Skip to content

Veranstaltungsformat: Hybrid

In this study, we examine how the same vacating opportunity translates differently for male and female full-time workers.

In this study, we examine how the same vacating opportunity translates differently for male and female full-time workers. By utilizing matched employer-employee data from Germany, our empirical approach leverages 30,000 unforeseen worker deaths spanning from 1980 to 2016 which enables us to explore how firms react to exogenous vacancies. We find that when a position becomes vacant, female replacements have starting wages that are 20 log points lower compared to their male counterparts. Even after considering the pre-hire wage of replacement workers, half of this gap persists. The gender disparity in opportunities cannot be attributed to workload redistribution among other coworkers. Over time, the gap tends to widen on average and remains stable even for those who remain employed full-time in the subsequent five years after being hired.​

We study the role of labor market beliefs in the gender pay gap. We find that, on average, women expect to receive lower salaries than men and also expect to receive fewer offers when employed. 

We study the role of labor market beliefs in the gender pay gap. We find that, on average, women expect to receive lower salaries than men and also expect to receive fewer offers when employed. Gender differences in expectations explain a sizable fraction of the residual gap in reservation wages. We estimate a partial equilibrium job search model that incorporates worker heterogeneity in beliefs about the wage offer distribution, arrival rates, and separation rate. Counterfactual exercises show that labor market beliefs play an important role in the gender wage gap, but matter little for the gender differences in welfare. Eliminating gender differences in the actual offer distribution, by contrast, decreases the gender gap in pay and welfare.

Numerous governments provide income-contingent childcare subsidies.

Numerous governments provide income-contingent childcare subsidies. In this paper, we estimate the dynamic marginal efficiency cost of redistribution (MECR) associated with a large-scale program of this kind in Germany, and compare them with the MECR associated with the benchmark redistributive tool, the income tax. To do so, we integrate methods from public finance theory into a dynamic structural heterogeneous-household model of childcare demand and maternal labor supply. We also incorporate social mobility concerns into the MECR and find the MECR of the childcare subsidies to be significantly lower at the margin, suggesting that childcare subsidies are the more efficient redistributive tool.

This lecture is about how artificial intelligence can be used to reduce friction in markets.

We explore how Artificial Intelligence can be leveraged to help frictional markets to clear. We design a collaborative-filtering machine-learning job recommender system that uses job seekers' click history to generate relevant personalised job recommendations. We deploy it at scale on the largest online job board in Sweden, and design a clustered two-sided randomised experiment to evaluate its impact on job search and labour-market outcomes. Combining platform data with unemployment and employment registers, we find that treated job seekers are more likely to click and apply to recommended jobs, and have 0.7 percent higher employment within the 6 months following first exposure to recommendations. At the job-worker pair level, we document that recommending a vacancy to a job seeker increases the probability to work at this workplace by 10 percent. We propose a decomposition exercise of the net employment effects into three channels. The most important channel corresponds to the increase in the number of applications due to recommendations (first channel), partly offset by the lower conversion into employment of marginal applications (second channel). Congestion effects (third channel) are not a significant contributor to the overall effect. We also find larger employment effects when recommended vacancies are less popular, and for recommendations that broaden search further away in geographical and occupational distance.

We study how online job search advice affects the job search strategies and labor market outcomes of unemployed workers.

We study how online job search advice affects the job search strategies and labor market outcomes of unemployed workers. In a large-scale field experiment, we provide job seekers with vacancy information and occupational recommendations on an online dashboard. A two-stage randomized design with regionally varying treatment intensities allows us to account for treatment spillovers. Our results show that online advice is highly effective when the share of treated workers is relatively low: in regions where less than less than 50% of job seekers are exposed to treatment, working hours and earnings of treated job seekers increase significantly in the year after the intervention. At the same time, we find substantial negative spillovers on other treated job seekers for higher treatment intensities, resulting from increased competition between treated job seekers who apply for similar vacancies.

This paper questions the design of job recommender systems (RS).

This paper questions the design of job recommender systems (RS). We argue that state of the art ML-based algorithmic recommendations aimed at identifying a hiring score from past successful matches do not always result in improved outcomes for job seekers (JS). This is because first, the objectives of these recommendations do not align with the ones of the JS and second, they are usually generated independently of each other, without considering competition. Using a theoretical model of a two-sided market with an application stage, we discuss the needs that RS should meet. We then show that the ML-based hiring score, from which recommendations are typically derived, is only one of the necessary ingredients to meet these needs. Additionally, a matching score between JS and job offer profiles must be considered, and the two should be combined to form a criterion that reflects the expected utility. Our empirical analysis confirms this quantitatively matters, using the RS designed as part of a long-term project in collaboration with the French Public Employment Service. This project leverages extensive and detailed data on applicants, firms, and past job searches. Moreover, we discuss how optimal transport can be leveraged to design RS that avoid congestion, viewing the recommendations as a collective problem rather than a series of individual programs.

EU Eastern Enlargement elicited a rise in (temporary) labour market oriented immigration to Germany starting in May 2011. Taking into account that not all immigrants stay permanently and that outmigration flows are selective, this paper classifies recent EU immigrants into “new arrivals” and “stayers” drawing on administrative social security data (2005-2017). This novel strategy allows us to separately identify their potentially opposing short- and medium-run effects on labour market outcomes in Germany. We find a transitory negative wage effect among German nationals, particularly at the bottom of the wage distribution; and a permanent positive effect on full-time employment.

We address the question whether diversity in the workforce increases in the absence of diversity-targeted policy interventions when academic labor markets become tighter.

Increasing diversity is one of the challenges in modern labor markets. Increased representation, participation and inclusion in the workplace may not only desirable from a societal or political, but also from an economic perspective. The lack of diversity has been documented to be particularly salient in the academic sector. In this paper, we address the question whether diversity in the workforce increases in the absence of diversity-targeted policy interventions when academic labor markets become tighter. We focus on the German academic labor market for professors which has been characterized as a slack labor market with an over-representation of males in which closed networks play an important role. To study market forces, we explore two natural experiments that unexpectedly increased labor demand and led to tighter labor markets for professors. First, using newly digitized data from the German Federal Statistical Office on academic staff during the German university expansion in the 1960s and 70s, we document an increase in the share of female professors from 0.62 percent in 1960 to 4.39 percent in 1977. Second, we explore between-discipline variation in staff replacements at universities in East Germany after the reunification. Using administrative data on university staff, we find that nine years after the fall of the German wall professors are significantly younger in the Social Sciences (strongly affected by replacements) compared to STEM subjects (barely affected), in the East relative to the West. There is no respective significant change in the share of female professors. However, professors have a more diverse academic background as measured by their university of habilitation. Taken together, our analyses demonstrate that positive labor demand shocks indeed have the ability to contribute to more diversity in academia in some dimensions and, by market force and in the absence of targeted policy interventions, break up some of the "Old-Boys' Club’'.

Can weather events predict migration choices of 140,000+ individuals?

Existing work presents mixed findings on the impact of weather events on international mobility. Relying on fine-grained data over 1980-2018 in the Mexico-U.S. setting, we turn to machine learning (ML) tools to first determine if weather events can predict migration choices of 140,000+ individuals. We use random-forest models which allow us to include a comprehensive list of weather indicators measured at various lags and to consider complex interactions among the inputs. These models rely on data-driven model selection, optimize predictive performance, but often produce ‘black-box’ results. In our case, the results show that weather indicators offer at best a modest improvement in migration predictions. We then attempt to open the black box and model the linkages between select weather indicators and migration choices. We find the combination of precipitation and temperature extremes and their sequencing to be crucial to predicting weather-driven migration responses out of Mexico. We also show heterogeneity in these responses by household wealth status. Specifically, we find that wealthier households in rural communities migrate in the immediate aftermath of a negative weather shock (relative to the ‘normal’ weather in their community), while poorer households need to experience consecutive and worsening shocks to migrate to the United States. This pattern suggests that migration as an adaptation strategy might be available to select households in the developing world.

This lecture investigates the most durable positive consequences of tight labor markets and focus on the mechanisms that produce positive outcomes.

Most research on poverty focuses on the damage caused by persistent unemployment.  But what actually happens when jobs are plentiful and workers are hard to come by? Moving the Needle examines how very low unemployment boosts wages at the bottom, improves job quality, lengthens job ladders, and pulls the unemployed into a booming job market. Drawing on over seventy years of quantitative data as well as interviews with employers, jobseekers, and longtime residents of poor neighborhoods, this lecture investigates the most durable positive consequences of tight labor markets and focus on the mechanisms that produce positive outcomes: matching processes that include the dispossessed, job ladders that grow within the low wage sector, and increasing human capital that can be parlayed into internal and external upward mobility.  Dr. Newman will also consider the downside of overheated economies, which can fuel surging rents and ignite outmigration. She will conclude with a discussion of policies and practices that can sustain the benefits of tight labor markets when unemployment begins to rise.