Veranstaltungsformat: Hybrid

Most studies estimating the gender wage gap rely on linear regression of log hourly earnings.  Estimates often condition on potentially endogenous regressors such as labour market experience and family formation.  Exploiting prospective data on a cohort born in 1958 we estimate the gender wage gap over the life-course between age 23 and 63, departing from the literature in two ways.  First, we use matching estimators which are rarely used in the literature.  Like regression analyses matching relies on observed data to recover the effect of gender on earnings, but by explicitly considering the issue of common support it is more transparent in its treatment of men as counterfactuals for women.  We examine the importance of the common support issue for the size of the gender wage gap.  Second, we condition on pre-labour market variables to avoid conditioning on endogenous choice variables, such as family formation, which are made, in part, with knowledge regarding one’s potential earnings.  We argue our data are well-suited to the task because they contain a wide array of prospective data collected at birth, then at ages 7, 11 and 16, which might conceivably confound estimates of the GWG.  In contrast to findings in the literature in which the regression-adjusted GWG is considerably smaller than the raw gap, we find differences in log hourly mean earnings between men and women are of roughly similar size and, in some cases, wider than raw gaps conditioning on pre-labour market variables.  This is the case whether we use matching or linear estimation techniques. However, the PSM estimated GWG is above the raw gap when cohort members are in their 40s, 50s and 60s.  The implication is that women have pre-labour market traits which reduce their earnings later in life relative to men.  The gap follows an inverted-u shape over the life-course, reaching its maximum of around. .45 log points at age 42, after which it begins to decline, though it remains large among cohort members in their 60s.

Joint work with: Francesca Foliano, Heather Joshi, Bozena Wielgoszewska and David Wilkinson

In this study, we examine how the same vacating opportunity translates differently for male and female full-time workers. By utilizing matched employer-employee data from Germany, our empirical approach leverages 30,000 unforeseen worker deaths spanning from 1980 to 2016 which enables us to explore how firms react to exogenous vacancies. We find that when a position becomes vacant, female replacements have starting wages that are 20 log points lower compared to their male counterparts. Even after considering the pre-hire wage of replacement workers, half of this gap persists. The gender disparity in opportunities cannot be attributed to workload redistribution among other coworkers. Over time, the gap tends to widen on average and remains stable even for those who remain employed full-time in the subsequent five years after being hired.​

Increasing diversity is one of the challenges in modern labor markets. Increased representation, participation and inclusion in the workplace may not only desirable from a societal or political, but also from an economic perspective. The lack of diversity has been documented to be particularly salient in the academic sector. In this paper, we address the question whether diversity in the workforce increases in the absence of diversity-targeted policy interventions when academic labor markets become tighter. We focus on the German academic labor market for professors which has been characterized as a slack labor market with an over-representation of males in which closed networks play an important role. To study market forces, we explore two natural experiments that unexpectedly increased labor demand and led to tighter labor markets for professors. First, using newly digitized data from the German Federal Statistical Office on academic staff during the German university expansion in the 1960s and 70s, we document an increase in the share of female professors from 0.62 percent in 1960 to 4.39 percent in 1977. Second, we explore between-discipline variation in staff replacements at universities in East Germany after the reunification. Using administrative data on university staff, we find that nine years after the fall of the German wall professors are significantly younger in the Social Sciences (strongly affected by replacements) compared to STEM subjects (barely affected), in the East relative to the West. There is no respective significant change in the share of female professors. However, professors have a more diverse academic background as measured by their university of habilitation. Taken together, our analyses demonstrate that positive labor demand shocks indeed have the ability to contribute to more diversity in academia in some dimensions and, by market force and in the absence of targeted policy interventions, break up some of the "Old-Boys' Club’'.