The need to account for complex sampling features when analyzing establishment survey data: an illustration using the 2013 Business Research and Development Innovation Survey (BRDIS)

Abstract

"The importance of correctly accounting for complex sampling features when generating finite population inferences based on complex sample survey data sets has now been clearly established in a variety of fields, including those in both statistical and non-statistical domains. Unfortunately, recent studies of analytic error have suggested that many secondary analysts of survey data do not ultimately account for these sampling features when analyzing their data, for a variety of possible reasons (e.g., poor documentation, or a data producer may not provide the information in a public-use data set). The research in this area has focused exclusively on analyses of household survey data, and individual respondents. No research to date has considered how analysts are approaching the data collected in establishment surveys, and whether published articles advancing science based on analyses of establishment behaviors and outcomes are correctly accounting for complex sampling features. This article presents alternative analyses of real data from the 2013 Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS), and shows that a failure to account for the complex design features of the sample underlying these data can lead to substantial differences in inferences about the target population of establishments for the BRDIS." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Cite article

West, B. & Sakshaug, J. (2018): The need to account for complex sampling features when analyzing establishment survey data: an illustration using the 2013 Business Research and Development Innovation Survey (BRDIS). In: Survey Methods: Insights from the Field No. Januar 2018, p. 1-10. DOI:10.13094/SMIF-2018-00001