Zitatform

Kunze, Florian, Carolina Opitz & Ann Sophie Lauterbach (2025): Konstanzer KI-Studie 2025: Die Nutzung von Künstlicher Intelligenz in der Arbeitswelt steigt, Ungleichheiten in der Wahrnehmung bleiben weiterhin bestehen. Ergebnisbericht Juli 2025. Konstanz: KOPS Universität Konstanz, 8 S.

Abstract

"Die Nutzung von KI in der Arbeitswelt hat innerhalb eines Jahres deutlich zugenommen – gleichzeitig bleiben erhebliche Unterschiede zwischen Berufsgruppen, Bildungsniveaus und Unternehmen bestehen. In der zweiten Welle der Konstanzer KI-Studie berichten 35?% der Befragten von KI-Nutzung im Arbeitsalltag, ein Anstieg um 11 Prozentpunkte gegenüber dem Vorjahr. Trotz dieses Wachstums bleibt die Unsicherheit hoch: Ein Drittel der Beschäftigten kann weiterhin nicht einschätzen, welche Folgen KI für die eigene Arbeit haben wird. Zugleich wird der gesellschaftliche Einfluss von Automatisierung deutlich bedrohlicher wahrgenommen als die persönliche Betroffenheit. Besonders stark ist der Nutzungszuwachs in wissensintensiven Berufen, während produktionsnahe Tätigkeiten kaum aufholen. Auch die Kluft zwischen Bildungsgruppen bleibt bestehen: Beschäftigte mit hohem Bildungsabschluss nutzen KI mehr als dreimal so häufig wie jene mit niedrigem Abschluss. Zwar steigt die Bereitschaft zur Weiterbildung in allen Gruppen, strukturelle Hürden scheinen jedoch eine Angleichung zu verhindern. Auf Ebene der Organisationen verlaufen die Entwicklungen deutlich langsamer als auf individueller Ebene. Vor allem große Unternehmen investieren zunehmend in Weiterbildung und Führungskommunikation, während kleinere Organisationen kaum Veränderungen zeigen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen deutlich, dass KI ihr Potenzial nicht gleichmäßig entfaltet, sondern bestehende strukturelle Ungleichheiten eher verstärkt. Nach wie vor besteht die reale Gefahr, dass sich bestimmte Beschäftigtengruppen zunehmend vom technologischen Fortschritt abkoppeln, weil ihnen der Zugang zu KI-Nutzung, Weiterbildungsangeboten und betrieblicher Unterstützung fehlt. Daraus ergibt sich ein klarer Handlungsauftrag an Wirtschaft, Politik und Bildungseinrichtungen, um Teilhabechancen gezielt zu fördern und einer wachsenden sozialen Spaltung frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken." (Textauszug, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Kurz, D. Heinz, Strohmaier Rita & Knell Mark (2025): Technological Change: History, Theory and Measurement. A Brief Account. (JRC working papers series on labour, education and technology 2025,03), Sevilla, 66 S.

Abstract

"Technological change, an overwhelming fact in recent socioeconomic history, involves, as Joseph A. Schumpeter famously put it, “creative destruction” on a large scale: it gives rise to new goods, production methods, firms, organisations, and jobs, while rendering some received ones obsolete. Its impact extends beyond the economy and affects society, culture, politics, and the mind-set of people. While it allows solving certain problems, it causes new ones, inducing further technological change. Against this background, the paper attempts to provide a detailed, yet concise exploration of the historical evolution and measurement of technological change in economics. It touches upon various questions that have been raised since Adam Smith and by economic and social theorists after him until today living through several waves of new technologies. These questions include: (1) Which concepts and theories did the leading authors elaborate to describe and analyse the various forms of technological progress they observed? (2) Did they think that different forms of technological progress requested the elaboration of different concepts and theories – horses for courses, so to speak? (3) How do different forms of technological progress affect and are shaped by various strata and classes of society? Issues such as these have become particularly crucial in the context of the digitisation of the economy and the widespread use of AI. Finally, the paper explores the impact of emerging technologies on the established theoretical frameworks and empirical measurements of technological change, points to new measurements linked to the rise of these technologies, and evaluates their pros and cons vis-à-vis traditional approaches." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Küstermann, Leon (2025): Upgrading jobs for all: How welfare states shape differences in life satisfaction between the winners and losers of structural change. In: Socio-economic review, Jg. 23, H. 4, S. 1895-1921. DOI:10.1093/ser/mwaf029

Abstract

"Structural economic change transforms occupational structures in a way that has benefited college-educated knowledge economy workers while creating risks for workers in routine and interpersonal service jobs. However, looking beyond economic outcomes, it is striking that differences in life satisfaction between these occupational groups in some European countries are much smaller than in others. To explain this pattern, I analyze data from the European Social Survey and the European Working Conditions Survey for twenty-five countries. I show that these life satisfaction differences are smaller in countries where jobs in “losing” occupations are designed similarly to jobs in “winning” occupations. Further, I demonstrate that both social investment and social protection reduce this life satisfaction gap by equalizing job satisfaction and job design between occupational groups. Hence, my results support the argument that welfare states achieve inclusive outcomes in the context of structural economic change through their interactions with workplaces." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Abstract

"This report examines the potential for generative AI – tools that generate text, images, video or audio, such as ChatGPT, Copilot and Midjourney – to help SMEs address labour and skill needs. It presents evidence from a representative 2024 OECD survey of over 5 000 SMEs in Austria, Canada, Germany, Ireland, Japan, Korea and the United Kingdom, on how SMEs use generative AI, how its use may be helping to address labour and skill needs, and how SMEs are preparing employees to use generative AI. The survey shows that generative AI is in use in 31% of SMEs. SMEs report that generative AI improves performance, helps compensate for skill gaps and labour shortages, and increases the need for highly-skilled workers. SMEs have concerns about copyright, legal and regulatory issues, though negative attitudes towards generative AI are rare. The findings highlight the promise of generative AI but also the need for structured policy support to close digital and skills gaps between SMEs and larger firms and to ensure that any gains from generative AI are broadly shared across the economy and the workforce." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Leitner, Sebastian & Stella Sophie Zilian (2025): Digitalisation of jobs and gender-age segregation in digital tasks: Cross-country evidence based on ESJS2 data. (WIIW working paper 269), Wien, 37 S.

Abstract

"This paper addresses the disproportional effects of digitalisation across age by investigating (i) within-job age segregation in tasks by digital intensity; (ii) within-job age disparities in digital upskilling; (iii) age inequalities in wage returns to digital job tasks; and (iv) the role of gender in this age segregation and inequalities. The analysis is based on data of Cedefop's second wave of the European Skills and Jobs Survey (ESJS2), conducted in 2021. First results of the analysis show that even when controlling for occupation-industry job pairs apart from using other explanatory variables, age segregation and gender gaps are prevalent in the case of digital skill intensity of tasks performed in the jobs of employees, though not in the case of digital upskilling via training measures. Applying the same appropriate controls, we also find that higher within-job digital skill intensity is associated with higher hourly wages. Gender wage gaps are sizable across all skill intensity categories in addition to widening in older age groups." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Logchies, Thomas, Tom Coupé & W. Robert Reed (2025): Do robots decrease humans’ wages? In: Applied Economics Letters, S. 1-5. DOI:10.1080/13504851.2025.2466748

Abstract

"While there are studies that show a positive or negative impact of robots on wages, a meta-analysis of 2,586 estimates from 52 studies in this paper finds that when one looks at the literature as a whole, there is no clear evidence of a sizable impact of robots on wages." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Lott, Yvonne & Andreas Hövermann (2025): Computer Use and Digital Frustration in German Workplaces: Is There a Gendered Part-Time Gap? In: Work, Employment and Society, Jg. 39, H. 6, S. 1440-1462. DOI:10.1177/09500170251351265

Abstract

"The digital transformation may disproportionately disadvantage female part-time workers, as they are affected by the flexibility stigma and career penalties. In this article, we ask: Is there a gendered part-time gap in work-related computer use and digital frustration in Germany? Latent class analysis and multivariate analysis, based on data from Wave 12 (2019/20) of the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) Starting Cohort 6 – Adults, showed that women – and part-time working women in particular – were less likely than men to be classified as ‘advanced users’. Furthermore, part-time working women felt least well prepared for using networked digital technologies at work and were thus more at risk of experiencing digital frustration. These findings suggest that the triadic association between technology, power and masculinity postulated by feminist technology theory should be extended to include full-time work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Lábaj, Martin, Tomáš Oleš & Gabriel Procházka (2025): Impact of robots and artificial intelligence on labor and skill demand: evidence from the UK. In: Eurasian business review, Jg. 15, H. 4, S. 953-1001. DOI:10.1007/s40821-025-00314-w

Abstract

"Over the past four decades, automation technologies have replaced routine tasks performed by medium-skilled workers, and contributed to increased labor market polarization. With the advent of artificial intelligence, this dynamic may have shifted, extending task substitution to non-routine tasks performed by high-skilled workers. Using textual analysis and descriptions of technology found in patent texts, we construct novel occupational exposures to robot and artificial intelligence technologies. These occupational exposures are then used to analyze changes in labor and skill demand over the last decade in the United Kingdom. We find that the middle part of the income distribution is primarily exposed to robot technology, while exposure to artificial intelligence increases monotonically across income percentiles. Second, we find that exposure to robots is strongest among high school dropouts and declines monotonically with education, while artificial intelligence automation has a limited impact on the same workers, with a pronounced exposure among college graduates. Third, our findings suggest asymmetric effects of automation technologies across skill groups. Robot automation reduces demand for low-skilled workers, while AI technology shifts demand away from high-skilled workers, with the direct effects consistently negative despite the presence of several compensating mechanisms. Fourth, despite significant effects on wage bill, we find no robust relationship between automation exposure and changes in the employment-to-population ratio. Finally, a joint estimation of the effects of robot and AI automation shows that robot automation is positively associated with an increase in demand for skilled workers, while AI automation is weakly associated with a decrease in demand for skilled workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Lühr, Thomas & Tobias Kämpf (2025): Bots im Büro. Künstliche Intelligenz und der Wandel von Angestelltenarbeit in der digitalen Transformation. (Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Study 494), Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, 98 S.

Abstract

"Mit der digitalen Transformation kommt es zu einem Schub in der Automatisierung von Arbeit. Die Einführung von Künstlicher Intelligenz führt zur grundlegenden Restrukturierung der Arbeitsinhalte und -prozesse im Büro. Damit gehen nicht nur Risiken von Funktionsverlusten bis hin zum Verlust des Arbeitsplatzes einher, sondern auch neue Machtpotenziale. Diese prägen das Bewusstsein der Angestellten wesentlich. Künstliche Intelligenz funktioniert nicht ohne Mitbestimmung - mit Mitbestimmung ergeben sich neue Ansatzpunkte für eine arbeitspolitische Vorwärtsstrategie. Die vorliegende Studie nimmt eine empirisch gestützte Analyse der Potenziale vor, die der Automatisierungsschub für die Beschäftigten und ihre Interessenvertretungen tatsächlich bietet." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Machovec, Christine, Michael Rieley & Emily Rolen (2025): Incorporating AI impacts in BLS employment projections: occupational case studies. In: Monthly labor review H. February. DOI:10.21916/mlr.2025.1

Abstract

"In the last few years, artificial intelligence (AI) has advanced rapidly, finding growing applications across industries and occupations. This development has generated interest in how the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics assesses and incorporates AI’s potential labor market impacts in its employment projections. In this article, we explain the Bureau’s approach to this type of projections work, illustrating it with several occupational case studies based on research done for the 2023–33 projections cycle. The case studies focus on selected occupations in the computer, legal, business and financial, and architecture and engineering occupational groups." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Mak, Eric & Aloysius Siow (2025): Occupational Choice, Matching, and Earnings Inequality. In: Journal of Political Economy, Jg. 133, H. 1, S. 355-383. DOI:10.1086/732530

Abstract

"We combine classic occupational choice (Roy, 1951) and frictionless matching (Sattinger, 1979) to explain earnings by occupation and firm in a way that is consistent with the double assignment. In our model, within-firm inequality is globally non-zero whenever there is asymmetry in the revenue function or the occupational skill distribution across occupations. Occupational earnings overlap each other, and unlike the Roy Model, the distributions of potential earnings are endogenous. In line with recent empirical findings on earning decomposition, skill-biased technical change (SBTC)increases within-firm inequality mostly among high-wage firms and not among low-wagefirms." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Malin, Christine, Jürgen Fleiß, Renate Ortlieb & Stefan Thalmann (2025): Rejected by an AI? Comparing job applicants’ fairness perceptions of artificial intelligence and humans in personnel selection. In: Frontiers in artificial intelligence, Jg. 8. DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1671997

Abstract

"Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) transforms personnel selection, but the application of AI raises fairness concerns and aversion towards AI. Although job applicants may perceive the selection process as fairer when they receive an explanation for the decision, scientific knowledge about AI-related fairness perceptions in this setting is limited. This paper investigates how job applicants perceive fairness of an AI-based personnel selection process considering explanations provided. Methods: The hypotheses are based on a theoretical framework about fairness and literature on algorithm aversion. Data were collected through a vignette-style method focusing on four personnel selection scenarios (n = 921). Results: We show that provided explanations increase job applicants ’ perceptions of outcome fairness, process fairness, interpersonal treatment, and recommendation intention, irrespective of the decision being made by an AI or human. Discussion: We provide conclusions for algorithmic decision-making and discuss factors that need to be considered when adopting and designing AI so that AI is perceived as fair." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Marczuk, Anna, Frank Multrus, Thomas Hinz & Susanne Strauss (2025): Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) im Studienalltag: Einschätzungen von Studierenden zum Einsatz von KI an deutschen Hochschulen. (DZHW-Brief 2025,02), Hannover, 15 S. DOI:10.34878/2025.02.dzhw_brief

Abstract

"Die Mehrheit der Studierenden nutzt im Wintersemester 2024/2025 KI im Studium und kennt deren Funktionsweise relativ gut. ChatGPT ist das meistgenutzte KI-Tool, dessen Nutzung seit 2023 deutlich angestiegen ist. Studierende verwenden KI am häufigsten für die Einführung in ein Thema und für Textverarbeitungen, deutlich seltener für Literaturrecherchen oder Datenanalysen. Die Mehrheit der Studierenden gibt an, dass KI die Erledigung von Aufgaben, die keinen Spaß machen oder schwierig sind, beschleunigt oder erleichtert. Seltener sind Studierende der Ansicht, dass KI die Studienleistungen verbessert. Studierende stehen KI auch kritisch gegenüber, insbesondere wegen ihrer Fehleranfälligkeit und des Risikos, von ihr abhängig zu werden. Studierende, die KI häufig nutzen, sind gegenüber KI ähnlich kritisch wie Studierende, die sie seltener nutzen. Der Einsatz von Learning Analytics wird von Studierenden eher befürwortet, wenn sie selbst dadurch unterstützt werden (etwa durch Kurs- und Literaturempfehlungen), weniger zur Unterstützung von Lehrenden (etwa bei der Benotung) oder der Hochschulverwaltung (etwa für die Studienabbruchprävention). Studierende erleben eher selten eine Unterstützung der Hochschulen bei der Nutzung von KI im Studium. An einigen Hochschulen berichten sie von Richtlinien zur Nutzung, seltener sind Schulungsangebote oder eine Integration in die Lehre. Studierende wünschen sich KI-Unterstützung beim Verfassen von Hausarbeiten, während der Einsatz durch Lehrende zur Benotung oder als Ersatz für Lerngruppen (automatisierte Lernbuddys) skeptisch gesehen wird. Eine Teildigitalisierung von Lehrveranstaltungen (Mischung aus Präsenz und online) ist für Studierende attraktiver als reine Präsenz- oder gar reine Onlineveranstaltungen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Matthes, Britta (2025): Der Einsatz Künstlicher Intelligenz allein kann die zukünftigen Fachkräfteengpässe nicht beheben. (GVG-Perspektive 19), 3 S.

Abstract

"In diesem Beitrag beleuchtet Dr. Britta Matthes, Leiterin der Forschungsgruppe „Berufe in der Transformation“ am IAB, weshalb trotz der Potenziale von Künstlicher Intelligenz Investitionen in die Weiterqualifizierung älterer Beschäftigter unabdingbar bleiben." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Matthes, Britta (2025): KI und Beratung. In: Dvb-Forum, Jg. 64, H. 1, S. 17-22., 2025-02-14.

Abstract

"Wie KI und andere digitale Technologien den Arbeitsmarkt verändern: Am IAB werden wir immer wieder danach gefragt, welche Berufe angesichts der rasanten technologischen Entwicklungen der letzten Jahre überhaupt noch Zukunft haben. Bislang hat man zur Beantwortung dieser Frage Prognosen zu Rate gezogen. Hier wurde anfangs – unter Berücksichtigung verschiedener relativ stabiler Faktoren wie dem Erwerbspersonenpotenzial, der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung oder der zu erwartenden Migration – hochgerechnet, wie sich die Zahl der Berufsanfänger auf die verschiedenen Berufe und Qualifikationsniveaus verteilt, wenn die Entwicklung sich wie in der Vergangenheit fortsetzen würde. Schon früh wurde jedoch deutlich, dass diese Faktoren weniger stabil sind als ursprünglich angenommen. Um diese Dynamik zu berücksichtigen, wurde dieser Ansatz erweitert, indem nunmehr Projektionen erstellt werden. Dazu werden Annahmen über die Folgen bestimmter, äußerst wahrscheinlicher Ereignisse oder Verhaltensweisen getroffen, für die sich (noch) keine langfristige Zahlenbasis finden lässt. So gibt die QuBe-Projektion einen langfristigen Überblick über die voraussichtliche Entwicklung des Arbeitskräftebedarfs und -angebotes nach Qualifikationen und Berufen unter einer Reihe von Annahmen über zum Beispiel die Folgen des Klimawandels oder den Ausbau der ökologischen Landwirtschaft. Außerdem werden anhand von Abweichungen zwischen diesem Basismodell und Szenarien die absehbaren Folgen bestimmter Vorhaben oder Ereignisse, wie zum Beispiel der Maßnahmen zur Energie- und -Mobilitätswende abgeschätzt (https://www.bibb.de/de/202333.php). Allerdings sind diese Modelle sehr komplex und es stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit solche Projektionen für die Bildungs- und Berufsberatung einzelner Personen sinnvoll genutzt werden können. Hinzu kommt derzeit, dass die technologische Entwicklung derart schnell voranschreitet, dass verstärkt mit Umwälzungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt gerechnet werden muss, die auch altbekannte Zusammenhänge in Frage stellen könnten. Für die einzelne Person steht die Frage im Raum, mit welchen Konsequenzen sie selbst rechnen muss, wenn neue Technologien zum Einsatz kommen: Reicht es aus, sich auf den aktuellen Wissensstand im eigenen Beruf zu bringen? Womit sollte man sich konkret beschäftigen, um den Anforderungen des Berufes weiterhin gewachsen zu sein? Ist es zielführender, sich beruflich neu zu orientieren?" (Textauszug, IAB-Doku, © wbv)

Zitatform

Matthes, Britta (2025): Wie KI Berufe verändert und Chancen für Menschen mit Behinderungen schafft. In: Die Berufliche Rehabilitation, Jg. 39, H. 1, S. 6-15., 2025-04-04.

Abstract

"Es ist absehbar, dass die rasanten technologischen Entwicklungen der letzten Jahre, insbesondere die enorme Steigerung der Rechenleistung und die Entwicklung selbstlernender algorithmischer Systeme, die heute allgemein als Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) bezeichnet werden, ihre Spuren auf dem Arbeitsmarkt hinterlassen werden. Welche das genau sein werden, können wir leider aber auch nicht sagen. Denn gerade in solch disruptiven Zeiten, wie wir sie derzeit erleben, wissen wir nicht, wie schnell und in welche Richtung sich bestehende Berufe verändern, welche Berufe verschwinden und welche neu entstehen werden. Zwar können Prognosen etwas darüber sagen, wie sich die Zahl der Berufseinsteiger*innen auf die verschiedenen Berufe und Qualifikationsniveaus verteilen würde, wenn sich die Entwicklung wie in der Vergangenheit fortsetzt. Allerdings scheinen die Potenziale, die sich aus dem Einsatz von KI ergeben, bekannte Zusammenhänge in Frage zu stellen. Hinzu kommt, dass diese Prognosemodelle sehr komplex sind, um daraus sinnvolle Schlussfolgerungen für den Einzelnen zu ziehen. So lässt sich die Frage, inwiefern KI und andere digtale Technolgien auch die Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten für Menschen mit Behinderungen erweitern könnten, damit kaum beantworten." (Textauszug, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Matysiak, Anna, Wojciech Hardy & Lucas van der Velde (2025): Structural Labour Market Change and Gender Inequality in Earnings. In: Work, Employment and Society, Jg. 39, H. 2, S. 426-448. DOI:10.1177/09500170241258953

Abstract

"Research from the US argues that women will benefit from a structural labor market change as the importance of social tasks increases and that of manual tasks declines. This article contributes to this discussion in three ways: (a) by extending the standard framework of task content of occupations in order to account for the gender perspective; (b) by developing measures of occupational task content tailored to the European context; and (c) by testing this argument in 13 European countries. Data are analyzed from the European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations database and the European Structure of Earnings Survey. The analysis demonstrates that relative to men the structural labor market change improves the earnings potential of women working in low- and middle-skilled occupations but not those in high-skilled occupations. Women are overrepresented in low-paid social tasks (e.g. care) and are paid less for analytical tasks than men." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

McGuinness, Seamus, Paul Redmond, Konstantinos Pouliakas, Lorcan Kelly & Luke Brosnan (2025): Technological Change and the Upskilling of European Workers. (IZA discussion paper / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 17753), Bonn, 22 S.

Abstract

"Using the second wave of the European Skills and Jobs survey, this paper measures the relationship between technological change that automates or augments workers' job tasks and their participation in work-related training. We find that 58 per cent of European employees experienced no change in the need to learn new technologies in their jobs during the 2020-21 period. Of those exposed to new digital technology, 14 per cent did not experience any change in job tasks, 10 per cent reported that new tasks had been created while 5 per cent only saw some of their tasks being displaced by new technology. The remaining 13 per cent simultaneously experienced both task displacement and task creation. Our analysis shows that employees in jobs impacted by new digital technologies are more likely to have to react to unpredictable situations, thus demonstrating a positive link between technologically driven task disruption and job complexity. We show a strong linear relationship between technologically driven job task disruption and the need for job-related training, with training requirements increasing the greater the impact of new technologies on task content." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Milanez, Anna, Annikka Lemmens & Carla Ruggiu (2025): Algorithmic management in the workplace. New evidence from an OECD employer survey. (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers 31), Paris, 72 S. DOI:10.1787/287c13c4-en

Abstract

"Algorithmisches Management – der Einsatz von Software, die auch künstliche Intelligenz (KI) umfassen kann, zur vollständigen oder teilweisen Automatisierung von Tätigkeiten, die bislang von menschlichen Führungskräften ausgeführt wurden – hat in den letzten Jahren zunehmend Beachtung gefunden. Einerseits kann algorithmisches Management innerhalb von Unternehmen zu Produktivitäts- und Effizienzgewinnen sowie zu konsistenteren und objektiveren Managemententscheidungen führen. Andererseits gibt es aus anderen Studien immer mehr Anzeichen für seine potenziell negativen Auswirkungen auf die Beschäftigten. Während Politikverantwortliche mit der Frage ringen, wie den Herausforderungen des algorithmischen Managements begegnet werden könnte, bedarf es weiterer Evidenz. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, stützt sich der vorliegende Bericht auf eine einzigartige Erhebung unter mehr als 6 000 Unternehmen in sechs Ländern: Deutschland, Frankreich, Italien, Japan, Spanien und die Vereinigten Staaten. Er bietet beispiellose Einblicke in die Prävalenz des algorithmischen Managements, seine wahrgenommenen Auswirkungen und die auf Unternehmensebene ergriffenen Maßnahmen zur Steuerung seines Einsatzes. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass algorithmische Management-Systeme in der Mehrzahl der untersuchten Länder bereits weit verbreitet sind. In der Wahrnehmung von Führungskräften verbessert algorithmisches Management zwar häufig die Qualität der Entscheidungen und die Zufriedenheit mit der eigenen beruflichen Situation, die Vertrauenswürdigkeit solcher Systeme gibt ihnen jedoch auch Anlass zur Sorge. Als Gründe dafür nennen sie die unklare Verantwortlichkeit, die nicht leicht nachzuvollziehende Logik der Systeme und den unzureichenden Gesundheitsschutz der Beschäftigten. Es ist dringend erforderlich, Politiklücken zu untersuchen, um den vertrauenswürdigen Einsatz algorithmischer Management-Systeme sicherzustellen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Minniti, Antonio, Klaus Prettner & Francesco Venturini (2025): AI innovation and the labor share in European regions. In: European Economic Review, Jg. 177. DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105043

Abstract

"This paper examines how the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) affects the distribution of income between capital and labor, and how these shifts contribute to regional income inequality. To investigate this issue, we analyze data from European regions dating back to 2000. We find that for every doubling of regional AI innovation, the labor share declines by 0.5% to 1.6%, potentially reducing it by 0.09 to 0.31 percentage points from an average of 52%, solely due to AI. This new technology has a particularly negative impact on high- and medium-skill workers, primarily through wage compression, while for low-skill workers, employment expansion induced by AI mildly offsets the associated wage decline. The effect of AI is not driven by other factors influencing regional development in Europe or by the concentration of the AI market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))

Zitatform

Molitor, Friederike (2025): Work arrangements in digitally mediated care and domestic work. In: Community, work & family, S. 1-20. DOI:10.1080/13668803.2025.2523863

Abstract

"As the need for care has grown, paid care and domestic work in the private home is increasingly being organized on the market. Today, digital platforms serve as intermediaries for care and domestic services but systematic research on the resulting work arrangements between workers and clients remains limited. By understanding platform-mediated care and domestic work arrangements as a (social) exchange of ‘love and money’ between workers and clients, the study explores the working conditions and the worker-client relationships that emerge. Drawing on unique survey data collected on a large digital platform in Germany in 2019, the study shows that care and domestic workers who offer their services on digital platforms often experience informal work arrangements characterized by low working hours and irregular shifts. The worker-client relationships are described as amicable more than professional. They are often built on continuity, long-termism and reliability, which are essential for a lasting relationship. This challenges the on-demand, economic logic characterising other forms of platform work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Muehlemann, Samuel (2025): Artificial intelligence adoption and workplace training. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jg. 238. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107206

Abstract

"As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes business processes, firms must adapt their training strategies to cultivate a skilled workforce. Using German establishment-level panel data from 2019 to 2023, this study analyzes how firms adjust their training strategies following AI adoption. Staggered difference-in-differences analysis shows that sustained AI adoption is associated with a 14% increase in new apprenticeships among training firms (intensive margin), but is not linked to the training decision (extensive margin). AI adoption is also associated with a modest increase in continuing training, with resources shifting toward high-skilled employees. The results align with AI as an automation innovation that reduces demand for simple skills as well as an augmentation innovation that increases demand for more advanced skills. The German dual apprenticeship system appears critical for firms aiming to build a future-ready workforce in the age of AI." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))

Zitatform

Müller, Steffen & Verena Plümpe (2025): Wie Roboter die betriebliche Beschäftigungsstruktur verändern. In: Wirtschaft im Wandel, Jg. 31, H. 1, S. 10-13. DOI:10.18717/wwfyns-ep75

Abstract

"Der Einsatz von Robotern verändert die Arbeitswelt grundlegend – doch welche spezifischen Effekte hat dies auf die Beschäftigungsstruktur? Unsere Analyse untersucht die Folgen des Robotereinsatzes anhand neuartiger Mikrodaten aus deutschen Industriebetrieben. Diese Daten verknüpfen Informationen zum Robotereinsatz mit Sozialversicherungsdaten und detaillierten Angaben zu Arbeitsaufgaben. Auf Basis eines theoretischen Modells leiten wir insbesondere positive Beschäftigungseffekte für Berufe mit wenig repetitiven, programmierbaren Aufgaben ab, sowie für jüngere Arbeitskräfte, weil diese sich besser an technologische Veränderungen anpassen können. Die empirische, mikroökonomische Analyse des Robotereinsatzes auf Betriebsebene bestätigt diese Vorhersagen: Die Beschäftigung steigt für Techniker, Ingenieure und Manager und junge Beschäftigte, während sie bei geringqualifizierten Routineberufen sowie bei Älteren stagniert. Zudem steigt die Fluktuation bei geringqualifizierten Arbeitskräften signifikant an. Unsere Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass der Verdrängungseffekt von Robotern berufsabhängig ist, während junge Arbeitskräfte neue Tätigkeiten übernehmen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Müller, Christoph (2025): Weiterbildungsungleichheit und technologischer Wandel: Nach IT-Investitionen steigt vor allem die Weiterbildungsquote der Höherqualifizierten. (IAB-Kurzbericht 06/2025), Nürnberg, 8 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.KB.2506

Abstract

"Betriebliche Weiterbildung soll dazu beitragen, die Fähigkeiten der Beschäftigten an neue Anforderungen anzupassen. Gerade im Zuge der digitalen Transformation der Arbeitswelt sind solche Anpassungen dringend erforderlich. Die vorliegende Analyse des Zusammenhangs zwischen Investitionen in digitale Technologien und innerbetrieblicher Weiterbildung zeigt: In Betrieben mit IT-Investitionen steigen die Weiterbildungsquoten der Beschäftigten mit qualifizierten Tätigkeiten; bei denjenigen mit einfachen Tätigkeiten ist dies im Mittel hingegen nicht der Fall." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Neumann, Uwe (2025): Digital transformation, employment change and the adaptation of regions in Germany. In: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Jg. 73, S. 37-50. DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.12.014

Abstract

"Digital change is often said to lead to large-scale job losses. Using data from administrative sources in Germany, this study examines the extent to which adaptation to digital change has affected regional employment growth and disparities over the past decade. The analysis confirms previous research according to which increases in productivity coincide with regional job growth rather than decline. Incorporating various indicators of digitalisation and automation into a model of industry-specific regional job growth shows that local labour markets with very different characteristics – regions with strong manufacturing clusters on the one hand and large cities on the other – have achieved employment growth despite high automation exposure. While the study highlights regional differentials with respect to the adaptation to technological change, less prosperous regions may face a much greater challenge in realising job creation potentials. The results argue against policy efforts aimed at “protecting” jobs from digitalisation and automation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))

Zitatform

Neumann, Michael & Anika Kamin (2025): Ordnungspolitische Herausforderungen durch die Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, Jg. 74, H. 2, S. 162-187. DOI:10.1515/zfwp-2025-2007

Abstract

"The digitalisztion of the world of work enables new phenomena such as cloud robotics and deep learning. With the use of artificial intelligence in the workplace, but also due to the massive use of digital communication technologies, our working world is currently being revolutionized. Increased outsourcing, symbiotic collaboration with robots, individualised employment relationships and a rise in teleworking and home office are coming to society. They encounter a legal framework that is not designed for these innovations. The new challenges have a lot to do with the readiness of the population for digital change and thus with specific educational components, furthermore with the expansion of the digital infrastructure, but at least as much with the legal regulations and thus with the regulatory policy in the respective countries. This article aims to highlight these regulatory challenges for Germany." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © De Gruyter) ((en))

Zitatform

Nigar, Meher, Jannatul Ferdous Juli, Uttam Golder, Mohammad Jahangir Alam & Mohammad Kamal Hossain (2025): Artificial intelligence and technological unemployment. Understanding trends, technology's adverse roles, and current mitigation guidelines. In: Journal of open innovation, Jg. 11, H. 3. DOI:10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100607

Abstract

"As artificial intelligence (AI) and automation continue to reshape industries, concerns about technological unemployment are intensifying. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by the PRISMA framework to examine peer-reviewed literature from the Scopus database (2015–July 09, 2025). It identifies threecore themes: (1) trends in AI-induced labor displacement, including task automation, skill polarization, and industry-specific disruptions in sectors such as healthcare, education, and creative industries; (2) the adverse roles of AI technologies, particularly in affecting white-collar professionals, gig workers, and freelancers by increasing precarity and skill mismatches; and (3) existing mitigation strategies, including responsible AI guidelines proposed by governments, institutions, and firms aimed at balancing technological advancement with employment protection. While a growing body of policy responses encourages human-AI complementarity, current measures remain fragmented and insufficient to address the structural risks of workforce displacement. This study presents a comprehensive synthesis of the evolving relationship between AI and employment, highlighting key areas for further inquiry and policy development." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Authors. Published by ElsevierLtd on behalf of Prof JinHyo Joseph Yun.) ((en))

Zitatform

Nikolova, Milena, Anthony Lepinteur & Femke Cnossen (2025): Just another cog in the machine? A worker‐level view of robotization and tasks. In: Economica, Jg. 92, H. 368, S. 1101-1148. DOI:10.1111/ecca.70006

Abstract

"Technological change has led to a decline in the share of routine and physical jobs, and a rise in the share of abstract and social ones at the economy level. However, much less is known about how these trends unfold at the individual level. Do workers' tasks become more or less routine and physical? Do workers shift towards more social and abstract activities? This paper is the first to explore these questions in the context of robotization. We use survey data from 20 European countries to develop worker-level indices of physical, routine, abstract and social tasks, which we link to industry-level robotization exposure. Using instrumental variable techniques, we find that robotization reduces physically demanding tasks but increases routine tasks, while also limiting opportunities for cognitively challenging work and human interaction. This study provides a worker-centric perspective on the relationship between technology and task composition, revealing insights that aggregate analyses miss." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Ohly, Sandra, Amina Granica, Hannes Herwig, Niklas Kühlewind, Tobias Paetzold, Lana Vinhoven, Luisa Wiemers & Xi Zhang (2025): Humane work design: How does the digitization of work change core work characteristics in different occupations? In: Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, Jg. 79, H. 4, S. 569-580. DOI:10.1007/s41449-025-00491-4

Abstract

"Wenn vermehrt digitale Tools eingesetzt werden und Arbeit im Homeoffice stattfindet, verändern sich Arbeitsbedingungen. Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert diese Veränderungen anhand von 8 Fällen und arbeitet Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede heraus. Die Prognose von Lernen, Wohlbefinden und Arbeitsleistung erlaubt es, Fehlentwicklungen in der Arbeitsgestaltungen abzuschätzen.Praktische Relevanz: Durch Aufmerksamkeit auf mögliche Fehlentwicklungen können Gegenmaßnahmen getroffen werden, etwa zur Verbesserung der Kommunikation und sozialen Unterstützung bei ortsverteilter Arbeit, oder der angepassten Gestaltung von KI-Systemen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Okur, Fatih & Enes Özdemir (2025): Artificial intelligence, automation and employment dynamics: empirical evidence from G7 economies. In: Journal of Economic Studies, S. 1-17. DOI:10.1108/jes-06-2025-0414

Abstract

"Purpose: This study examines how the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation affects employment dynamics across G7 economies. While previous research has often focused on either AI or robotics in isolation, their combined and long-term effects on employment remain poorly understood. Addressing this gap is crucial for policymakers seeking to balance technological progress with labor market stability. Design/methodology/approach: Using a balanced panel dataset covering 2010–2024 for the G7 countries, thestudy investigates the relationships between AI investment (proxied by information and communication technology (ICT) investment), robot density (ROBOT), wages, productivity (PRD) and education spending (EDU), and their impact on employment. The analysis employs panel unit root and cross-sectional dependence tests, a panel autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) framework estimated via the pooled mean group (PMG) estimator, and robustness checks using Driscoll–Kraay fixed effects, common correlatedeffects (CCE) estimators, country-specific regressions and Dumitrescu –Hurlin panel causality tests. Findings: The results reveal that AI investment has a significant negative effect on employment in the long run, whereas ROBOT shows a positive but context-dependent relationship. Wage levels are negatively associated with employment, while PRD shows only a modest positive influence. Education expenditure exhibits mixed behavior – positive in the short run but negative in the long run – suggesting potential misalignment with evolving labor market needs. Causality tests confirm a unidirectional link from AI investment to employment, underscoring its structural role in labor market change. Research limitations/implications: This study is limited by data availability, particularly the lack of detailed sectoral or occupational breakdowns across countries. As a result, it cannot fully capture the distributional effects of AI and automation across different worker groups. The use of proxies, such as ICT investment for AI, may not reflect the full scope of AI deployment. Despite these limitations, the findings highlight important macro-level dynamics and suggest that technological investments significantly shape employment trends. Future research should utilize micro-level data to explore sector-specific impacts, wage effects and labor force transitions in response to digital transformation. Practical implications: The findings suggest that without targeted policy interventions, increased AI investment may displace workers in the long run. Policymakers should prioritize reskilling, adapt education systems to evolving technological needs, and differentiate strategies across sectors and worker skill levels. Social implications: This study highlights the potential for AI and automation to reshape labor markets, with implications for income distribution, job security and social cohesion. The displacement of routine jobs may disproportionately affect low-skilled and vulnerable workers, increasing the risk of inequality and social exclusion. To prevent deepening divides, social policies must focus on equitable access to education, digital literacy and lifelong learning. Supporting workforce adaptability through inclusive training programs and social safety nets is essential. The results underscore the urgent need for collaborative efforts between governments, educational institutions and industries to ensure a socially sustainable digital transformation. Originality/value: This study is among the first to jointly analyze AI and robotics within a dynamic panel framework, offering new cross-country evidence on their heterogeneous employment effects in advanced economies. By integrating multiple estimation strategies and country-specific perspectives, the paper contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how technological transformation reshapes labor markets and highlights the institutional conditions that mediate these effects." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © EmeraldGroup) ((en))

Zitatform

Omri, Anis, Henda Omri & Hatem Afi (2025): Exploring the impact of AI on unemployment for people with disabilities: do educational attainment and governance matter? In: Frontiers in Public Health, Jg. 13. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559101

Abstract

"The current study investigates the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on unemployment among people with disabilities, focusing on the mediating role of education and the moderating effect of governance quality. Using panel data from 27 high-tech developed countries between 2006 and 2022, the findings reveal a nuanced relationship where AI initially increases unemployment among people with disabilities due to automation and skill mismatches. However, advanced education mitigates this effect, significantly improving employability by equipping individuals with market-relevant skills. Governance quality plays a critical role in this dynamic, amplifying AI’s positive impact on education while, paradoxically, intensifying its negative effects on unemployment when governance frameworks are weak or misaligned. These findings underscore the importance of robust governance structures and targeted educational initiatives to harness AI’s potential in fostering inclusive labor markets. Policymakers should align AI investments with governance reforms and education systems to ensure equitable employment opportunities for people with disabilities." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Otoiu, Adrian, Emilia Titan, Dorel Paraschiv & Daniela-Ioana Manea (2025): Job polarisation OR AND upgrading! Recent evidence from Europe. In: The Economic and Labour Relations Review, Jg. 36, H. 1, S. 257-270. DOI:10.1017/elr.2025.12

Abstract

"Based on recent evidence from Europe, the paper shows that polarization and upgrading are not mutually exclusive trends, but rather, simultaneously defined recent structural changes in employment. The results show that (a) the occupational structure shows a general shift towards high-skill jobs, (b) the prevailing upgrading patterns are often accompanied by job polarization, as the share of middle-skill jobs declines in most cases, and (c) while low-skill employment often outperforms middle-skill jobs, it has tended to decline. In addition to analysing trends for EU-27 countries with different levels of development for the latest available time periods, the article also shows that occupational upgrading patterns are rather intertwined with job polarisation and are compatible with both the Skill-Biased Technical Change (SBTC) and Routine-Biaszd Technical Change (RBTC) hypotheses. The employment dynamics of low-skill workers are uncertain, as they are not fully compatible with any theoretical model, thus pointing to the need for a finer understanding of changes in occupational structure, and the extent to which both polarization and upgrading are shaping the evolution of the labor force structure under the impact of (ongoing) technological change." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Ottaiano, Mario Michael, Lea Schneidemesser & Florian Butollo (2025): Künstliche Intelligenz und Erfahrungswissen. Zur Formalisierbarkeit und Delokalisierung von Facharbeit. In: Arbeit. Zeitschrift für Arbeitsforschung, Arbeitsgestaltung und Arbeitspolitik, Jg. 34, H. 4, S. 275-298. DOI:10.1515/arbeit-2025-0015

Abstract

"Der Beitrag untersucht aus arbeitssoziologischer Perspektive, wie der Einsatz von KI-Systemen in der prädiktiven Instandhaltung (PdM) die Bedeutung von Erfahrungswissen im Arbeitsprozess verändert und wie sich die Zusammenarbeit zwischen KI-Anwender- und KI-Anbieterunternehmen gestaltet. Die Fallstudie in einem Unternehmen der Papierindustrie zeigt, dass die Grenze der Formalisierbarkeit von Erfahrungswissen in der Instandhaltungsarbeit graduell ausgeweitet werden kann, wobei das domänenspezifische Wissen der Beschäftigten weiterhin eine wichtige Rolle für die Verbesserung der Software und die Interpretation der gewonnenen Daten spielt. Weil die Einführung des KI-Systems auch eine Delokalisierung von Wissen ermöglicht, kommt es zugleich zu einer konfliktträchtigen Verschiebung der Kompetenzen vom Anwenderunternehmen zum Softwareanbieter." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Parent-Thirion, Agnes, Nora Wukovits-Votzi & Jessye Muller (2025): Future-oriented occupations in the EU. Main features, employment conditions, and job strain. 51 S. DOI:10.2767/2953537

Abstract

"The way we work is changing due to developments associated with the digital and green transition as well as demographic change, as a driver of current and future labour shortages. As these transitions impact job content, tasks and processes, they will change how people work, the skills needed to carry out jobs, employment conditions, and, ultimately, dimensions of their job quality. These transition-related changes in occupations are of high relevance for workers, job applicants, and students training to join these occupations, as well as stakeholders, and policy makers, at the sectoral, national, and European levels. While their impacts are separately treated in this analysis, the green and digital transitions can further exacerbate labour shortages given the skill profiles required by related occupations." (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Parfitt, Harry & Ercüment Çelik (2025): Logistics platforms’ ‘new’ mode of appropriation? An analysis of four trends from inside Germany’s Q-commerce sector. In: Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, Jg. 19, H. 2, S. 261-277. DOI:10.13169/workorgalaboglob.19.2.0009

Abstract

"This article investigates the ‘newness’ of platformized logistics labor through an ethnographic study of a Q-Commerce platform – ‘Smart Groceries’ – in Germany. Because conditions at ‘Smart Groceries’ seemed comparatively good, the authors were forced to question the centrality of ‘gigification’ to platform logistics labor. The article draws on participant observation and 16 in-depth interviews with workers and suggests that logistics platforms’ ‘new’ mode of harnessing labor to capital represents an intertwining of four trends: algorithmic management, flexibilization, the ‘explosion’ of the factory and the incorporation of migrant labor. These trends foster alienation, precarity, fragmentation and exploitation, respectively." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Peeters, Maria C. W., Jan Fekke Ybema, Pascale M. Le Blanc & Judith Plomp (2025): Exploring the delicate relation between technological innovations and work quality: A study among civil servants. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Jg. 46, H. 3, S. 851-873. DOI:10.1177/0143831x251347151

Abstract

"This study explores the delicate relation between technological innovations and work quality. It was conducted across various parts of the Dutch central government. The authors assessed how civil servants perceive changes in job demands, job resources and some relevant outcomes following the implementation of new technologies. Data were collected through an online Technology Monitor (TM) which was (at least partly) completed by 332 respondents. Results showed that employees perceived significant increases in various job demands, alongside a modest increase in the job resource autonomy after technology implementation. Additionally, civil servants who experienced more autonomy following new technology implementation reported higher levels of both work engagement and employability. In contrast, perceptions of increased workload were associated with more burnout symptoms. Interestingly, perceived increases in task variation were associated with fewer burnout symptoms, lower job insecurity and higher work engagement. These findings offer valuable insights for managers and HR professionals involved in managing technological transitions, emphasizing the importance of employee-centered strategies to safeguard and enhance the quality of work of civil servants." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Pesole, Annarosa (2025): Algorithmic Management and the Platformisation of Work in Europe: Evidence from Spain and Germany. In: The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Jg. 68, H. 2, S. 367-394. DOI:10.1007/s41027-024-00544-y

Abstract

"This study investigates the impact of digital tools and algorithmic management on work organisation and working conditions, with a focus on the growing platformisation of work. The research focuses on three main aspects: the use of digital devices and platforms, the collection and processing of data by these platforms, and the role of algorithms in managing labour activities. Drawing on data from the AMPWork survey conducted in Spain and Germany, the analysis explores the prevalence and effects of digital monitoring and algorithmic management within traditional and platform work settings. Findings highlight the significant diffusion of digital tools and reveal that over two-thirds of workers use such technologies in their tasks. However, the extent of platformisation varies by occupation, sector, and digital tool usage. The findings reveal that a significant number of workers now rely on digital devices in their daily tasks, with digital monitoring and algorithmic management prevalent across various work environments. The survey highlights higher levels of platformisation among clerks and operators in high-tech industries, knowledge-intensive services, and public administration. Additionally, remote workers or those operating outside traditional employer premises are more likely to experience platformisation. While the use of platforms can lead to more structured and efficient work procedures, it also introduces challenges, such as increased monotony and stress, suggesting a complex relationship between platformisation and job satisfaction. This study underscores the transformative impact of platformisation on the nature of work, calling attention to the need for further research and policy consideration. The findings emphasise the importance of addressing the implications of digital labour platforms and algorithmic management for job quality, economic value, and the evolving landscape of employment in the digital era. Indeed, the study confirms that the integration of algorithmic management and surveillance technologies in the workplace poses significant risks to workers’ privacy, datarights, freedom of association, and overall well-being. These practices can erode working conditions and harm mental and physical health. Addressing these issues requires strict regulation of intrusive surveillance and the development of a comprehensive policy framework for algorithmic management and digital monitoring." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Pialli, Guido (2025): Benign effects of technological change on the labour share: evidence from European regions. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, Jg. 49, H. 4, S. 795-824. DOI:10.1093/cje/beaf021

Abstract

"The labor share across European regions has shown significant variation since the late 1990s. This paper explores the role of technological change in explaining this regional variation. Specifically, this paper proposes and tests the hypothesis that the recent shift in technological change is labor-intensive, driven by a localized, bottom-up process that exploits the skills and learning processes of the workforce. The empirical analysis, using data from 171 European regions over the period 1999–2015, supports the theoretical framework, showing that technological change has a positive and economically significant impact on the labor share." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Pieterson, Willem (2025): Opportunities of AI within PES processes and services. PES Network Report exploring PES experiences, best practices and emerging business value. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, 67 S. DOI:10.2767/84293

Abstract

"Artificial intelligence (AI), as a branch of advanced data analytics, is a rapidly evolving field. The release of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) in 2022 and the many tools and applications using Generative AI (GenAI) highlight new possibilities. Many governments and public sector agencies are interested in how AI can transform their processes and client services – Public Employment Services (PES) are no exception. An Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study in 2022 suggests that most PES are now showing concrete interest in adopting AI: nearly 40% of PES are looking into AI tools or tools using other types of advanced analytics (AA) to support jobseeker profiling, while more than 40% see the potential of AI for job matching or career services, such as identifying skill gaps. (…) This report compiles a more complete overview of existing and planned AI practices across European PES. It analyses their outcomes, the challenges PES face, and the context in which these developments take place." (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Giulia Santangelo (2025): Are Artificial Intelligence (AI) Skills a Reward or a Gamble? Deconstructing the AI Wage Premium in Europe. (IZA discussion paper / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 17607), Bonn, 33 S.

Abstract

"Understanding the labor market impact of new, autonomous digital technologies, particularly generative or other forms of artificial intelligence (AI), is currently at the top of the research and policy agenda. Many initial studies, though not all, have shown that there is a wage premium to AI skills in labor markets. Such evidence tends to draw on data from web-based sources and typically deploys a keyword approach for identifying AI skills. This paper utilizes representative adult workforce data from 29 European countries, the second European skills and jobs survey, to examine wage differentials of the AI developer workforce. The latter is uniquely identified as part of the workforce that writes programs using AI algorithms. The analysis shows that, on average, AI developers enjoy a significant wage premium relative to a comparably educated or skilled workforce, such as programmers who do not yet write code using AI at work. Wage decomposition analysis further illustrates that there is a large unexplained component of such wage differential. Part of AI programmers' larger wage variability can be attributed to a greater performance-based component in their wage schedules and higher job-skill requirements." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Pouliakas, Konstantinos, Giulia Santangelo & Paul Dupire (2025): Are artificial intelligence skills a reward or a gamble? Deconstructing the AI wage premium in Europe. In: Eurasian business review, Jg. 15, H. 4, S. 1091-1128. DOI:10.1007/s40821-025-00302-0

Abstract

"Understanding the labor market impact of new, autonomous digital technologies, particularly generative or other forms of artificial intelligence (AI), is currently at the top of the research and policy agenda. Many initial studies, though not all, have shown that there is a wage premium to mostly technical AI skills in labor markets. Such evidence tends to draw on data from web-based sources and typically fails to provide insight into the mechanisms underlying the AI wage gap. This paper utilizes representative adult workforce data from 29 European countries, the second European skills and jobs survey, to examine wage differentials of the AI programmer workforce. The latter is uniquely identified as part of the workforce that writes computer programs using AI algorithms. The analysis shows that, on average, AI programmers enjoy a significant wage premium relative to a comparably educated or skilled workforce, such as programmers who do not yet write code using AI at work. Wage decomposition analysis further illustrates that there is a large unexplained component of such wage differential. Part of AI programmers’ larger wage variability can however be attributed to higher job-skill requirements, a propensity for remote work and a greater performance-based component in wage schedules. This indicates differences in the job design and performance management of the AI workforce." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Procentese, Fortuna, Flora Gatti & Emiliano Ceglie (2025): Technostress and work-family interface in the face of COVID-19-related remote work: the moderator role of goals setting and prioritization skills. In: Community, work & family, Jg. 28, H. 2, S. 272-290. DOI:10.1080/13668803.2023.2247147

Abstract

"During the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, in Italy, a nationwide lockdown required a massive shift to remote work – that is, from workers’ houses. The risk of conflict between work and family domains increased due to the collapse of both into private houses and may have been further burdened due to no training being issued to help workers adjust to these changes in their work activities, producing higher rates of technostress. This study deepens the impact of technostress creators on the conflicts between work and family domains and the role of workers’ goal setting and prioritization skills as moderators easing these relationships. Data were gathered from 375 remote workers during the Italian nationwide lockdown using an online questionnaire. Results show that higher scores in technostress creators positively associate with both work-to-family and family-to-work conflicts and the former relationship becomes stronger as workers’ planning skills increase. They highlight the need to consider the pitfalls of remote work, as it can also have detrimental effects on workers’ family and relational life, and to find a better balance between work and family domains from a systemic perspective." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Rabensteiner, Thomas & Alexander Guschanski (2025): Occupational Autonomy and Wage Divergence: Evidence From European Survey Data. In: BJIR, Jg. 63, H. 4, S. 696-713. DOI:10.1111/bjir.70003

Abstract

"Wages across occupations in Western Europe have diverged, resulting in increased wage inequality. However, existing theories such as routine-biased technological change (RBTC) or task offshoring fail to explain this trend. We propose a new explanation based on occupational autonomy. Autonomy measures workers' control and influence over their work process based on the tasks required in an occupation. Analysing individual-level data from the EU Survey of Income and Living Conditions, we reveal a rising autonomy wage premium, that is, higher wage growth for occupations with higher autonomy, which accurately predicts the observed occupational wage divergence. We also find that the autonomy premium increases more rapidly in countries and industries with greater employee monitoring and outsourcing, as well as in countries with declining minimum wages. These findings imply that low-autonomy occupations have been disadvantaged by recent socioeconomic trends that have altered power relations in the workplace. Notably, our analysis does not support previous explanations for occupational wage trends based on RBTC or task offshoring." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Rehmer, Sabine, Holger Muehlan, Maren Menzel, Maike Juds, Michael Fellmann, Hitesh Dhiman & Carsten Röcker (2025): Die Hybridisierung von menschlichen und technischen Arbeitsleistungen mit Künstlicher Intelligenz als neuer Leittechnologie: Entwicklungen, Implikationen und Potenziale für menschengerechte Arbeit. In: Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, Jg. 79, H. 4, S. 525-533. DOI:10.1007/s41449-025-00489-y

Abstract

"Der Artikel untersucht die Hybridisierung menschlicher und technischer Arbeitsleistungen im Kontext Künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als neuer Leittechnologie und analysiert ihre Entwicklungen, Implikationen und Potenziale für eine menschengerechte Arbeitsgestaltung. Ausgehend von der Beobachtung, dass KI zunehmend kognitive Tätigkeiten transformiert, wird mit dem Konzept des „Hybrid Man“ ein neues Menschenbild skizziert, das die enge Verschränkung von menschlicher und maschineller Intelligenz beschreibt. Damit einher gehen tiefgreifende Herausforderungen: Die Grenzen zwischen menschlicher und technischer Leistung verschwimmen, Verantwortungsfragen und rechtliche Unsicherheiten entstehen, während zugleich neue Anforderungen an Kompetenzen wie „AI Literacy“ sichtbar werden. Ebenso rücken Fragen nach Transparenz, Erklärbarkeit und Akzeptanz von KI-Systemen in den Vordergrund, die für Vertrauen und nachhaltige Integration entscheidend sind. Neben den Chancen zur Entlastung und Erweiterung menschlicher Fähigkeiten birgt die Hybridisierung Risiken wie Überwachungsdruck, Anpassungsstress und negative psychische Beanspruchungen. Vor diesem Hintergrund schlägt der Artikel mit dem Konzept des eudaimonischen Wohlbefindens („Eudaimonia“) ein normatives Kriterium für die Gestaltung zukünftiger Arbeit vor, das Wachstum, Sinnhaftigkeit, Authentizität und Exzellenz fördert. Ziel ist eine interdisziplinär fundierte, menschengerechte Arbeitswelt, die die Potenziale von KI nutzbar macht, ohne die psychische Gesundheit, Selbstwirksamkeit und Würde der Beschäftigten zu gefährden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)

Zitatform

Ribeiro, Marcos J. & Klaus Prettner (2025): The Skill Premium Across Countries in the Era of Industrial Robots and Generative AI. (Department of Economics working paper / Vienna University of Economics and Business 381), Wien, 29 S.

Abstract

"How do new technologies affect economic growth and the skill premium? To answer this question, we analyze the impact of industrial robots and artificial intelligence (AI) on the wage differential between low-skill and high-skill workers across 52 countries using counterfactual simulations. In so doing, we extend the nested CES production function framework of Bloom et al. (2025) to account for cross-country income heterogeneity. Confirming prior findings, we Show that the use of industrial robots tends to increase wage inequality, while the use of AI tends to reduce it. Our contribution lies in documenting substantial heterogeneity across income groups: the inequality-increasing effect of robots and the inequality-reducing effects of AI are particularly strong in high-income countries, while they are less pronounced among middle- and lower-middle income countries. In addition, we show that both technologies boost economic growth. In terms of policy recommendations, our findings suggest that investments in education and skill-upgrading can simultaneously raise average incomes and mitigate the negative effects of automation on wage inequality." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Riccio, Federico, Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito (2025): European regional employment and exposure to labour-saving technical change: results from a direct text similarity measure. (LEM working paper series / Laboratory of Economics and Management 2025/19), Pisa, 34 S. DOI:10.57838/sssa/02jp-b197

Abstract

"Does labor-saving technological change pose a threat to European employment, and if so, to what extent? This study investigates the degree of employment exposure to labor-saving technological change across NUTS-2 regions in Europe. We construct a cross-walked metric between the SOC and ISCO classification systems to adapt the direct measure of occupational exposure developed by Montobbio et al. (2024) for the US economy and apply it to the European context. This methodology enables us to generate detailed insights into the exposure of European occupations by leveraging the similarity rankings between technological classifications in the USPTO (CPCs) and task descriptions. To evaluate the transmission from occupational exposure to employment outcomes, we utilise data from the European Structure of Earnings Survey (EU-SES), thereby constructing exposure indices at both sectoral and regional levels. Finally, we examine the industrial and geographical diffusion of labor-saving technological change in recent years and provide robust econometric evidence indicating that low-wage regions, as well as deindustrialising areas heavily integrated into global value chains, are disproportionately vulnerable to the threat of substitution." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Richiardi, Matteo Guido, Leonie Westhoff, Caterina Astarita, Ekkehard Ernst, Clare Fenwick, Neysan Khabirpour & Lorenzo Pelizzari (2025): The impact of a decade of digital transformation on employment, wages, and inequality in the EU: a “conveyor belt” hypothesis. In: Socio-economic review, Jg. 23, H. 3, S. 1225-1251. DOI:10.1093/ser/mwaf011

Abstract

"We study the effects of digital transformation in the European Union on individual employment outcomes, wage growth, and income inequality, during the decade 2010–9. Our results allow us to formulate a ‘conveyor-belt’ hypothesis suggesting that employment confers a competitive advantage in navigating the digital transition due to the accumulation of pertinent skills in the workplace. Because digital skills are acquired with the changing demands of the job, their initial endowment matters less for the employed than for the non-employed. Furthermore, the ability of out-of-work individuals with higher digital skills to jump back on the labour market is reduced for those with higher education, suggesting a faster depreciation of their digital skills. A similar effect, although of limited size, is found for earning growth: out-of-work individuals with higher digital skills are not only more likely to find a job, but experience higher earnings growth, compared to their peers with lower digital skills. Our results point to a vulnerability of workers ‘left behind’ from the digital transformation and the labour market. The overall effects on inequality are, however, limited." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Sargent, Kristina & Jue Wang (2025): A one way ticket to gig? In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jg. 239. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107253

Abstract

"We propose a search and matching model to explore the labor market implications of a growing gig economy. The economy has conventional and gig sectors, with workers searching in both. Some workers never consider gig employment, and others do under certain conditions. Workers are allowed to work in both sectors at the same time if they prefer. Workers match with gig positions with probability one, but gig workers face a wage penalty and matching frictions in the conventional sector. As a result, gig work serves as an alternative to unemployment, the gig sector absorbs labor market slack from the conventional sector, but the choice to engage in the gig economy comes at a cost to workers. By comparing the implications of the model under various levels of exposure to the gig economy, we explore the nature of the sector and the opportunities and consequences that come with it. The benchmark model provides insights into the rise of the gig economy, highlighting its impact on workers and the segmentation of the labor markets. While the presence of the gig sector opens up new job opportunities, potential welfare implications from the existence of the gig sector and its frictions are estimated to range from a benefit around 80% to a cost of around 20%, and directly impact up to two-thirds of the workforce relative to a standard search model with no gig sector. The costs mostly apply to workers with middle to lower productivity, and therefore have important distributional implications. Promoting a more inclusive gig economy can enable market systems to address labor market challenges while preserving their innovative and adaptive capabilities. As a case study, the gig economy highlights the balance between market efficiency and social equity, providing valuable perspectives on labor relations, creative destruction, and policy solutions grounded in market economics." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))

Zitatform

Sartori, Laura & Clementine Collett (2025): Sociotechnical imaginaries of social inequality in the design and use of AI recruitment technology. In: European Societies, Jg. 27, H. 3, S. 409-432. DOI:10.1162/euso_a_00035

Abstract

"Through interviewing 12 companies in Italy which either design (vendors) or use (clients) AI recruitment technology systems, we explore how these companies perceive their systems to interact with issues of social inequality and how these perceptions, in practice, carry societal impacts. Three sociotechnical imaginaries (Jasanoff and Kim, 2015) were consistently embedded within these companies’ visions of this intersection: the third eye, the river, and the car bonnet. Through critically analyzing these imaginaries, we find that they exhibit an overriding desire for productivity and talent capture from clients, and a consequential de-prioritization of addressing social inequality and scrutinizing the ways it could be reproduced from both vendors and clients. It demonstrates that the current ‘desired’ futures, shown by the sociotechnical imaginaries which vendors and clients share for AI-tec-tech are really leading us towards an ‘undesirable’ future of hiring which continues to perpetuate social inequality. This study contributes one of the first pieces of empirical work to simultaneously assess the perceptions of AI-rec-tech vendors ’ and clients’ surrounding social inequality, to shed light on the priorities for design and the motivations for usage, and to reflect upon how this impacts society. This is a significant and original contribution to the evolving body of literature on AI-rec-tech in sociology, critical data studies, and communications." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Zitatform

Schaal, Jacob (2025): A theory-based AI automation exposure index: Applying Moravec's Paradox to the US labor market. (arXiv papers), 33 S. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2510.13369

Abstract

"This paper develops a theory-driven automation exposure index based on Moravec's Paradox. Scoring 19,000 O*NET tasks on performance variance, tacit knowledge, data abundance, and algorithmic gaps reveals that management, STEM, and sciences occupations show the highest exposure. In contrast, maintenance, agriculture, and construction show the lowest. The positive relationship between wages and exposure challenges the notion of skill-biased technological change if AI substitutes for workers. At the same time, tacit knowledge exhibits a positive relationship with wages consistent with seniority-biased technological change. This index identifies fundamental automatability rather than current capabilities, while also validating the AI annotation method pioneered by Eloundou et al. (2024) with a correlation of 0.72. The non-positive relationship with pre-LLM indices suggests a paradigm shift in automation patterns." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))