-
Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe - Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 3
Hülle, S., Bömmel, N., Coban, M., Fössing, E., Kasrin, Z., Meß, A., Kasrin, Z., Özerdogan, A., Meß, A., Schiele, M., Trappmann, M., Wagemann, U., Weik, J., Wolff, J., Zabel, C. & Zins, S. (2024): Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe - Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 3. (IAB-Forschungsbericht 24/2024), Nürnberg, 98 p. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FB/2424
-
Evaluation des Teilhabechancengesetzes - Abschlussbericht
Achatz, J., Bauer, F., Bennett, J., Bömmel, N., Coban, M., Dietz, M., Englert, K., Fuchs, P., Gellermann, J., Globisch, C., Hülle, S., Kasrin, Z., Kupka, P., Nivorozhkin, A., Osiander, C., Pohlan, L., Promberger, M., Raab, M., Ramos Lobato, P., Schels, B., Schiele, M., Trappmann, M., Tübbicke, S., Wenzig, C., Wolff, J., Zins, S. & Zabel, C. (2024): Evaluation des Teilhabechancengesetzes - Abschlussbericht. (IAB-Forschungsbericht 04/2024), Nürnberg, 331 p. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FB.2404
-
Assessing and Improving Data Quality in Linked Panel Surveys - With a Focus on Panel and Linkage Consent (Bias)
Hülle, S. (2024): Assessing and Improving Data Quality in Linked Panel Surveys - With a Focus on Panel and Linkage Consent (Bias). Bielefeld, 197 p. DOI:10.4119/unibi/2992206
-
Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe - Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 2
Hülle, S., Bömmel, N., Coban, M., Fössing, E., Friedrich, M., Gricevic, Z., Kasrin, Z., Kleinemeier, R., Meß, A., Schiele, M., Trappmann, M., Wagemann, U., Wenzig, C., Wolff, J., Zabel, C. & Zins, S. (2023): Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe - Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 2. (IAB-Forschungsbericht 20/2023), Nürnberg, 97 p. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FB.2320
-
Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe – Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 1
Hülle, S., Achatz, J., Coban, M., Friedrich, M., Gricevic, Z., Kiesel, M., Kleinemeier, R., Meß, A., Schels, B., Trappmann, M., Wagemann, U., Wenzig, C., Wolff, J., Zabel, C. & Zins, S. (2022): Panel Lebensqualität und Teilhabe – Feld- und Methodenbericht der Welle 1. (IAB-Forschungsbericht 08/2022), Nürnberg, 148 p. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FB.2208
-
Evaluation der Förderinstrumente nach §16e und §16i SGB II – Zwischenbericht
Bauer, F., Bennett, J., Coban, M., Dietz, M., Friedrich, M., Fuchs, P., Gellermann, J., Globisch, C., Gottwald, M., Gricevic, Z., Hülle, S., Kiesel, M., Kupka, P., Nivorozhkin, A., Promberger, M., Raab, M., Ramos Lobato, P., Schmucker, A., Stockinger, B., Trappmann, M., Wenzig, C., Wolff, J., Zabel, C. & Zins, S. (2021): Evaluation der Förderinstrumente nach §16e und §16i SGB II – Zwischenbericht. (IAB-Forschungsbericht 03/2021), Nürnberg, 197 p.
-
Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Labor Market Surveys at the German Institute for Employment Research
Sakshaug, J., Beste, J., Coban, M., Fendel, T., Haas, G., Hülle, S., Kosyakova, Y., König, C., Kreuter, F., Küfner, B., Müller, B., Osiander, C., Schwanhäuser, S., Stephan, G., Vallizadeh, E., Volkert, M., Wenzig, C., Westermeier, C., Zabel, C. & Zins, S. (2020): Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Labor Market Surveys at the German Institute for Employment Research. In: Survey research methods, Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 229-233. DOI:10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7743
-
Panel survey recruitment with or without interviewers?
Sakshaug, J., Hülle, S., Schmucker, A. & Liebig, S. (2020): Panel survey recruitment with or without interviewers? Implications for nonresponse, panel consent, and total recruitment bias. In: Journal of survey statistics and methodology, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 540-565. DOI:10.1093/jssam/smz012
-
"Erwartungen an Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft" - Legitimation of inequality over the life-span
Adriaans, J., Eisnecker, P., Hülle, S., Klassen, J., Liebig, S. & Valet, P. (2019): "Erwartungen an Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft" - Legitimation of inequality over the life-span. Feldbericht und Codebuch zur zweiten Welle (LINOS-2). (Data documentation 97), Berlin, 343 p.
-
Evaluation der Förderinstrumente für Langzeitarbeitslose (§ 16e & § 16i SGB II)
Bauer, F., Dietz, M., Hülle, S., Kupka, P., Promberger, M., Ramos Lobato, P., Stockinger, B., Trappmann, M., Wolff, J. & Zabel, C. (2019): Evaluation der Förderinstrumente für Langzeitarbeitslose (§ 16e & § 16i SGB II). Zusammenfassung des IAB-Untersuchungskonzepts. Nürnberg, 14 p.
-
The employee survey "Expectations towards Economy and Society" -Legitimation of inequality over the life-span
Adriaans, J., Eisnecker, P., Hülle, S., Klassen, J., Liebig, S. & Valet, P. (2019): The employee survey "Expectations towards Economy and Society" -Legitimation of inequality over the life-span. Codebook for the second wave (LINOS-2). (Data documentation 98), Berlin, 200 p. DOI:10.25652/diwdataS0017.1
-
Exploring the effects of interviewer- and self-administered survey modes on record linkage consent rates and bias
Sakshaug, J., Hülle, S., Schmucker, A. & Liebig, S. (2017): Exploring the effects of interviewer- and self-administered survey modes on record linkage consent rates and bias. In: Survey research methods, Vol. 11, No. 2, p. 171-188. DOI:10.18148/srm/2017.v11i2.7158
-
Measuring attitudes toward distributive justice
Hülle, S., Liebig, S. & May, M. (2018): Measuring attitudes toward distributive justice. The basic social justice orientations scale. In: Social indicators research, Vol. 136, No. 2, p. 663-692. DOI:10.1007/s11205-017-1580-x
-
Principles of the Just Distribution of Benefits and Burdens: The "Basic Social Justice Orientations" Scale for Measuring Order-Related Social Justice Attitudes
Liebig, S., Hülle, S. & May, M. (2016): Principles of the Just Distribution of Benefits and Burdens: The "Basic Social Justice Orientations" Scale for Measuring Order-Related Social Justice Attitudes. (SOEPpapers on multidisciplinary panel data research at DIW Berlin 831), Berlin, 34 p.
-
Why is justice regarded as so important? Theoretical considerations and an empirical test of a fundamental question
Liebig, S., Sauer, C. & Hülle, S. (2015): Why is justice regarded as so important? Theoretical considerations and an empirical test of a fundamental question. (SFB 882 working paper series 46), Bielefeld, 20 p.
-
Wages in Eastern Germany considered less fair than in the West
Liebig, S., Hülle, S. & Schupp, J. (2014): Löhne werden in Ostdeutschland weiterhin als ungerechter empfunden als im Westen. In: DIW-Wochenbericht, Vol. 81, No. 40, p. 995-1000.
-
Wages in Eastern Germany still considered more unjust than in the West
Liebig, S., Hülle, S. & Schupp, J. (2014): Wages in Eastern Germany still considered more unjust than in the West. In: DIW Economic Bulletin, Vol. 4, No. 11, p. 59-64.