Which program for whom?

Abstract

"We use a new and exceptionally rich administrative data set for Germany to evaluate the employment effects of a variety of public sponsored training programs in the early 2000s. Building on the work of Sianesi (2003, 2004), we employ propensity score matching methods in a dynamic, multiple treatment framework in order to address program heterogeneity and dynamic selection into programs. Our results suggest that in West Germany both short-term and medium-term programs show considerable employment effects for certain population subgroups but in some cases the effects are zero in the medium run. Short-term programs are surprisingly effective when compared to the traditional and more expensive longer-term programs. With a few exceptions, we find little evidence for significant positive treatment effects in East Germany. There is some evidence that the employment effects decline for older workers and for low-skilled workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Cite article

Biewen, M., Fitzenberger, B., Osikominu, A. & Waller, M. (2007): Which program for whom? Evidence on the comparative effectiveness of public sponsored training programs in Germany. (IZA discussion paper 2885), Bonn, 67 p.