Skip to content

This paper studies the effects of a market-level reduction in job search provided by unemployment benefit recipients.

This paper studies the effects of a market-level reduction in job search provided by unemployment benefit recipients. We exploit a market-level policy change in Switzerland, where a subset of Public Employment Services reduced the number of required applications by 25% and abolished mandatory vacancy referrals.

Using detailed administrative data and difference-in-differences designs, we find that the policy change increased the average duration of unemployment spells by about 6%, while increasing average reemployment earnings by about 2%. At the firm side, vacancy filling and posting reduced substantially.

This paper demonstrates that random dispersal policies (RDP) are not sufficient for causal identification for two reasons.

A large body of migration literature uses random dispersal policies (RDP) to estimate the importance of local factors for integration.

This paper demonstrates that RDP is not sufficient for causal identification for two reasons. First, while RDP ensures that local conditions are exogenous to immigrant characteristics, they still correlate with other observed and unobserved local factors. Second, onward mobility requires careful consideration, as it can be endogenous to factors at the initial location. We theoretically show that estimates from continuousinstruments based on RDP contain three components: the causal effect of interest, ”multiple-treatment bias” (MTB), and ”mobility bias” (MB). The extent of these biases depends on the interrelations of local factors and onward mobility, which can be partly observed. We empirically investigate these biases using novel administrative data from Germany that cover the universe of all refugees between 2013 and 2018 and feature random dispersal.

The central empirical finding is that estimates that ignore MB and MTB cannot be compared and can even change signs.

Joint: Marco Schmandt, Constantin Tielkes, Felix Weinhardt

This paper examines the incentives for firms to offer family-friendly workplace policies, focusing on firm-provided childcare.

The literature has studied the willingness to pay for family-friendly amenities, but less is known about the incentives for firms to provide these amenities. This paper examines the incentives for firms to offer family-friendly workplace policies, focusing on firm-provided childcare.

Drawing on German matched employer-employee data combined with detailed survey panel data on firms, we find that firm-provided childcare enhances retention and shortens labor market breaks for mothers, especially for high-wage mothers. It also contributes to employment growth, disproportionately driven by firms attracting female talent.

These findings can be rationalized through a stylized model of imperfect competition in the labor market, where family-friendly workplace policies are modeled as an amenity with direct production benefits.

In this model, technology substitutes the usage of skill in routine tasks in contrast to standard RBTC models.

I propose a model of a skill-replacing routine-biased technological change (SR-RBTC). In this model, technology substitutes the usage of skill in routine tasks in contrast to standard RBTC models, which assume technology replaces the workers themselves.

The SR-RBTC model explains three key trends that are inconsistent with standard RBTC models: 1) why specifically middle wages declined even though workers in routine occupations are dispersed across the entire bottom half of the wage distribution, 2) why middle wages stopped declining while the technological change continued, and 3) why there is no substantial decline in the average wage of workers inroutine occupations. I derive two new testable predictions from the model: a decreasein return to skill and a decrease in skill level in routine occupations. I use an interactive fixed-effects model to confirm both predictions.

Since SR-RBTC violates the ignorability assumption required by standard decomposition methods, I introduce a “skewness decomposition” to show that SR-RBTC is the main driver of bottom-half inequality trends.

This paper explains why Spain became the fourth most attractive country in the world for international migrants in the period 2015-2024.

International migrants choose their country of residence to maximize their utility. As a result, their choices are informative about the relative attractiveness of countries. This paper explains why Spain became the fourth most attractive country in the world for international migrants in the period 2015-2024, what I define as the Second Spanish Immigration Boom of the century.

First, an accounting decomposition shows how, contrary to other destinations, Spanish-specific factors, correlated with economic conditions and general migration policies, have a larger weight in explaining immigration to Spain than origin-specific factors. Second, the causal relevance of bilateral visa policies is also shown, particularly in the context of Latin American immigrants, by using origins that are required a visa to enter Spain as a control for visa-free access countries in a generalized differences-in-differences setting. Finally, the effects of the Boom on immigrant selection are also analyzed, finding that the Second Boom was different from the first because educational selection improved.

This talk will present findings from previous research, which explores how to effectively implement split questionnaire designs and impute the resulting data.

In light of challenges such as declining response rates and rising data collection costs, approaches like split questionnaire designs or planned missing data designs offer a promising strategy for survey projects to reduce respondent burden while still collecting data on a broad range of topics. They achieve this by administering only randomly selected parts of the full questionnaire to each respondent, effectively reducing questionnaire length for each respondent. This comes at the cost of large amounts of missing data, which must be imputed to make the data analyzable.


In this talk, I will present findings from my previous research, which explores how to effectively implement split questionnaire designs and impute the resulting data in the context of social surveys. Using Monte Carlo simulations grounded in real-world data from the German Internet Panel and the European Social Survey, I evaluate how different design and imputation choices affect the accuracy of estimates. The presentation will address key methodological questions, including how to construct questionnaire modules, how planned missingness interacts with traditional item nonresponse, and how general-purpose versus analysis-specific imputation strategies influence results. The goal is to provide practical insights and evidence-based recommendations for researchers considering split questionnaire designs in their own survey work.

This paper assesses the performance of classical strategies to control for (pre-)trends in difference-in-differences designs.

This paper assesses the performance of classical strategies to control for (pre-)trends in difference-in-differences designs.

We focus on three main approaches: controlling for or matching on pre-trends, extrapolating linear trends, and controlling for group-by-time fixed effects. Through Monte Carlo simulations using real labor market data, we examine incidental trends that may emerge due to correlations between treatment and unobserved characteristics.

Drawing on these simulations and supporting analytical results, we provide intuitive insights into the performance of these methods and further formalize the conditions that justify their application.

This study investigates how mentoring programs can be successfully scaled to transform the education system in Germany.

The shortage of skilled workers is a central challenge for the German labor market – 18% of young adults (20-34 years) do not have any occupational degree, and this proportion is up to twice as high for those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

One promising approach to tackle this challenge is through individual mentoring programs. The project team investigates how mentoring programs can be successfully scaled to transform the education system in Germany and promote social equality. Whether, and to what extent, such programs have a positive impact is crucial to the successful design of societal transformation processes. The research team is cooperating with a leading mentoring provider and conducting a randomized controlled trial with 3,000 disadvantaged young people to analyze the causal effects of mentoring. We plan to examine four key areas of scale-up: recruitment of mentors, general equilibrium effects, replacement of high-cost matching methods with machine learning, and the horizontal expansion of mentoring to vocational schools and apprentices.

The results will provide both scientific and practical insights into optimal technologies for rolling out interventions that serve societal transformation and the promotion of equal opportunities.

This study examines the relationship between local income inequality and the centre bias.

We examine the relationship between local income inequality / local income levels on the one hand, and the “centre bias” on the other. The latter refers to people’s misconception of being in the middle of the national income distribution, rather than at its more extreme ends.

Local income distributions shape perceptions of inequality because co-residents are a reference group that affects the availability of opportunities for upward and downward social comparison. Theoretically, we outline four mechanisms that could link higher and lower local income inequality and income levels to residents' perceptions of their own relative income position (exposure vs. segregation, contrast vs. assimilation). Empirically, we link geo-referenced survey data to external datasets containing information on income inequality and income levels in respondents' home municipalities. Results suggest that higher local inequality is associated with a lower “centre bias” for both poor and rich respondents, supporting an “exposure” mechanism.

With respect to poorer versus richer municipalities, we find that only by tendency, either group estimates their position in the national income distribution to be somewhat higher. However, this evidence in favor of the “assimilation” mechanism is weak.

The paper develops a theoretical framework to study the effect of minimum wages on poverty and bring this framework to the data.

We develop a theoretical framework to study the effect of minimum wages on poverty and bring this framework to the data using a detailed individual-level panel dataset combined with information on county-level minimum wages from urban China and both a first-differenced multinomial logit model and a difference-in-differences approach. We show that theoretically the impact of minimum wages on poverty is ambiguous while empirically China’s minimum wages have had a moderate yet significant poverty reducing effect.

Digging deeper, we demonstrate two countervailing mechanisms at work: higher minimum wages help pull some workers out of poverty, while simultaneously pushing a smaller number of workers into poverty. Results are robust to a wide range of sensitivity checks including using various different poverty lines, while subgroup analyses notably show that the effect of minimum wages on poverty is most pronounced for women.

Joint with:
Sylvie Démurger, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon and CNRS
Carl Lin, Bucknell University
Dewen Wang, The World Bank