these judgements play in translating activation policies into practice. The analysis draws on qualitative data gathered in a research project on back-to-work agreements that involved several German jobcentres. It is shown that advisors vary the intensity of ‘demand’ depending on whether benefit recipients fulfil reciprocity expectations and are deemed to have control over the unemployment situation. Whether or not they choose an enabling, supporting approach, and the extent to which they do so, depends on judgements about the client’s amenability to change and the presumed outcome of labour market policy instruments. Moreover, the analysis indicates that frontline workers use experiential cues such as appearance and self-presentation in the face-to-face encounters in order to interpret the client. The findings highlight the relevance of the normative dimension of frontline work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Zitationshinweis
Senghaas, Monika (2021): Street-level judgements about welfare deservingness. How jobcentre advisors decide about the individual mix of ‘support’ and ‘demand’ in the delivery of activation policies. In: Social Policy and Society, Jg. 20, H. 3, S. 385-399. DOI:10.1017/S1474746420000408