Gender und Arbeitsmarkt
Das Themendossier "Gender und Arbeitsmarkt" bietet wissenschaftliche und politiknahe Veröffentlichungen zu den Themen Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen und Männern, Müttern und Vätern, Berufsrückkehrenden, Betreuung/Pflege und Arbeitsteilung in der Familie, Work-Life-Management, Determinanten der Erwerbsbeteiligung, geschlechtsspezifische Lohnunterschiede, familien- und steuerpolitische Regelungen sowie Arbeitsmarktpolitik für Frauen und Männer.
Mit dem Filter „Autorenschaft“ können Sie auf IAB-(Mit-)Autorenschaft eingrenzen.
- Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen
- Erwerbsbeteiligung von Männern
- Kinderbetreuung und Pflege
- Berufliche Geschlechtersegregation
- Berufsrückkehr – Wiedereinstieg in den Arbeitsmarkt
- Dual-Career-Couples
- Work-Life
- Geschlechtsspezifische Lohnunterschiede
- Familienpolitische Rahmenbedingungen
- Aktive/aktivierende Arbeitsmarktpolitik
- Arbeitslosigkeit und passive Arbeitsmarktpolitik
- geografischer Bezug
-
Literaturhinweis
Geschlechtergerecht gestalten: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Arbeitsmarkt- und Sozialpolitik (2026)
Bothfeld, Silke ; Jeanrenaud, Yves ; Wöhl, Stefanie; Leitner, Andrea; Schmidt, Dorothea ; Fuchs, Gesine ; Pfarr, Heide; Ahrens, Petra ; Scheele-Bär, Alexandra; Blome, Agnes ; Althaber, Agnieszka ; Jochmann-Döll, Andrea; Gather, Claudia; Winter, Regine; Bächmann, Ann-Christin ; Ohlert, Clemens ; Kotte, Volker; Betzelt, Sigrid; Yollu-Tok, Aysel ; Völkle, Hanna; Kohaut, Susanne; Jurczyk, Karin; Collischon, Matthias ; Holst, Elke; Klenner, Christina; Beblo, Miriam; Nickel, Hildegard Maria; Markowsky, Eva ; Boll, Christina ; Dausch, Lily; Biermann, Ingrid; Knorr, Sandra; Schels, Brigitte ; Gottschall, Karin ; Möller, Iris ; Schütt, Petra; Maier, Friederike; Hohendanner, Christian ; Schürmann, Lena ; Bothfeld, Silke ; Abendroth, Anja-Kristin ; Zimmermann, Florian ; Wanger, Susanne ; Fuchs, Michaela ; Yollu-Tok, Aysel ; Hohendanner, Christian ; Schütt, Petra;Zitatform
Bothfeld, Silke, Yves Jeanrenaud, Stefanie Wöhl, Andrea Leitner, Dorothea Schmidt, Gesine Fuchs, Heide Pfarr, Petra Ahrens, Alexandra Scheele-Bär, Agnes Blome, Agnieszka Althaber, Andrea Jochmann-Döll, Claudia Gather, Regine Winter, Ann-Christin Bächmann, Clemens Ohlert, Volker Kotte, Sigrid Betzelt, Aysel Yollu-Tok, Hanna Völkle, Susanne Kohaut, Karin Jurczyk, Matthias Collischon, Elke Holst, Christina Klenner, Miriam Beblo, Hildegard Maria Nickel, Eva Markowsky, Christina Boll, Lily Dausch, Ingrid Biermann, Sandra Knorr, Brigitte Schels, Karin Gottschall, Iris Möller, Petra Schütt, Friederike Maier, Christian Hohendanner, Lena Schürmann, Silke Bothfeld, Anja-Kristin Abendroth, Florian Zimmermann, Susanne Wanger & Michaela Fuchs (2026): Geschlechtergerecht gestalten. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Arbeitsmarkt- und Sozialpolitik. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 471 S. DOI:10.12907/978-3-593-45932-5
Abstract
"Trotz zahlreicher Bemühungen und Erfolge in der Gleichstellungspolitik seit Ende der 1990er Jahre bestehen in der Praxis nach wie vor erhebliche geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Frauen haben nach wie vor geringere Erfolgsaussichten beim Zugang und beim Verbleib in Beschäftigung, ihre Bezahlung und ihre Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten sind schlechter. Die Beiträge dieses Bandes bieten einen umfassenden Überblick über die aktuelle geschlechtsbezogene Arbeits(marktpolitik-)forschung. Mit einem multiperspektivischen Blick auf den vergeschlechtlichten Arbeitsmarkt gelingt es dem Band, historische Aspekte, Gegenwartsanalysen sowie gesellschaftliche Transformationsprozesse und Lösungsansätze zu verbinden." (Verlagsangaben, IAB-Doku)
Beteiligte aus dem IAB
Bächmann, Ann-Christin ; Kotte, Volker; Kohaut, Susanne; Collischon, Matthias ; Möller, Iris ; Hohendanner, Christian ; Zimmermann, Florian ; Wanger, Susanne ; Fuchs, Michaela ; Hohendanner, Christian ; -
Literaturhinweis
Die Qual der Wahl? Soziale Strukturierungen der tariflichen Wahlmöglichkeit zwischen Zeit und Geld (2025)
Zitatform
Abendroth-Sohl, Anja, Ann-Christin Bächmann, Alexandra Mellies & Kevin Ruf (2025): Die Qual der Wahl? Soziale Strukturierungen der tariflichen Wahlmöglichkeit zwischen Zeit und Geld. In: WSI-Mitteilungen, Jg. 78, H. 1, S. 22-29., 2025-11-01. DOI:10.5771/0342-300X-2025-1-22
Abstract
"Immer mehr Beschäftigte sehen sich mit Vereinbarkeitskonflikten zwischen Privatem und Beruflichem konfrontiert. Entsprechend hat der Wunsch nach mehr Mitbestimmung in der Gestaltung der individuellen Arbeitszeit gesellschaftlich stark an Bedeutung gewonnen. Vor diesem Hintergrund haben einige Gewerkschaften eine tarifliche Wahloption durchgesetzt, die es Beschäftigten erlaubt, sich jährlich zwischen mehr Zeit oder mehr Geld zu entscheiden. Dieser Beitrag untersucht, inwieweit die Wahl von mehr Zeit anstelle von mehr Geld sozial strukturiert ist; er berücksichtigt dabei Unterschiede bei der Wahl von Zeit sowie die dahinterliegenden Motive zwischen Männern und Frauen mit und ohne Kinder unter 14 Jahren im Haushalt." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku, © Nomos)
Weiterführende Informationen
Hier finden Sie den kostenlosen Online-Zugang -
Literaturhinweis
Gender Divergence in Sectors of Work (2025)
Zitatform
Alon, Titan, Sena Coskun & Jane Olmstead‑Rumsey (2025): Gender Divergence in Sectors of Work. (IAB-Discussion Paper 11/2025), Nürnberg, 44 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.DP.2511
Abstract
"Im letzten halben Jahrhundert kam es in vielen Bereichen des Arbeitsmarktes, darunter Arbeitszeit, Einkommen und Berufe, zu einer weitgehenden Annäherung der Geschlechter. Diese Studie zeigt jedoch, dass sich die Beschäftigungssektoren von Männern und Frauen im gleichen Zeitraum tatsächlich auseinanderentwickelt haben. Wir zerlegen den Anstieg der sektoralen Segregation in drei Faktoren: veränderte Präferenzen, Diskriminierung und Technologien. Veränderte Beschäftigungspräferenzen verheirateter Frauen sind der wichtigste Faktor und erklären 59% des Anstiegs der Segregation. Diese veränderten Präferenzen verringern auch die geschlechtsspezifische Einkommenslücke, da die von Frauen geschätzten nicht‑lohnbezogenen Annehmlichkeiten in höher bezahlten Sektoren zunehmend an Bedeutung gewinnen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Skill requirements versus workplace characteristics: exploring the drivers of occupational gender segregation (2025)
Zitatform
Bajka, Scherwin M., Benita Combet, Patrick Emmenegger & Sabine Seufert (2025): Skill requirements versus workplace characteristics: exploring the drivers of occupational gender segregation. In: Socio-economic review, S. 1-22. DOI:10.1093/ser/mwaf034
Abstract
"What role do skill requirements play in gendered occupational preferences? Previous research has emphasized workplace characteristics such as salaries and family-friendly work hours. Less attention has been paid to skill requirements, even though they are an important part of job descriptions and serve as reference points for individuals’ assessment of their suitability for occupations. Using a choice experiment among Swiss adolescents who are in the process of choosing their vocational training occupation, this article demonstrates that women and men have surprisingly similar preferences for workplace characteristics. In contrast, skill requirements are better predictors of gender differences in occupational preferences. We find that technical skills are critical in explaining gendered occupational preferences, with occupations that rely more heavily on new technologies attracting fewer women. At the same time, both genders prefer occupations that emphasize social interactions, suggesting that the prominent ‘people’ versus ‘things’ distinction does not adequately capture gendered occupational preferences." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Do Words Matter? The Impact of Communal and Agentic Language on Women’s Application to Job Opportunities (2025)
Zitatform
Batz-Barbarich, Cassondra, Nicole Strah & Farhan Masud Ahmed (2025): Do Words Matter? The Impact of Communal and Agentic Language on Women’s Application to Job Opportunities. In: Journal of Personnel Psychology, Jg. 24, H. 3, S. 135-147. DOI:10.1027/1866-5888/a000364
Abstract
": Communal and agentic goal affordances predict women’s perceived fit in and pursuit of work environments. However, an organization’s ability to influence women’s perceptions and pursuit of roles via language signals in job advertisements is unclear. This field study examines the impact of communal (vs. agentic) language in job advertisements ( N = 330 ads; 242 organizations) on attitudes and behaviors of actual job seekers. Results indicate that some agentic and communal cues influence behavior such that the former leads to a smaller proportion of female applicants, whereas the latter leads to a greater proportion. However, results became nonsignificant after controlling for industry gender representation. Our results explore the utility of experimentally explored interventions to determine their influence on real applicants’ behaviors." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 Hogrefe Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Inequality in the Labor Market: Continuing Progress? (2025)
Zitatform
Blau, Francine D. (2025): Gender Inequality in the Labor Market: Continuing Progress? In: ILR review, Jg. 78, H. 2, S. 275-303. DOI:10.1177/00197939241308844
Abstract
"This article examines the trends in women ’s economic outcomes in the United States, focusing primarily on labor force participation, occupational attainment, and the gender wage gap. Considerable progress was made on all dimensions prior to the 1990s followed by a slowing or stalling of gains thereafter, with a plateauing of female labor force participation trends and a slowing of women’s occupational and wage convergence with men. The author considers the likelihood that progress in narrowing gender gaps will resume in these areas, and concludes it is unlikely without policy intervention. She then considers new policy initiatives to address work–family issues and labor market discrimination that may help to increase female labor force participation and narrow gender inequities in the labor market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Can gender and race dynamics in performance appraisals be disrupted? The case of social influence (2025)
Zitatform
Bohnet, Iris, Oliver P. Hauser & Ariella S. Kristal (2025): Can gender and race dynamics in performance appraisals be disrupted? The case of social influence. In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Jg. 235. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107032
Abstract
"We document gender and race dynamics in performance evaluations in a multi-national company, examining the impacts of a feature of the performance appraisal process: managers’ knowledge of employees’ self-evaluations. Generally, (White) women were rated higher than men and people of color were rated lower than White employees. Women of color gave themselves the lowest self-ratings. When self-evaluations were unavailable due to a quasi-exogenous shock, manager and self-ratings were less correlated. However, gender and race gaps remained unchanged as managers anchored on previous years’ ratings. Based onsuggestive evidence, women of color without an employment history benefitted from their self-ratings not being shared." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender convergence in all areas: Is it a myth? (2025)
Coskun Dalgic, Sena;Zitatform
Coskun Dalgic, Sena (2025): Gender convergence in all areas: Is it a myth? In: IAB-Forum H. 29.08.2025, 2025-08-27. DOI:10.48720/IAB.FOO.20250829.02
Abstract
"While men and women are increasingly found in the same occupations, a surprising trend has emerged: Sectors are becoming more gender-segregated over time. Are these patterns shaped by discriminatory hiring practices or by individual preferences? Examining this question offers new insights into the complex dynamics behind gendered labour market outcomes." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Beteiligte aus dem IAB
Coskun Dalgic, Sena; -
Literaturhinweis
Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain (2025)
Zitatform
García‐Mainar, Inmaculada, Pablo García‐Ruiz & Victor M. Montuenga (2025): Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain. In: Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain, Jg. 32, H. 5, S. 1982-1993. DOI:10.1111/gwao.13262
Abstract
"The devaluation theory, that is, that occupations where women predominate become less socially valued than those where men are in the majority, has not reached a unanimous conclusion in the empirical literature, especially when prestige is used as an indicator of the valuation of the occupation. The changing economic and social circumstances may influence the fulfillment of this hypothesis over time. Using regression analysis, this article tests the adequacy of the devaluation theory in the Spanish labor market at two points in time, 1991 and 2013. Previously, it also describes and analyzes whether the ordering of occupations has changed substantially in this period, using two different comparable scales. The results confirm a weakening in the support of the devaluation theory such that gender segregation of occupations does not necessarily imply differences in their social valuation. This result can be attributed to (i) the increase of prestige in some feminized occupations and (ii) the increase of women's participation in prestigious occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Global Gender Distortions Index (GGDI) (2025)
Goldberg, Pinelopi; Gottlieb, Charles ; Lall, Somik V.; Lakshmi Ratan, Aishwarya; Peters, Michael ; Mehta, Meet;Zitatform
Goldberg, Pinelopi, Charles Gottlieb, Somik V. Lall, Meet Mehta, Michael Peters & Aishwarya Lakshmi Ratan (2025): The Global Gender Distortions Index (GGDI). (CEPR discussion paper / Centre for Economic Policy Research 20554), London, 58 S.
Abstract
"The extent to which women participate in the labor market varies greatly across the globe. If such differences reflect distortions that women face in accessing good jobs, they can reduce economic activity through a misallocation of talent. In this paper, we build on Hsieh et al. (2019) to provide a methodology to quantify these productivity consequences. The index we propose, the ”Global Gender Distortions Index (GGDI)”, measures the losses in aggregate productivity that gender-based misallocation imposes. Our index allows us to separately identify labor demand distortions (e.g., discrimination in hiring for formal jobs) from labor supply distortions (e.g., frictions that discourage women’s labor force participation) and can be computed using data on labor income and job types. Our methodology also highlights an important distinction between welfare-relevant misallocation and the consequences on aggregate GDP if misallocation arises between market work and non-market activities. To showcase the versatility of our index, we analyze gender misallocation within countries over time, across countries over the development spectrum, and across local labor markets within countries. We find that misallocation is substantial and that demand distortions account for most of the productivity losses." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender and unemployment: a vignette experiment on recruiters’ hiring intentions in sex-segregated occupations (2025)
Zitatform
Gutfleisch, Tamara & Robin Samuel (2025): Gender and unemployment: a vignette experiment on recruiters’ hiring intentions in sex-segregated occupations. In: European Societies, S. 1-35. DOI:10.1162/euso_a_00040
Abstract
"This study investigates the interplay between occupational sex composition and gender-specific unemployment patterns from the perspective of demand-side mechanisms, an area where existing research is scant. Experimental evidence suggests that unemployment is often perceived more negatively for men than women in hiring decisions. However, it is unclear how the disadvantages from unemployment and those associated with applying for gender-atypical jobs combine to (re-)produce gender inequality in re-employment chances. Utilizing secondary data from a multi-country vignette experiment, we examined how recruiters across different sex-segregated occupational fields assess male and female job applicants with unemployment experience. We found gender differences in the effect of unemployment, with disadvantages for men increasing with the share of women in an occupation. While the reverse pattern was observed in occupations with lower shares of women, the gender difference in unemployment effects was somewhat larger for men in female-dominated occupations. This was due to occupational variation in unemployment effects for both genders. However, focusing on applicants meeting the minimum skill requirements, only men's unemployment effect varied across occupational fields. Thus, occupational sex composition is an important factor in recruiter evaluations of unemployed applicants, intensifying the challenge of re-employment, particularly for men in female-dominated occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Tensions of Making Women's Marginalization Salient in Men-Dominated Workplaces (2025)
Zitatform
Hart, Chloe Grace (2025): Tensions of Making Women's Marginalization Salient in Men-Dominated Workplaces. In: Work and occupations, Jg. 52, H. 3, S. 358-387. DOI:10.1177/07308884241268704
Abstract
"Why might women who experience gender-based bias and harassment at work shy away from efforts to address gender inequality in their workplaces? Drawing on data from 52 interviews with women working in the Silicon Valley tech industry, I show that efforts to address women's marginalization in the men-dominated tech industry are complicated by the inscription of negative, gender essentialist stereotypes about women into narratives about why such initiatives are necessary. Interviewees voiced two rationales for not explicitly challenging women's marginalization. First, some women—particularly those whose race/ethnicity and age were typical of Silicon Valley tech workers—articulated a concern that such efforts may be interpreted as evidence that women are fundamentally different from, and deficient relative to, men. Second, women across race/ethnicity and age conveyed the concern that such efforts frame women as disempowered victims lacking agency. Both concerns represent a double bind: ignoring the marginalization that women face maintains a status quo rife with gender bias, but seeking to address it risks further entrenching negative stereotypes about women. These results illustrate both the durable nature of the gender status hierarchy and the unique ways that women of different intersecting identities confront it." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Couples' division of paid work and rising income inequality: A study of 21 OECD countries (2025)
Zitatform
Herzberg-Druker, Efrat (2025): Couples' division of paid work and rising income inequality: A study of 21 OECD countries. In: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Jg. 99. DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101084
Abstract
"Numerous scholars have explored the association between women's changing employment patterns and the changing income inequality in recent decades. While most studies indicate that increased women's employment reduces household inequality, a few suggest the opposite effect. This research investigated whether shifts in the division of paid work (i.e., changes in the working hours) among heterosexual couples, as compared to changes in women's work alone, contribute to changes in income inequality. It also examined whether the selection of couples into the different types of division of paid work based on their level of education is a mechanism underlying the growing inequality. Based on counterfactual analyses of data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), encompassing 21 OECD countries, the findings demonstrate shifts in couples' division of paid work, particularly the increase in fulltime dual-earner households, are associated with rising income inequality in most countries studied. However, changes in educational attainment were not found to be the mechanism underlying the association between changes in couples' division of paid work and changes in income inequality." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Strukturwandel am Arbeitsmarkt durch die ökologische Transformation - Folgen für Geschlechterverhältnisse auf dem Arbeitsmarkt: Expertise für den Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht der Bundesregierung (2025)
Zitatform
Hohendanner, Christian, Markus Janser & Florian Lehmer (2025): Strukturwandel am Arbeitsmarkt durch die ökologische Transformation - Folgen für Geschlechterverhältnisse auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Expertise für den Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin, 94 S.
Abstract
"Die vorliegende Expertise untersucht erstmals quantitativ die strukturellen Veränderungen des Arbeitsmarktes in Deutschland im Hinblick auf geschlechtsbezogene Aspekte, die im Zuge der ökologischen Transformation entstehen. Wir verwenden hierfür einen Tasks-basierten Ansatz zur Identifikation der betroffenen Akteur*innen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt. Dazu werden der Greenness-of-Jobs Index (GOJI) (Janser 2019, 2024), das IAB-Berufepanel (Version 2012-2022, inkl. GOJI) sowie deskriptive Statistiken auf Basis des IAB-Betriebspanels herangezogen. Das IAB-Berufepanel wie die Auswertungen des IAB-Betriebspanels sind auf der Homepage des IAB öffentlich zugänglich und können für weitere Analysen genutzt werden. Zusätzlich werden Maßnahmen diskutiert, die helfen könnten, mögliche Ungleichheiten in der ökologischen Transformation abzufedern und zu überwinden. Ziel der Expertise ist es, den Sachverständigen für den Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht eine fundierte empirische Grundlage zu den Veränderungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt und deren potenziellen Folgen für Geschlechterverhältnisse durch die ökologische Transformation zu liefern. Die Expertise zeigt auf, inwiefern Frauen und Männer gleichermaßen oder unterschiedlich von den Entwicklungen des Arbeitsmarktes profitieren bzw. betroffen sind. Es wird dargestellt, in welchen Branchen und Berufen sich Tätigkeitsfelder verändert haben und neue Beschäftigungsverhältnisse entstanden bzw. weggefallen sind – jeweils mit besonderem Fokus auf die Unterschiede zwischen Frauen und Männern. Vor dem Hintergrund aller zusammengetragenen Erkenntnisse wird abschließend diskutiert, inwiefern die bisherigen Ergebnisse darauf hindeuten, dass sich geschlechtsbezogene Unterschiede bzw. Ungleichheiten auf dem Arbeitsmarkt in der ökologischen Transformation eher angleichen oder weiter auseinanderentwickeln." (Textauszug, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
National Work-Family Policies and Gender Earnings Inequality in 26 OECD Countries, 1999 to 2019 (2025)
Zitatform
Hook, Jennifer L. & Meiying Li (2025): National Work-Family Policies and Gender Earnings Inequality in 26 OECD Countries, 1999 to 2019. In: Socius, Jg. 11, S. 1-21. DOI:10.1177/23780231251360042
Abstract
"The authors investigate whether work-family policies help incorporate women into the labor market, but exacerbate the gender earnings gap and motherhood penalty, especially for mothers and/or tertiary-educated women. The authors use repeated cross-sectional income data from the Luxembourg Income Study database (1999–2019) (n = 26 countries, 280 country-years, 2.9 million employees) combined with an original collection of indicators on work-family policies, labor market conditions, and gender norms. The authors find that only one work-family policy, long paid parental leave (longer than six months), is associated with a larger gender earnings gap for mothers and tertiary-educated women. The negative relationship between long paid leave and women’s earning percentile is not well explained by selection, full-time status, work hours, experience, occupation, or sector, suggesting discrimination mechanisms. These findings add to the growing evidence that long paid leave specifically, as opposed to work-family policies more generally, cleaves the labor market outcomes of women from men." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Role Attitudes and the Reproduction of Occupational Sex Segregation: An Analysis of Attitudes towards Women’s Voluntary Childlessness in Europe (2025)
Zitatform
Insarauto, Valeria & Danilo Bolano (2025): Gender Role Attitudes and the Reproduction of Occupational Sex Segregation: An Analysis of Attitudes towards Women’s Voluntary Childlessness in Europe. In: Work, Employment and Society, S. 1-25. DOI:10.1177/09500170251348821
Abstract
"This article contributes to the literature on gender role attitudes and the reproduction of occupational sex segregation by investigating how attitudes towards women’s voluntary childlessness relate to the embeddedness of individuals in sex-typed occupations. While previous studies have found that more favorable attitudes are more common among women than men, they have not established why this is so. We argue that the differing allocation of men and women to sex-typed occupations carries gender-specific pressures towards gender-role congruence, which are likely to shape the perceived costs of motherhood and, hence, attitudes towards female childlessness differently. We test this argument by drawing on European Social Survey data. Findings show that women with more favourable attitudes are most likely to work in male-dominated occupations and hold high-status positions, highlighting the enduring force and differentiated saliency of gender beliefs across sex-segregated occupations. We discuss the implications for the reproduction of occupational sex segregation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Tailored to Women, Provided to Men? Gendered Occupational Inequality in Access to Flexible Working-Time Arrangements (2025)
Zitatform
Jacobi, Aljoscha, Maik Hamjediers & Tabea Naujoks (2025): Tailored to Women, Provided to Men? Gendered Occupational Inequality in Access to Flexible Working-Time Arrangements. In: Social indicators research, Jg. 176, H. 3, S. 1179-1205. DOI:10.1007/s11205-024-03483-9
Abstract
"Numerous policy-makers and social scientists promote flexible working as a means to reconcile work and family life, often explicitly targeting women. Accordingly, one might expect that flexible working-time arrangements are more prevalent in occupations with a high share of female employees. Yet, previous evidence indicates the opposite. To address this puzzle, we investigate the occupational opportunity structures for flexible working. A devaluation argument proposes that employers perceive female-typed work as being of lower value, thus inhibiting the provision of flexible working-time arrangements in tfemale-dominated occupations. We evaluate this argument against alternative explanations, namely differences in the ability to bargain for flexible working and in structural or practical barriers to flexible working. Descriptive results based on German panel data (GSOEP, 2003 –2017) enriched with occupational-level information confirm that female-dominated occupations provide the least access to flexible work. Linear probability models with yearly fixed-effects indicate that power resources and structural barriers account for differences in flexible working between male-dominated and integrated occupations; yet an unexplained disadvantage for female-dominated occupations remains. Moreover, this disadvantage has grown between 2003 and 2017. We interpret this result as support of a cultural devaluation of female-dominated occupations in access to flexible working-time arrangements. Our findings highlight that the empirical reality of gendered occupational opportunity structures contradicts the gendered policy discourse on flexible work." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Can women bridge the gender class gap by choosing a gender-atypical field of study? A study based the on the German micro-census 1996–2016 (2025)
Zitatform
Konietzka, Dirk & Sebastian Wen (2025): Can women bridge the gender class gap by choosing a gender-atypical field of study? A study based the on the German micro-census 1996–2016. In: Journal of education and work, Jg. 37, H. 7/8, S. 550-567. DOI:10.1080/13639080.2025.2487421
Abstract
"The persistence of gender-stereotyped subject choices is considered as a detrimental factor for women’s labor market opportunities. Against this background, the paperfocusses on the labor market chances of women who graduated from a male-dominated field of study in higher education. We use a position in the upper service class as a criterion for successful job placement. Analyses of German micro-census data are conducted across labor market subsectors and over the period 1996–2016. Results show that class positions of women who graduated in male-dominated fields of study vary substantially by labor market segment. They are less likely than men to be employed in the upper service class specifically in large private sector firms, but at the same time more likely to be employed in the public sector. Over time, the private sector gender class gap has narrowed, but not disappeared." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Masculinity Norms and Their Economic Consequences (2025)
Zitatform
Matavelli, Ieda, Pauline Grosjean, Ralph De Haas & Victoria Baranov (2025): Masculinity Norms and Their Economic Consequences. (CEPR discussion paper / Centre for Economic Policy Research 20549), London, 37 S., Anhang.
Abstract
"While economists have extensively studied gender norms affecting women, masculinity norms — the informal rules that guide and constrain the behaviors of boys and men — remain underexplored. This review first examines how other disciplines have studied masculinity, providing economists with conceptual foundations and empirical patterns for understanding masculinity norms. We then discuss how the study of masculinity norms can inform the economics literature on gender gaps and men's outcomes across multiple domains: health behavior, labor supply and occupational choice, violence and aggression, and political preferences. We also discuss the paths for transmission and persistence of masculinity norms. Finally, using novel survey data from 70 countries, we present five stylized facts about masculinity norms. We document substantial global variation in these norms and demonstrate their predictive power for various socioeconomic and political Outcomes." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Are recruiters driving gender segregation? Evidence from the German apprenticeship market (2025)
Zitatform
Minssen, Luisa, Mark Levels, Harald Pfeifer & Caroline Wehner (2025): Are recruiters driving gender segregation? Evidence from the German apprenticeship market. In: German Journal of Human Resource Management, Jg. 39, H. 4, S. 336-366. DOI:10.1177/23970022241300060
Abstract
"Potential drivers of gender discrimination are recruiters, who are more likely to select applicants with characteristics similar to their own. This study explores whether recruiter characteristics (age, gender, and job position) drive gender discrimination in the recruitment of apprentices for gender-segregated occupations. A factorial survey experiment among 1872 firms in Germany estimates recruiters’ heterogeneous gender choices in male, female, and gender-mixed occupations. The study finds that female applicants are chosen less often for male-dominated occupations and more often for female-dominated occupations than male applicants. Moreover, older recruiters and firm owners are less likely to recruit female applicants for male-dominated occupations but more likely to recruit them for female-dominated occupations than younger recruiters and non-firm owners. By contrast, younger recruiters and HR professionals are more likely to recruit gender-neutrally to an occupation ’s dominating gender than older recruiters and non-HR professionals. This study shows that apprenticeship applicants of a gender opposed to the dominant gender of an occupation have a disadvantage in the apprenticeship market and that certain recruiters’ characteristics further impact this disadvantage." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Differences in Job Requirements: Change Within Careers and Across Cohorts (2025)
Zitatform
Schwartz, Shoshana, Peter Cappelli & Yang Yang (2025): Gender Differences in Job Requirements: Change Within Careers and Across Cohorts. In: Human Resource Management, Jg. 64, H. 2, S. 331-373. DOI:10.1002/hrm.22256
Abstract
"We examine differences in jobs held by men and women based on a measure not used before, the standard human resources measures of “knowledge, skills, and abilities” generated by job analyses. While there is an abundance of evidence on gender disparities in pay, we know much less in detail about differences in the work men and women perform and especially how these differences have changed over time. We use nationally representative data for two cohorts of college graduates, one entering the post-college workforce in 1994 and another in 2009, and we follow them for the first 10 years of their careers. We find that women generally held jobs with lower requirements relative to men. The gender gap in job requirements grew over the course of individuals' careers for the first cohort (1994–2003) but declined sharply for the second (2009–2018). We also find that among the second cohort, women received a wage premium for social skills that was greater than what men received." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
How Psychological Barriers Constrain Men’s Interest in Gender-Atypical Jobs and Facilitate Occupational Segregation (2025)
Zitatform
Suh, Eileen Y., Evan P. Apfelbaum & Michael I. Norton (2025): How Psychological Barriers Constrain Men’s Interest in Gender-Atypical Jobs and Facilitate Occupational Segregation. In: Organization Science, Jg. 36, H. 4, S. 1314-1332. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2023.17550
Abstract
"Scholarship regarding occupational gender segregation has almost exclusively focused on women’s experiences (e.g., as targets of discrimination in masculine domains), yet understanding factors that perpetuate men’s underrepresentation in traditionally feminine occupations is equally important. We examine a consequential dynamic early in the job search process in which individuals come to learn that an occupation that fits them is perceived as feminine versus masculine. Our research develops and tests the prediction that femininity or masculinity of occupations will exert a stronger impact on men’s (versus women’s) interest in them such that men will be less interested in gender-atypical occupations than women. Across five studies (n = 4,477), we consistently observed robust evidence for this prediction among diverse samples, including high school students (Study 1), unemployed job seekers (Study 2), U.S. adults (Study 3), and undergraduates (Study 4) and using experimental and archival methods. We observed this asymmetry after controlling for alternative accounts related to economic factors (e.g., expected salary), suggesting that they alone cannot fully explain men’s lack ofinterest in feminine occupations as previously discussed in the literature. Further, we consistently observed that men, compared with women, show heightened sensitivity to gender-based occupational status, and this greater sensitivity explains men’s (versus women’s) reduced interest in gender-atypical occupations. Though past scholarship suggests that increasing pay is key to stoking men’s interest in feminine occupations, our research suggests that targeting men’s underlying psychological concern—sensitivity to gender-based occupational status—may be an underappreciated pathway to reducing gender segregation. Supplemental Material: The data, materials, preregistration, and ancillary analyses for all studies are available at https://osf.io/h4mgx/?view_only=9a4dbfc9d122417c880354d6b3462072 and at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17550 ." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Fairness Evaluations of Higher Education Graduates’ Earnings: The Role of Female Preference for Equality and Self‐Interest (2025)
Zitatform
Zamberlan, Anna, Diana Roxana Galos, Susanne Strauss & Thomas Hinz (2025): Fairness Evaluations of Higher Education Graduates’ Earnings: The Role of Female Preference for Equality and Self‐Interest. In: The British journal of sociology, Jg. 76, H. 3, S. 541-552. DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13192
Abstract
"Educational and occupational horizontal segregation contribute significantly to economic inequalities, especially in contexts with a strong correspondence between fields of study and occupational outputs, such as in Germany. However, the extent to which individuals perceive disparities in economic returns across different fields of study as fair and the factors influencing these fairness evaluations remain largely unexplored. This study aims to understand fairness evaluations by assessing two theoretical explanations and their interrelation: (1) female preference for equality, where women generally favour smaller earnings disparities, and (2) biases leading to higher reward expectations for individuals in the same field of study as the evaluator. Our empirical research draws on a novel survey experiment from the German Student Survey (2021), in which higher education students evaluated the fairness of realistic earnings for graduates from various fields of study. These earnings relate to the entry phase of an individual's career, reflecting differences in economic returns exclusively tied to fields of study, independent of occupational or life trajectories. Our findings support the female preference for equality and self-interest theoretical perspectives, revealing that women and respondents in fields associated with lower-earning jobs tend to perceive greater unfairness. We further find evidence of an interaction between the two mechanisms, with women being particularly likely to perceive greater unfairness when it aligns with their self-interest." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gleichstellung in der sozial-ökologischen Transformation: Gutachten für den Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht der Bundesregierung (2025)
Zitatform
(2025): Gleichstellung in der sozial-ökologischen Transformation. Gutachten für den Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht der Bundesregierung. (Verhandlungen des Deutschen Bundestages. Drucksachen 20/15105 Vierter), Berlin, 259 S.
Abstract
"Der Vierte Gleichstellungsbericht widmet sich dem Klimawandel und Klimapolitiken in Deutschland unter dem Aspekt der Geschlechtergerechtigkeit. Die Sachverständigen waren beauftragt Ursachen und Auswirkungen des Klimawandels sowie Auswirkungen umwelt- und klimapolitischer Maßnahmen auf die Geschlechterverhältnisse darzustellen, Empfehlungen zur gleichstellungsorientierten Gestaltung der ökologischen Transformation zu erarbeiten, und Empfehlungen zu Strukturen, Instrumenten und institutionellen Mechanismen für eine an Art. 3 Abs. 2 und 3 Grundgesetz orientierte Gleichstellungs-, Umwelt- und Klimapolitik zu entwickeln. Die von Bundesgleichstellungsministerin Lisa Paus im März 2023 berufene Sachverständigenkommission übergab ihr Gutachten Anfang Januar 2025 an die Ministerin. Dieses wurde Anfang März 2025 veröffentlicht. Am 12. März 2025 beschloss das Bundeskabinett die Stellungnahme der Bundesregierung zum Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht, die zusammen mit dem Gutachten als Gleichstellungsbericht veröffentlicht wurde (Bundestags-Drucksache 20/15105). Der Bericht wurde anschließend dem Bundestag und dem Bundesrat vorgelegt." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
Weiterführende Informationen
Hier finden Sie die Expertisen und Hintergrundberichte zum Vierten Gleichstellungsbericht. -
Literaturhinweis
Gender occupational segregation: a new approach to quantifying the effect of educational segregation (2024)
Zitatform
Acosta-Ballesteros, Juan, María Del Pilar Osorno-Del Rosal & Olga María Rodríguez-Rodríguez (2024): Gender occupational segregation: a new approach to quantifying the effect of educational segregation. In: Applied Economics, S. 1-15. DOI:10.1080/00036846.2024.2423067
Abstract
"This article analyses the impact of educational segregation on the gender gap in the probability of working in a gendered or gender-balanced occupation, which is our measure of occupational segregation. Specifically, our methodology allows quantifying two different effects of education on this gap: one due to girls and boys choosing different educational options (presorting), and the other due to men and women with the same education entering the same or different occupations (postsorting). Using a sample of university graduates from Spain, a country with a highly segregated labor market, we conclude that the gender composition of education and occupation are strongly related. However, the greater presence of women in female-dominated jobs is not only due to them choosing female-dominated degrees, but also due to many women from gender-balanced, and even some from male-dominated programs, working in female-dominated occupations. Thus, reducing educational segregation does not seem to be enough to fight against occupational segregation. It is also necessary to guarantee that men and women enjoy the same opportunities in the labour market, removing discrimination practices, and to ensure that both, workers and employers, do not make decisions based on gender role expectations or stereotypes." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Green Jobs and the Future of Work for Women and Men (2024)
Alexander, Naomi-Rose; Cazzaniga, Mauro ; Mondragon, Jorge; Jaumotte, Ms. Florence; Fabrizio, Ms. Stefania; Li, Longji; Priano, Sahar; Tavares, Ms. Marina Mendes;Zitatform
Alexander, Naomi-Rose, Mauro Cazzaniga, Ms. Stefania Fabrizio, Ms. Florence Jaumotte, Longji Li, Jorge Mondragon, Sahar Priano & Ms. Marina Mendes Tavares (2024): Green Jobs and the Future of Work for Women and Men. (IMF staff discussion note / International Monetary Fund 2024,003), Washington, DC, 46 S.
Abstract
"The transition to a sustainable and green economy requires workers to move out of carbon-intensive jobs and workers to move into green jobs. The pace and effectiveness of the transition hinge not only on climate policies but also on the skills and adaptability of workers. Evidence suggests that economies with a robust supply of STEM-educated workers and a more equal treatment of women are better placed to transition faster and at a lower cost to a green economy, even after controlling for other country characteristics, because these economies generate more green innovation and face lower bottlenecks in expanding the green workforce. Altogether, climate policies, particularly energy taxes, in these economies are associated with emission reductions that are 2 to 4 percentage points larger than in economies with a less inclusive and educated workforce. While green jobs have been growing worldwide, men currently hold close to two-thirds of these positions and women only one-third. Green jobs are associated with a 7 percent premium for men and an even higher premium of 12 percent for women, suggesting that men's and women's labor supply may not meet demand. These findings highlight the critical need for educational and labor policies that promote skill enhancement and gender inclusivity, to ensure a sufficient supply of workers for the green economy and that all workers can benefit from the green transition. Finally, AI could be beneficial for workers in green jobs." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Self-reinforcing Glass Ceilings (2024)
Avenancio-León, Carlos F.; Piccolo, Alessio; Shen, Leslie Sheng;Zitatform
Avenancio-León, Carlos F., Alessio Piccolo & Leslie Sheng Shen (2024): Self-reinforcing Glass Ceilings. (Working papers / Federal Reserve Bank of Boston 2024-14), Boston, 89 S.
Abstract
"After the gender pay gap narrows, what labor choices do men and women make? Several factors contribute to the persistence of the pay gap, such as workplace flexibility, systemic discrimination, and career costs of family. We show that how the labor market responds to the narrowing of the gap is just as pivotal for understanding this persistence. When the gender pay gap declines in a specific sector, women are relatively more likely to seek jobs in that sector, while men readjust their search to less equitable sectors. These compositional effects decrease female participation in less equitable sectors, which typically offer higher wages, reinforcing gender stereotypes and social norms that contribute to the glass ceiling. Through these effects, the same forces that reduce the gender pay gap at the bottom of the pay distribution also contribute to the persistence of gender inequities at the top. This self-reinforcing cycle underscores the need for reforms that are cross-sectoral and comprehensive to effectively achieve meaningful reductions in gender inequities across the labor market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
DIW Berlin: Technological Progress, Occupational Structure, and Gender Gaps in the German Labour Market (2024)
Zitatform
Bachmann, Ronald & Myrielle Gonschor (2024): DIW Berlin: Technological Progress, Occupational Structure, and Gender Gaps in the German Labour Market. (SOEPpapers on multidisciplinary panel data research at DIW Berlin 1207), Berlin, 52 S.
Abstract
"We analyze if technological progress and the change in the occupational structure have improved women’s position in the labor market. We show that women increasingly work in non-routine manual and in interactive occupations. However, the observed narrowing of the gender wage gap is entirely driven by declining gender wag gaps within, rather than between, occupations. A decomposition exercise reveals that while explained factors have become more important contributors to the gender wage gap, the importance of unexplained factors factors has strongly declined. Therefore, unequal treatment based on unobservables, i.e. discrimination, is likely to have declined over time. Finally, technological change as measured by job tasks plays an ambiguous role. Institutional factors, and in particular part-time employment, are still a major driver of the gender wage gap." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Inequality in the Labor Market: Continuing Progress? (2024)
Zitatform
Blau, Francine D. (2024): Gender Inequality in the Labor Market: Continuing Progress? (IZA discussion paper / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit 17558), Bonn, 48 S.
Abstract
"This article examines the trends in women's economic outcomes in the United States focusing primarily on labor force participation, occupational attainment, and the gender wage gap. The author first highlights considerable progress on all dimensions prior to the 1990s followed by a slowing or stalling of gains thereafter, with a plateauing of female labor force participation trends and a slowing of women's occupational and wage convergence with men. She considers the likelihood of a resumption of progress in narrowing gender gaps in these areas, concluding it is unlikely without policy intervention. She then considers some new policy initiatives addressing work-family issues and labor market discrimination that may hold potential for increasing female labor force participation and narrowing gender inequities in the labor market." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Fifty Years of Breakthroughs and Barriers: Women in Economics, Policy, and Leadership (2024)
Zitatform
Blau, Francine D. & Lisa M. Lynch (2024): Fifty Years of Breakthroughs and Barriers: Women in Economics, Policy, and Leadership. In: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Jg. 711, H. 1, S. 225-244. DOI:10.1177/00027162241292175
Abstract
"We provide an overview of what has happened for women over the past 50 years as they worked to break through professional barriers in economics, policy, and institutional leadership. We chart the progress of women in higher education at the college level and beyond and then examine women’s representation at the upper levels of academia, government, law, medicine, and management. We begin our description of trends in 1972, when Title IX was enacted to prohibit sex-based discrimination in federally funded educational programs. The data paint a picture of considerable progress but also persistent inequities. We then go on to consider possible explanations for the continuing gender differences and some of the empirical evidence on the factors identified." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Selbstwahrnehmung von Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen: Eine Determinante zur Erklärung der geschlechtsspezifischen Arbeitsmarktsegregation in Deutschland? (2024)
Bojić, Birthe;Zitatform
Bojić, Birthe (2024): Selbstwahrnehmung von Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen. Eine Determinante zur Erklärung der geschlechtsspezifischen Arbeitsmarktsegregation in Deutschland? (Studien zur Berufs- und Professionsforschung 44), Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač, 256 S.
Abstract
"Die Studie „Selbstwahrnehmung von Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen“ analysiert die Herausforderungen, denen Frauen in einem Männerberuf gegenüberstehen. Die qualitative Studie fokussiert Frauen in MINT-Berufen sowie im Handwerk und deckt Selbstzuschreibungen zu beruflich notwendigen Fähigkeiten auf. Eine zentrale Rolle nehmen Geschlechterstereotype ein, die sowohl die Frauen selbst als auch ihr Umfeld beeinflussen. In Folge der stereotypgeprägten Wahrnehmung besteht das Empfinden, sich als Frau in einem männlich dominierten Arbeitsumfeld besonders beweisen zu müssen. Frauen als Minderheit sind in einem Männerberuf besonders sichtbar, was zu einer unerwünschten Aufmerksamkeit führt. Damit einhergehend sind Erwartungen an die Leistungsfähigkeit mit dem Geschlecht verknüpft .Die Selbstwahrnehmung von Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen wird einerseits durch individuelle Eigenschaftszuschreibungen, andererseits durch selbst- und fremderzeugte Barrieren beeinflusst. Selbst- und Fremderzeugte Barrieren, die u.a. auf in den Berufsfeldern vorherrschende männliche Normen und Strukturen zurückzuführen sind, hemmen den beruflichen Aufstieg und erschweren den beruflichen Alltag. Es werden Einblicke in das berufliche Erleben und die Bewältigungsstrategien gegeben. Die angewendeten Bewältigungsstrategien stehen dabei in einem engen Zusammenhang mit den selbst zugeschriebenen Eigenschaften.Diese qualitative Studie zeigt, dass Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen nach wie vor nachhaltig durch das Vorherrschen eines männlich dominierten Umfeldes beeinflusst werden. Das männlich dominierte Berufsumfeld zeichnet sich durch geschlechtsspezifische Stereotype und stereotypisierte Zuschreibungen aus. Diese beeinflussen signifikant die Kommunikations- und Verhaltensmuster und damit das alltägliche berufliche Erleben von Frauen in nicht-traditionellen Berufsrollen." (Verlagsangaben, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Prescribed Occupations and the Wage Gap (2024)
Broso, Matteo; Muratori, Caterina; Gallice, Andrea;Zitatform
Broso, Matteo, Andrea Gallice & Caterina Muratori (2024): Gender Prescribed Occupations and the Wage Gap. (GLO discussion paper / Global Labor Organization 1529), Essen, 20 S.
Abstract
"Men and women often sort into different jobs, and male-dominated jobs typically pay more than female-dominated ones. Why is that the case? We propose a model where workers have heterogeneous attitudes with respect to the social norms that define gender prescribed occupations and face endogenous social costs when entering jobs deemed "appropriate" for the other gender. We show that: (i) workers trade off identity and wage considerations in deciding where to work; (ii) asymmetric social norms contribute to the gender pay gap by deterring women from entering higher-paying male-dominated sectors; (iii) breaking social norms generates positive externalities, reducing social stigma for everyone. Therefore, in equilibrium, there are too few social norm breakers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Model-Based Estimation of Small Area Dissimilarity Indexes: An Application to Sex Occupational Segregation in Spain (2024)
Zitatform
Bugallo, María, Domingo Morales, María Dolores Esteban & Maria Chiara Pagliarella (2024): Model-Based Estimation of Small Area Dissimilarity Indexes: An Application to Sex Occupational Segregation in Spain. In: Social indicators research, Jg. 174, H. 2, S. 473-501. DOI:10.1007/s11205-024-03393-w
Abstract
"This paper introduces a new statistical methodology for estimating Duncan dissimilarity indexes of occupational segregation by sex in administrative areas and time periods. Given that direct estimators of the proportion of men (or women) in the group of employed people for each occupational sector are not accurate enough in the considered estimation domains, we fit to them a three-fold Fay–Herriot model with random effects at three hierarchical levels. Based on the fitted area-level model, empirical best predictors of the cited proportions and Duncan segregation indexes are derived. A parametric bootstrap algorithm is implemented to estimate the mean squared error. Some simulation studies are included to show how the proposed predictors have a good balance between bias and mean squared error. Data from the Spanish Labour Force Survey are used to illustrate the performance of the new statistical methodology and to give some light about the current state of sex occupational segregation by province in Spain. Research claims that there is a sex gap that persists despite advances in the inclusion of women in the labour market in recent years and that is related to the unequal sharing of family responsabilities and the stigmas still present in modern societies." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Anhaltende berufliche Geschlechtersegregation: In Ost wie West arbeiten Frauen und Männer häufig in unterschiedlichen Berufen (2024)
Zitatform
Bächmann, Ann-Christin, Corinna Kleinert & Brigitte Schels (2024): Anhaltende berufliche Geschlechtersegregation: In Ost wie West arbeiten Frauen und Männer häufig in unterschiedlichen Berufen. (IAB-Kurzbericht 03/2024), Nürnberg, 8 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.KB.2403
Abstract
"Trotz einer Annäherung der Arbeitsmärkte zeichnen sich Ost- und Westdeutschland bis heute durch markante Unterschiede in der Branchenstruktur sowie in der Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen aus. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersuchen die Autorinnen, ob und wie sich auch die berufliche Trennung von Frauen und Männern unterscheidet. Der Kurzbericht zeigt: Auf dem deutschen Arbeitsmarkt besteht die ausgeprägte berufliche Geschlechtersegregation fort – in Ost- wie in Westdeutschland. Im Untersuchungszeitraum zwischen 2012 und 2019 ist das Ausmaß der beruflichen Trennung von Frauen und Männern nur leicht zurückgegangen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
Weiterführende Informationen
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender Stereotyping in the Labor Market: A Descriptive Analysis of Almost One Million Job Ads across 710 Occupations and Occupational Positions (2024)
Zitatform
Damelang, Andreas, Ann-Katrin Rückel & Michael Stops (2024): Gender Stereotyping in the Labor Market: A Descriptive Analysis of Almost One Million Job Ads across 710 Occupations and Occupational Positions. (LASER discussion papers 153), Erlangen, 21 S.
Abstract
"This study presents patterns of gender stereotyping in job ads in the German labor market. Using a large dataset of job ads from the "BA-Jobbörse", one of the largest online job portals in Germany, we apply a machine learning algorithm to identify the explicitly verbalized job descriptions. We then use a dictionary of agentic (male-associated) and communal (female-associated) signal words to measure gender stereotyping in the job descriptions. We collect information for 710 different occupations. Our first result shows that more jobs are female-stereotyped than male-stereotyped. We then take the example of two occupational groups that reveal clear differences in tasks contents and are highly relevant regarding important megatrends like digitalization and the demographic change: one the one hand, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and, on the other hand, Health and Social Services occupations. Additionally, we investigate the hierarchical aspect of occupational gender segregation. We distinguish jobs according to their required skill level and whether or not they are supervisory and leadership positions. In contrast to our first result, we find within STEM occupations as well as in supervisory and leadership positions that the majority of jobs is male-stereotyped. Our findings indicate a positive association between gender stereotyping and occupational gender segregation, suggesting that gender stereotyping in job ads might contribute to the underrepresentation of women in certain occupations and occupational positions." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Ähnliche Treffer
auch erschienen als: IAB-Discussion Paper, 13/2024 -
Literaturhinweis
Gender Stereotyping in the Labor Market: A Descriptive Analysis of Almost One Million Job Ads across 710 Occupations and Occupational Positions (2024)
Zitatform
Damelang, Andreas, Ann-Katrin Rückel & Michael Stops (2024): Gender Stereotyping in the Labor Market: A Descriptive Analysis of Almost One Million Job Ads across 710 Occupations and Occupational Positions. (IAB-Discussion Paper 13/2024), Nürnberg, 23 S. DOI:10.48720/IAB.DP.2413
Abstract
"Wir analysieren Muster stereotypisierter Darstellungen von Geschlechtern (gender stereotyping) in Stellenanzeigen des deutschen Arbeitsmarkts und vergleichen diese Muster zwischen verschiedenen Berufsabgrenzungen. Basierend auf einem umfangreichen Stellenanzeigen-Datensatz der BA-Jobbörse, einem der größten Online-Jobportale Deutschlands, wendeten wir einen Machine Learning-Algorithmus an, um den Teil der Stellentexte zu identifizieren, in dem zu erfüllende Anforderungen und zu verrichtende Tätigkeiten explizit beschrieben werden. Wir nutzten ein eigens erstelltes Wörterbuch agentischer (männlich-konnotierter) und kommunaler (weiblich-konnotierter) Signalwörter, um die Stereotypisierung von Geschlechtern in Stellenbeschreibungen zu messen. Die war möglich für 710 Berufe. Die Ergebnisse zeigen zunächst, dass in unserer Stichprobe Berufe eher weiblich als männlich stereotypisiert sind. Wir untersuchen im Weiteren zwei Berufsgruppen näher, die sich deutlich hinsichtlich ihrer Anforderungen und Tätigkeitsinhalte unterscheiden, und hohe Relevanz bezüglich wichtiger Megatrends wie der Digitalisierung und dem demographischen Wandel haben: einerseits Mathematik, Informatik, Natur- und Ingenieurwissenschaft und Technik (MINT), und andererseits Berufe im Gesundheits- und Sozialwesen. Dabei unterschieden wir die enthaltenen einzelnen Berufe zum einen nach ihren Anforderungsniveaus und zum anderen danach, ob sie mit einfachen bzw. fachlichen Positionen oder mit Aufsichts- und Führungspositionen verbunden sind. Entgegen dem allgemeinen Befund, dass die von uns beobachteten Berufe überwiegend weiblich stereotypisiert sind, finden wir, dass die MINT-Berufe sowie Aufsichts- und Führungspositionen eher männlich stereotypisiert sind. Unsere Ergebnisse belegen einen positiven Zusammenhang zwischen Geschlechter-Stereotypisierung und berufsbezogener Geschlechtersegregation. Dies legt nahe, dass die Geschlechter-Stereotypisierung in Stellenanzeigen dazu beiträgt, dass Frauen in bestimmten Berufen und Berufspositionen unterrepräsentiert sind." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
Ähnliche Treffer
auch erschienen als: LASER discussion papers, 153 -
Literaturhinweis
Breaking Gender Barriers: Experimental Evidence on Men in Pink-Collar Jobs (2024)
Delfino, Alexia;Zitatform
Delfino, Alexia (2024): Breaking Gender Barriers: Experimental Evidence on Men in Pink-Collar Jobs. In: The American economic review, Jg. 114, H. 6, S. 1816-1853. DOI:10.1257/aer.20220582
Abstract
"I investigate men’s limited entry into female-dominated sectors through a large-scale field experiment. The design exogenously varies recruitment messages by showing photographs of current workers (male or female) and providing information on the share of workers who received high evaluations in the past (higher or lower). A male photograph has no impact on men’s applications, but informing about a lower share of high evaluations encourages men to apply and enables the employer to hire and retain more talented men. The impact of this informational intervention remains positive for the employer also accounting for its effects on female applicants and hires. (JEL C93, D83, J16, J22, J23, J24, M51)" (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Role (in-)congruity and the Catch 22 for female executives: how stereotyping contributes to the gender pay gap at top executive level (2024)
Zitatform
Diederich, Sarah, Anja Iseke, Kerstin Pull & Martin Schneider (2024): Role (in-)congruity and the Catch 22 for female executives: how stereotyping contributes to the gender pay gap at top executive level. In: The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Jg. 35, H. 7, S. 1283-1311. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2023.2273331
Abstract
"We examine to what extent the gender pay gap at top executive level is linked to gender stereotypes, i.e. to societal beliefs about the attributes women and men possess and the roles they ought to perform. We theorize that, even at the highest hierarchical level of an organization, executive functions are gender stereotyped: some (such as IT) are considered typically ‘masculine’, while others (such as human resources) are considered typically ‘feminine’. We argue gender stereotyping at the executive level to be related to pay such that masculine functions are paid more than feminine ones. Referring to role congruity theory, we further argue that women are paid better when they hold less masculine and therefore more role congruous functions. We find supportive evidence for both predictions when studying large European companies across the years 2014 to 2018. Pay data for 353 executives were linked to results of a survey in which participants were asked to rate the masculinity of the areas of responsibility of different executive functions. We find an empirical pattern that reflects a Catch 22 situation in which women executives appear unable to increase their pay by switching to more masculine functions that are, on average, better paid." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Taylor & Francis) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Gender Application Gap: Do Men and Women Apply for the Same Jobs? (2024)
Zitatform
Fluchtmann, Jonas, Anita M. Glenny, Nikolaj A. Harmon & Jonas Maibom (2024): The Gender Application Gap: Do Men and Women Apply for the Same Jobs? In: American Economic Journal. Economic Policy, Jg. 16, H. 2, S. 182-219. DOI:10.1257/pol.20210607
Abstract
"Men and women tend to hold different jobs. Are these differences present already in the types of jobs men and women apply for? Using administrative data on job applications made by the universe of Danish unemployment insurance recipients, we provide evidence on gender differences in applied-for jobs for the broader labor market. Across a range of job characteristics, we find large gender gaps in the share of applications going to different job types even among observationally similar men and women. In a standard decomposition, gender differences in applications can explain more than 70 percent of the residual gender wage gap." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Anforderungs- und Verdienstniveaus von "Frauen"- und "Männerberufen" im Vergleich: Detailergebnisse auf Basis des Comparable-Worth-Index 2018 (2024)
Heilmann, Tom; Klammer, Ute; Klenner, Christina;Zitatform
Heilmann, Tom, Christina Klenner & Ute Klammer (2024): Anforderungs- und Verdienstniveaus von "Frauen"- und "Männerberufen" im Vergleich: Detailergebnisse auf Basis des Comparable-Worth-Index 2018. (IAQ-Forschung 2024-02), Duisburg, 11 S. DOI:10.17185/duepublico/82535
Abstract
"Der Comparable-Worth-Index (kurz: CW-Index) ist ein statistisches Instrument, mit dem Arbeitsanforderungen und Belastungen in unterschiedlichen Berufen geschlechtsneutral miteinander verglichen werden können. Er wurde im Rahmen eines von der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung geförderten Projekts am Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation (IAQ) der Universität Duisburg-Essen und dem Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Institut (WSI) entwickelt. Analysen auf Basis des CW-Index zeigen, dass Berufe mit einem hohen Frauenanteil ("Frauenberufe") deutlich schlechter entlohnt werden als vergleichbar anspruchsvolle Berufe mit einem hohen Männeranteil ("Männerberufe"). Die ungleiche Bewertung von Anforderungen in "Frauen"- und "Männerberufen" trägt wesentlich zum Gender Pay Gap bei (Klammer et al. 2018a, 2022). Die ursprünglichen Berechnungen des CW-Index basierten auf Daten der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2012 (Hall et al. 2020a). Die entsprechenden Ergebnisse wurden 2018 zusammen mit umfassenden inhaltlichen und methodischen Ausführungen in der Reihe "IAQ-Forschung" (Klammer et al. 2018a) sowie inhaltsgleich als "WSI Study" (Klammer et al. 2018b) veröffentlicht. In späteren Veröffentlichungen wurden die Berechnungen unter Verwendung der Daten der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2018 (Hall et al. 2020b) aktualisiert. Die aktualisierten Befunde finden sich insbesondere in Klammer et al. (2022). In Reaktion auf Anfragen aus Wissenschaft und Praxis bietet dieser Bericht nach einer knappen Darstellung des Projekthintergrunds (Abschnitt 2) und der methodischen Erläuterungen (Abschnitt 3) eine detaillierte, bisher nicht veröffentlichte Übersicht zu den auf Basis der BIBB-BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2018 ermittelten Anforderungsniveaus, durchschnittlichen Stundenlöhnen und Frauenanteilen für einzelne Berufsgruppen (Abschnitt 4). Der Bericht schließt mit einem Fazit (Abschnitt 5)." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Promoting men and women to management: Putting the glass escalator paradox in the establishment context (2024)
Zitatform
Kronberg, Anne-Kathrin, Anna Gerlach & Markus Gangl (2024): Promoting men and women to management: Putting the glass escalator paradox in the establishment context. In: Social science research, Jg. 120. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103003
Abstract
"Research around the “glass escalator” demonstrates that men receive promotions faster than womenin women-dominated occupations. However, it remains unclear how overall establishment composition affects the glass escalator. We use German longitudinal linked employer-employee data (LIAB) between 2012 and 2019 to examine how occupational and establishment gender composition shape gender differences in promotions to management. Establishment gender composition moderates the glass escalator, meaning women's mobility disadvantages in women-dominated jobs are most pronounced in men-dominated establishments. We hypothesize that changing occupational status is a central mechanism: When occupations mirror the composition of the establishment, their status increases locally. Higher occupational status offsets lower leadership expectations attributed to women and increases women's promotion odds relative to their male colleagues." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2024 Elsevier) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The effect of gender norms on gender-based sorting across occupations (2024)
Zitatform
Morales, Marina & Miriam Marcén (2024): The effect of gender norms on gender-based sorting across occupations. In: Review of Economics of the Household, Jg. 22, H. 2, S. 831-864. DOI:10.1007/s11150-023-09683-5
Abstract
"Despite the notable progress that has been made in bridging the gap between women and men in the world of work, women are still underrepresented in many occupations. In this article, the effect of gender norms on whether women enter male-dominated occupations is analysed using differences in gender equality among early-arrival migrants. The variations in gender norms according to the cultural backgrounds of those migrants by country of origin are exploited to identify their impact on occupational choices. Using data from the American Community Survey, it is found that greater gender equality in the country of origin reduces the gender gap in male-dominated occupations. Suggestive evidence is further shown on the roles of job flexibility and women’s relative preferences for family-friendlyjobs in shaping gender-based sorting across occupations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Labour market segmentation and the gender wage gap in Spain (2024)
Zitatform
Núñez, Hernández Fernando, Carlos Usabiaga & de Toledo Pablo Álvarez (2024): Labour market segmentation and the gender wage gap in Spain. In: International Journal of Manpower, Jg. 45, H. 10, S. 16-41. DOI:10.1108/IJM-10-2023-0601
Abstract
"Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyze the gender wage gap (GWG) in Spain adopting a labor market segmentation approach. Once we obtain the different labor segments (or idiosyncratic labor markets), we are able to decompose the GWG into its observed and unobserved heterogeneity components. Design/methodology/approach We use the data from the Continuous Sample of Working Lives for the year 2021 (matched employer–employee [EE] data). Contingency tables and clustering techniques are applied to employment data to identify idiosyncratic labour markets where men and/or women of different ages tend to match/associate with different sectors of activity and occupation groups. Once this “heatmap” of labour associations is known, we can analyze its hottest areas (the idiosyncratic labor markets) from the perspective of wage discrimination by gender (Oaxaca-Blinder model). Findings In Spain, in general, men are paid more than women, and this is not always justified by their respective attributes. Among our results, the fact stands out that women tend to move to those idiosyncratic markets (biclusters) where the GWG (in favour of men) is smaller. Research limitations/implications It has not been possible to obtain remuneration data by job-placement, but an annual EE relationship is used. Future research should attempt to analyse the GWG across the wage distribution in the different idiosyncratic markets. Practical implications Our combination of methodologies can be adapted to other economies and variables and provides detailed information on the labour-matching process and gender wage discrimination in segmented labor markets. Social implications Our contribution is very important for labor market policies, trying to reduce unfair inequalities. Originality/value The study of the GWG from a novel labor segmentation perspective can be interesting for other researchers, institutions and policy makers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Emerald Group) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Why We Should Stop Trying to Fix Women: How Context Shapes and Constrains Women's Career Trajectories (2024)
Zitatform
Ryan, Michelle K. & Thekla Morgenroth (2024): Why We Should Stop Trying to Fix Women: How Context Shapes and Constrains Women's Career Trajectories. In: Annual Review of Psychology, Jg. 75, H. 1, S. 555-572. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-032620-030938
Abstract
"In this review we examine two classes of interventions designed to achieve workplace gender equality: ( a) those designed to boost motivations and ambition, such as those that aim to attract more women into roles where they are underrepresented; and ( b) those that try to provide women with needed abilities to achieve these positions. While such initiatives are generally well meaning, they tend to be based upon (and reinforce) stereotypes of what women lack. Such a deficit model leads to interventions that attempt to “fix” women rather than address the structural factors that are the root of gender inequalities. We provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why fixing women is unlikely to be successful. As an alternative, we focus on understanding how organizational context and culture maintain these inequalities by looking at how they shape and constrain ( a) women's motivations and ambitions, and ( b) the expression and interpretation of their skills and attributes. In doing so, we seek to shift the interventional focus from women themselves to the systems and structures in which they are embedded." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Making and Breaking Gender Inequalities in Work (2024)
Rönnmar, Mia; Hayter, Susan;Zitatform
Rönnmar, Mia & Susan Hayter (Hrsg.) (2024): Making and Breaking Gender Inequalities in Work. (ILERA Publication series), Boca Raton: Elgar, 206 S. DOI:10.4337/9781035337477
Abstract
"This timely book expertly analyses the persistence of gender inequalities in work. Despite the progress made through frameworks regulating work and employment relations, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated gender divides in labour markets. The authors present innovative ways to promote gender equality in a variety of industrial relations systems, welfare state models and labour market sectors." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Elgar) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Miss-Allocation: The Value of Workplace Gender Composition and Occupational Segregation (2024)
Schuh, Rachel;Zitatform
Schuh, Rachel (2024): Miss-Allocation: The Value of Workplace Gender Composition and Occupational Segregation. (Staff reports / Federal Reserve Bank of New York 1092), New York, NY, 98 S. DOI:10.59576/sr.1092
Abstract
"I analyze the value workers ascribe to the gender composition of their workplace and the consequences of these valuations for occupational segregation, tipping, and welfare. To elicit these valuations, I survey 9,000 U.S. adults using a hypothetical job choice experiment. This reveals that on average women and men value gender diversity, but these average preferences mask substantial heterogeneity. Older female workers are more likely to value gender homophily. This suggests that gender norms and discrimination, which have declined over time, may help explain some women’s desire for homophily. Using these results, I estimate a structural model of occupation choice to assess the influence of gender composition preferences on gender sorting and welfare. I find that workers’ composition valuations are not large enough to create tipping points, but they do reduce female employment in male-dominated occupations substantially. Reducing segregation could improve welfare: making all occupations evenly gender balanced improves utility as much as a 0.4 percent wage increase for women and a 1 percent wage increase for men, on average." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Organizational demography and gender authority gaps in Dutch workplaces (2024)
Zitatform
Stojmenovska, Dragana (2024): Organizational demography and gender authority gaps in Dutch workplaces. In: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Jg. 91. DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100937
Abstract
"Social stratification research increasingly draws attention to the role of workplaces for the (re)production of categorical inequalities. This article studies the relationship between differences between men’s and women’s chances of having a position of workplace authority – the gender authority gap – and the demographic characteristics of the organization they work in. Using unique linked employer-employee data representative of large workplaces in the Netherlands and individuals working in these organizations, I document larger gender authority gaps in organizations with larger shares of men and organizations where men have higher status than women in terms of other categorical distinctions, for example where their percentage of non-migrants is higher relative to women’s. Crucially, these findings are net of women’s and men’s individual status characteristics and human capital and related organizational characteristics. This article contributes to the literature on the gender authority gap by showing that women may be unable to reach desired jobs partially because of working in an organization with a particular demographic composition or intersection of status distinctions even when they have the qualifications to do so. In addition, the study contributes to the emerging relational inequalities literature that has thus far focused on earnings inequality by showing that predictions from this literature are consistent with the unequal distribution of desirable jobs." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2024 Elsevier) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Gendered wage returns to changes in non-routine job tasks: Evidence from Germany (2024)
Zitatform
Wicht, Alexandra, Nora Müller & Reinhard Pollak (2024): Gendered wage returns to changes in non-routine job tasks: Evidence from Germany. In: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Jg. 93. DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100963
Abstract
"The labor market exhibits persistent occupational segregation by gender, with women and men performing distinct job tasks within their occupations. Prior research suggests that non-routine job tasks generally lead to higher wages, especially in digitally advancing contexts. However, these findings are largely based on crosssectional data and neglect gender as a relevant dimension of inequality. We analyze three-wave panel data over nine years from the German National Educational Panel Study to explore the relationship between changes in non-routine job tasks and wages by gender. Given the constrained wage-setting opportunities within German firms, we further examine whether the association between task changes and wages differs for employees with and without job changes, both within and across occupational segments. Our fixed-effect regression analyses reveal gender-specific associations between changes in non-routine job tasks and wage increases. Men benefit from performing more complex and autonomous tasks, with additional gains when an inter-segmental job change accompanies the increase in complex job tasks. Conversely, women do not see wage benefits from enhancements in either complex or autonomous job tasks. These findings underscore the gendered patterns of wage increases associated with advancements in non-routine job tasks, with men profiting intra-individually from shifts towards more non-routine job tasks." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2024 Elsevier) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Gender Wage Gap and Parenthood: Occupational Characteristics Across European Countries (2023)
Zitatform
Adsera, Alícia & Federica Querin (2023): The Gender Wage Gap and Parenthood: Occupational Characteristics Across European Countries. In: European Journal of Population, Jg. 39. DOI:10.1007/s10680-023-09681-4
Abstract
"Different strands of research analyse gender occupational differences and how they relate to differential earnings, especially among parents juggling family demands. We use rich data from PIAAC across a subset of European countries and match occupational characteristics to individuals’ jobs using the O*NET database to analyse, first, whether there are gender differences in the occupational characteristics of jobs, particularly among parents, and second, whether the return to key occupational characteristics varies by gender. Compared to men, women’s jobs generally require more contact with others, less autonomy in decision-making, and less time pressure. In addition, positions held by mothers involve both less leadership expectations and less intensive use of machines than those held by fathers. Further, mothers receive a lower return to both of these occupational characteristics than fathers do. Finally, even though gaps in occupational characteristics such as leadership jointly with the differential sorting of mothers and fathers across sectors explain part of the gender wage gap in Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition models, especially in Continental Europe, a large share remains unexplained particularly in Eastern and Southern European countries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Skills and occupational sex segregation in Europe (2023)
Zitatform
Almstedt Valldor, Amanda & Karin Halldén (2023): Skills and occupational sex segregation in Europe. In: M. Tåhlin (Hrsg.) (2023): A Research Agenda for Skills and Inequality, S. 65-83. DOI:10.4337/9781800378469.00011
Abstract
"This chapter examines levels and trends in the average rate of occupational sex segregation within Europe between 2000 and 2020. The aim is to map out average segregating and integrating forces in total and across nine major occupational groups. We use data from the EU Labour Force Survey and apply the Mutual Information (MI) index to decompose the changes in occupational sex segregation into “pure” (margin free) changes, marginal changes in gender composition of labour supply and occupational composition, as well as emerging and disappearing occupations. Consistent with previous research we find that the average level of occupational sex segregation has decreased in Europe over time. Nevertheless, occupational sex segregation still remains substantive. The average decline seemed mainly to be due a decrease in “pure” (margins-free) segregation, implying that there are fundamental societal forces moving towards a more gender balanced distribution of women and men across European labour markets." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
Aspekt auswählen:
Aspekt zurücksetzen
- Erwerbsbeteiligung von Frauen
- Erwerbsbeteiligung von Männern
- Kinderbetreuung und Pflege
- Berufliche Geschlechtersegregation
- Berufsrückkehr – Wiedereinstieg in den Arbeitsmarkt
- Dual-Career-Couples
- Work-Life
- Geschlechtsspezifische Lohnunterschiede
- Familienpolitische Rahmenbedingungen
- Aktive/aktivierende Arbeitsmarktpolitik
- Arbeitslosigkeit und passive Arbeitsmarktpolitik
- geografischer Bezug